Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

[g5000]

Julian Assange is a limp wristed commie. He retooled Wikileaks into a "get Hillary" organization on behalf of his puppeteer Putin.

You wanted Hitlery?

Nope.

You just basically said the ends justify the means.

Fascinating.

 

[g5000]

Julian Assange is a limp wristed commie. He retooled Wikileaks into a "get Hillary" organization on behalf of his puppeteer Putin.

You wanted Hitlery?

Yes he did....

Don't mind Soggy, folks. Lying and parroting lies is his default condition.

 

[g5000]

It is interesting to see just how far the tards have fallen. Just when you think they have hit bottom, they keep digging.

Now they are perfectly okay with a foreign entity interfering in our election process!

You can't help but wonder if they fucking believe in anything at all.

 

[Dot Com]

Someone with a conscience decided that they didn't want someone in the WH who rigged the Primary. Good that the entire DNC isn't rotten YET

Sent from my azpen using Tapatalk

 

[Dot Com]

As the fake news continues to push fiction, it's time to sit back and look at the facts. This latest story is growing legs, much like the "Hands up, don't shoot" lies or the one about how a video caused the Benghazi attacks. The lib media knows that if they repeat something often enough, people will believe it. They are using the same tactic to blame Russia for hurting Hillary during the election. It's meant to undermine Trump and take the blame away from the actions of Hillary and others in the Dem party. From her many scandals to the poor choices made by the DNC and Hillary's campaign, there are a lot of things they want to divert attention away from and this is nothing but a plan to paint Trump as some darling of the Russians.

While lack of security of Hillary's State Dept. emails made it easy for foreign countries to find out what she was up to, in the case of the DNC emails that exposed the plan favoring Hillary over Bernie, it was an inside job. Not Russians. Not other hackers. It was a DNC insider who leaked information regarding the corruption.

And the left continue to claim that Russia was behind this and that they somehow hacked into paper ballots and machines that were not online. Incredible that anyone would buy that, yet there are people willing to believe anything.

"Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

Assange himself vehemently denied Russia had any involvement in the hacks during an interview right before Election Day."

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

Why do you automatically believe the Assange camp on this?

You quoted something that you didn't read? Google- logic

 

[NYcarbineer]

As the fake news continues to push fiction, it's time to sit back and look at the facts. This latest story is growing legs, much like the "Hands up, don't shoot" lies or the one about how a video caused the Benghazi attacks. The lib media knows that if they repeat something often enough, people will believe it. They are using the same tactic to blame Russia for hurting Hillary during the election. It's meant to undermine Trump and take the blame away from the actions of Hillary and others in the Dem party. From her many scandals to the poor choices made by the DNC and Hillary's campaign, there are a lot of things they want to divert attention away from and this is nothing but a plan to paint Trump as some darling of the Russians.

While lack of security of Hillary's State Dept. emails made it easy for foreign countries to find out what she was up to, in the case of the DNC emails that exposed the plan favoring Hillary over Bernie, it was an inside job. Not Russians. Not other hackers. It was a DNC insider who leaked information regarding the corruption.

And the left continue to claim that Russia was behind this and that they somehow hacked into paper ballots and machines that were not online. Incredible that anyone would buy that, yet there are people willing to believe anything.

"Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

Assange himself vehemently denied Russia had any involvement in the hacks during an interview right before Election Day."

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

Why do you automatically believe the Assange camp on this?

You quoted something that you didn't read? Google- logic

The OP states unequivocally that one side of the story is fiction and one is fact.

He chose to call 'fact' the side of the story he likes, and that is his only reason.

 

[tyroneweaver]

JulianAssangeAssociate, Clementine, and Trump are simply not to be trusted.

Your headline should read: "Democrats still unable to cope with loss. Seek solace in conspiracy theories "

You tell em, Jeanne.

Sing it Lester.

 

[tyroneweaver]

As the fake news continues to push fiction, it's time to sit back and look at the facts. This latest story is growing legs, much like the "Hands up, don't shoot" lies or the one about how a video caused the Benghazi attacks. The lib media knows that if they repeat something often enough, people will believe it. They are using the same tactic to blame Russia for hurting Hillary during the election. It's meant to undermine Trump and take the blame away from the actions of Hillary and others in the Dem party. From her many scandals to the poor choices made by the DNC and Hillary's campaign, there are a lot of things they want to divert attention away from and this is nothing but a plan to paint Trump as some darling of the Russians.

While lack of security of Hillary's State Dept. emails made it easy for foreign countries to find out what she was up to, in the case of the DNC emails that exposed the plan favoring Hillary over Bernie, it was an inside job. Not Russians. Not other hackers. It was a DNC insider who leaked information regarding the corruption.

And the left continue to claim that Russia was behind this and that they somehow hacked into paper ballots and machines that were not online. Incredible that anyone would buy that, yet there are people willing to believe anything.

"Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

Assange himself vehemently denied Russia had any involvement in the hacks during an interview right before Election Day."

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

Why do you automatically believe the Assange camp on this?

You quoted something that you didn't read? Google- logic

The OP states unequivocally that one side of the story is fiction and one is fact.

He chose to call 'fact' the side of the story he likes, and that is his only reason.

So once again, you're what you preach against.

