occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,200
- 1,590
Hows this for a sign? Every bit as real as that other one, and a lot more factual.
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg818.imageshack.us%2Fimg818%2F1323%2Fss002h.jpg&hash=95b5c74c27270a519759a4595d62d9ae)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg818.imageshack.us%2Fimg818%2F1323%2Fss002h.jpg&hash=95b5c74c27270a519759a4595d62d9ae)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(I do think it has to be photoshopped. I mean, OWS says some really stupid shit, but even I can't believe that something THIS stupid was on a sign. God, I HOPE not. But, it does sum them up pretty well.)
14 results - TinEye
And, the person who posted that sign - moi - said it was photoshopped.Hows this for a sign? Every bit as real as that other one, and a lot more factual.
Maybe she should have tried studying business management or something in the health care field
DUH!
(I do think it has to be photoshopped. I mean, OWS says some really stupid shit, but even I can't believe that something THIS stupid was on a sign. God, I HOPE not. But, it does sum them up pretty well.)
And, the person who posted that sign - moi - said it was photoshopped.Hows this for a sign? Every bit as real as that other one, and a lot more factual.
Need a tissue?
faked? no shit sherlock.Hows this for a sign? Every bit as real as that other one, and a lot more factual.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Sure it is, it's simply not state approved protesting.Finally.
Squatting is not protesting.
What sign? He's hot!Hows this for a sign? Every bit as real as that other one, and a lot more factual.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
can I squat in your yard? I need to go.Sure it is, it's simply not state approved protesting.Finally.
Squatting is not protesting.
This is actually not that bad, from what I can see it would serve it's purpose.
"The judge wrote in her 25-page decision that protesters had no right to seize Dewey Square, which they have occupied since Sept. 30.
She reasoned that while Occupy Boston protesters may be exercising their expressive rights during their protest, they have no privilege under the First Amendment to seize and hold the land on which they sit.
Drawing a distinction between the occupation of the land and the living activities on the land, McIntyre wrote, The act of occupation, this court has determined as a matter of law, is not speech. Nor is it immune from criminal prosecution for trespass or other crimes.
Judge rules against Occupy Boston protesters, clearing way for eviction; Mayor Menino urges them to leave - Metro Desk - Local news updates from The Boston Globe
about fucking time
"The judge wrote in her 25-page decision that protesters had no right to seize Dewey Square, which they have occupied since Sept. 30.
She reasoned that while Occupy Boston protesters may be exercising their expressive rights during their protest, they have no privilege under the First Amendment to seize and hold the land on which they sit.
Drawing a distinction between the occupation of the land and the living activities on the land, McIntyre wrote, The act of occupation, this court has determined as a matter of law, is not speech. Nor is it immune from criminal prosecution for trespass or other crimes.
Judge rules against Occupy Boston protesters, clearing way for eviction; Mayor Menino urges them to leave - Metro Desk - Local news updates from The Boston Globe
about fucking time
Finally.
Squatting is not protesting.
blah blah blah.Finally.
Squatting is not protesting.
Really?
It seems to me that the method has been used a time or two.
Tomkins square park?
1988 TOMPKINS SQUARE PARK RIOT REVISITED--The SHADOW: Issue #53