JUST IN: US Supreme Court Officially Asked to Overturn Colorado High Court Decision to Bar Trump From Ballot

[BluesLegend]

CO claimed they had iron clad evidence to exclude Trump from the ballot...then ran screaming like girls from the pending SCOTUS beat down.

 

[toobfreak]

It was a no win from the beginning

Can't you just see it?

Right now, millions of lefties and democrats alike are just SEETHING, banging their heads senseless against every wall in the room.

It must look like a Three Stooges convention in DC right now!

 

[WEATHER53]

Trump is back on the ballot...

Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswol announced that Trump will for the time being remain on the ballot, which goes to print on January 5 – unless the Supreme Court affirms the lower court's ruling or otherwise declines to take on the appeal.

Colorado Secretary of State: Trump is BACK on the ballot amid appeal

Donald Trump is back on the presidential ballot in Colorado after an appeal put a stay on the ruling that removed him under an 'insurrection' clause of the U.S. Constitution.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Have they done this because they know they are going to lose if the US Supreme Court hears it?

Griswol is a Dem, of course.

Now they are cowardly scrambling to undo what never should have been done AND at Some point they will Claim They Never Did It To Begin With. We just misunderstood, that’s all.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Can't you just see it?

Right now, millions of lefties and democrats alike are just SEETHING, banging their heads senseless against every wall in the room.

It must look like a Three Stooges convention in DC right now!


View attachment 879931

You'd think they'd tire of it.

 

[toobfreak]

CO claimed they had iron clad evidence to exclude Trump from the ballot...

Must be like that iron clad evidence of Russian collusion Adam Schifty had!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Must be like that iron clad evidence of Russian collusion Adam Schifty had!

Or the infamous pee tape

 

[toobfreak]

You'd think they'd tire of it.

They'll get him next time.

 

[WEATHER53]

No link, and completely unrelated.

Try again, Simp.

It’s called make pretend of fervent feelings and wishes.

 

[Rambunctious]

If democrat appointed judges are going to act like biased political elected dems then they should have to stand for elections just like a politician... all four should lose their appointments for such an un American decision....

 

[toobfreak]

Now they are cowardly scrambling to undo what never should have been done AND at Some point they will Claim They Never Did It To Begin With. We just misunderstood, that’s all.

Meanwhile, Jack Smith's efforts to convict Trump with a hearing disallowing Trump from questioning him or presenting any evidence in his own defense or about J6 are falling apart as well.

 

[Robert W]

When a candidate breaks the rules.

RULES YOU SAY? After you see Biden breaking the rules are you now against Biden?

 

[WEATHER53]

Libs now oozing that when USSC reverses this that a rewriting of the Constitution will have to accompany the ruling

 

[martybegan]

Now they are cowardly scrambling to undo what never should have been done AND at Some point they will Claim They Never Did It To Begin With. We just misunderstood, that’s all.

Either that or someone with the SC got word to Colorado that this is going down in flames, and they better not try the whole "we already printed the ballots" bullshit to get away with it.

 

[toobfreak]

If democrat appointed judges are going to act like biased political elected dems then they should have to stand for elections just like a politician... all four should lose their appointments for such an un American decision....

At the very least, the GOP ought to sue them for attempting to throw another election.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The second point is interesting. The first is utterly imbecilic. How would Congress "enforce" it?
Did they argue that a Federal criminal violation must occur.

A quick read of the argument for question 2 is a good one. I would love to read the response. In essence it says Congress has historically enabled the 14th through legislation and it cites previous cases holding courts have ruled that is required. In essence Congress would have to pass legislation specific to the amendment or adding the penalty to existing criminal laws using the 14th Amendment's authority.

Thats a strong argument.

 

[WEATHER53]

Must be like that iron clad evidence of Russian collusion Adam Schifty had!

The only lib ruse that has worked in last 5 years was Covid
Every other got him now has failed.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Libs now oozing that when USSC reverses this that a rewriting of the Constitution will have to accompany the ruling

Careful, SCOTUS is not required to take this up.

 

[rampart]

Can't you just see it?

Right now, millions of lefties and democrats alike are just SEETHING, banging their heads senseless against every wall in the room.

It must look like a Three Stooges convention in DC right now!


View attachment 879931

excuse me, toob, do you think we never dreamed trump would appeal everything, for as long as it takes for a repub to get pardon power?

no man, trump has been running out the clock for a long time. his attys have delay down to an art. there will never be a trial.

and the poor little girl could take wailing lessons at a trump rally

good day

 

[toobfreak]

Since when does a state civil court judge get the power to disenfranchise millions of voters?

Since the fascists came to power stealing the 2020 election.

 

[Robert W]

Those Confederates actively participated in a years long war trying to break apart the Union. The 14th was passed specifically to address them. They were declared guilty of insurrection by a Congressional act and a Presidential decree.

Apples and oranges to Trump’s case, Simp.

When Abe Lincoln went to war against the South, what could the citizens of VA do but fight back? Confederates voted to leave. They did not simply do so with no consent of their citizens.