3 Times The Democrats Were Fine With Russians Intervening In American Elections

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Julian Assange is a limp wristed commie. He retooled Wikileaks into a "get Hillary" organization on behalf of his puppeteer Putin.

You wanted Hitlery?

Uh, buckeye . . . you dim wit . . . she is gone.

That's good.

Now we work on getting Trump gone.

That's treason, Jake

 

[bendog]

As the fake news continues to push fiction, it's time to sit back and look at the facts. This latest story is growing legs, much like the "Hands up, don't shoot" lies or the one about how a video caused the Benghazi attacks. The lib media knows that if they repeat something often enough, people will believe it. They are using the same tactic to blame Russia for hurting Hillary during the election. It's meant to undermine Trump and take the blame away from the actions of Hillary and others in the Dem party. From her many scandals to the poor choices made by the DNC and Hillary's campaign, there are a lot of things they want to divert attention away from and this is nothing but a plan to paint Trump as some darling of the Russians.

While lack of security of Hillary's State Dept. emails made it easy for foreign countries to find out what she was up to, in the case of the DNC emails that exposed the plan favoring Hillary over Bernie, it was an inside job. Not Russians. Not other hackers. It was a DNC insider who leaked information regarding the corruption.

And the left continue to claim that Russia was behind this and that they somehow hacked into paper ballots and machines that were not online. Incredible that anyone would buy that, yet there are people willing to believe anything.

"Murray, who is a close associate of Wikileaks head Julian Assange, explained it further on his website.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two,” he wrote. “And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.”

It’s the reality that so many in the mainstream media ignore. It wasn’t about who leaked the emails. It was about what they said.

Assange himself vehemently denied Russia had any involvement in the hacks during an interview right before Election Day."

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian

Stop spreading fake news then.

 

[bendog]

Assange is a stooge, played by the Russians. Who know how they feed him the information. Wait, Congress knows much more than we do. Declassify that briefing so all of America will know what they knew in September.

Assange knows exactly what Putin's up to, but Russia's interests coincide with his own: Trump > Hillary. AND anything that hurts the US is good.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's treason, Jake

Not at all. Trump must follow the law. He is not above it. He can be sanctioned and removed by Constitutional procedures. Guess what is going to go on every day of his tenure. He is going to be watched, examined, scrutinized, as are all of his associates and his supporters. It would be treason not to do that.

 

[Preacher]

Facebook now has a way to report fake news. Its fun to report ABC,NBC,CBS etc news LMAO!

 

[BlindBoo]

Assange is a stooge, played by the Russians. Who know how they feed him the information. Wait, Congress knows much more than we do. Declassify that briefing so all of America will know what they knew in September.

Assange knows exactly what Putin's up to, but Russia's interests coincide with his own: Trump > Hillary. AND anything that hurts the US is good.

I don't know. Wikileaks was developed to allow whistle-blowers an anonymous way to to send secrets documents to be published and the former KGB could have impersonated a DNC insider.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Julian Assange is a limp wristed commie. He retooled Wikileaks into a "get Hillary" organization on behalf of his puppeteer Putin.

You wanted Hitlery?

Uh, buckeye . . . you dim wit . . . she is gone.

That's good.

Now we work on getting Trump gone.

Thank you for stating the real reason of all this shit. We knew, but youre confirmed, the recounts, Russia, electoral college temperino is all bullshit and you wont pull it off, but of you do you get

President Mike Pence.....Christians of the world unite!

 

[buckeye45_73]

That's treason, Jake

Not at all. Trump must follow the law. He is not above it. He can be sanctioned and removed by Constitutional procedures. Guess what is going to go on every day of his tenure. He is going to be watched, examined, scrutinized, as are all of his associates and his supporters. It would be treason not to do that.

So you didnt do that for Obama?

 

[Dot Com]

Snowflakes like NYCarabineer & FakeyJakey & Jim52 will never accept the truth

Sent from my azpen using Tapatalk

 

[bendog]

Assange is a stooge, played by the Russians. Who know how they feed him the information. Wait, Congress knows much more than we do. Declassify that briefing so all of America will know what they knew in September.

Assange knows exactly what Putin's up to, but Russia's interests coincide with his own: Trump > Hillary. AND anything that hurts the US is good.

I don't know. Wikileaks was developed to allow whistle-blowers an anonymous way to to send secrets documents to be published and the former KGB could have impersonated a DNC insider.

Assange's hatred of Clinton personally is open, and she would continue to press for his imprisonment. Whether that's good or bad is debatable I assume. I think Snowden should just get clemency, personally. But Assange personally benefits from Russia winning the US election. And they did win. At the least, Russia's aim was to create doubt among Americans that the election was above board. Mission accomplished. Both Putin and Assange benefit from Trump rather than Clinton being potus.

I didn't vote for Hillary or Trump. I find both disgusting.

 

[Nia88]

Yes because Julian Assange is so trustworthy. I had no problem with him leaking info about DNC and Hilary. Public should be informed.

But are you going to tell me there's no corruption in the RNC? That their hands are squeaky clean? Why did Julian only release leaks on the DNC only? It seems like he has some issues with them solely which isn't serving the public's best interest.

It's like Julian was helping Trump to win.

 

[The VOR]

Funny, this poor guy was a Lefty darling during Bush....

And now he is nothing more than a blogger.