Just your average day of "peaceful Islam"...

[Coyote]

Islam apologist / Shariah lover:

Are you familiar with Mosaic law? It's highly detailed, archaic, intolerant and brutal...

Again, more bullshit, ignorance, and false comparisons by the Islam apologist. Mosaic "law" is simply a description of how to practice the religion, thousands of years ago. With zero relevance to Shariah law today.

Mosaic covenant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Mosaic Covenant (named after Moses), also known as the Sinaitic Covenant (named after the biblical Mount Sinai), refers to a biblical covenant between God and the biblical Israelites, including their proselytes.[1][2] The establishment and stipulations of the Mosaic Covenant are recorded in the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, which are traditionally attributed to Mosaic authorship and collectively called the Torah, and this covenant is sometimes also referred to as the Law of Moses or Mosaic Law or the 613 Mitzvot.

In the Hebrew Bible, God established the Mosaic Covenant with the Israelites after he saved them from slavery in Egypt in the events of the Exodus. From it is derived the 613 commandments.
The Mosaic Covenant played a role in defining the Israelite kingdom (c.1220-c.930 BCE), and subsequently the southern Kingdom of Judah (c.930-c.587 BCE) and northern Kingdom of Israel (c.930-c.720 BCE), and Yehud Medinata (c.539-c.333 BCE), and the Hasmonean Kingdom (140-37 BCE), and the Bar Kokhba revolt (132-136 CE)

Main article: Christian views on the Old Covenant


A depiction of the famous Sermon on the Mount of Jesus in which he commented on the Old Covenant. Christians believe that Jesus is the mediator of the New Covenant.[4] Painting by Carl Heinrich Bloch, Danish painter, d. 1890.
The Mosaic Covenant, which Christians generally call the "Old Covenant", in contrast to the New Covenant, has played an important role in the shaping of Christianity and been the source of serious dispute and controversy since its inception, such as Jesus' expounding of the Law during his Sermon on the Mount, the circumcision controversy in Early Christianity, and the Incident at Antioch which has led scholars to dispute the relationship between Paul of Tarsus and Judaism. The Book of Acts recorded that after the ascension of Jesus, that as the first Christian martyr Stephen was killed in a controversy over which he was accused of speaking against the temple and the Mosaic Law, Act 6:8-14. Later, in Acts 15:1-21, the Council of Jerusalem addressed the circumcision controversy in early Christianity.
See also

Check out the actual laws.

 

[YWN666]

All said while totally ignoring the fact that it is because of the intolerance and hatred in shariah law that Muslims go around bombing and murdering infidels in their countries.

They are extremists. There are millions of mainstream muslims in this country and yet you don't hear about them bombing or murdering anyone.

 

[YWN666]

I don't see anyone trying to legislate sharia law in the US, do you? Even if they do try, they won't get very far.

Ohhh, a straw man.

How clever...

That's not a strawman argument at all. I'm pointing out that the fear of sharia law is silly if you base it on the actions of extremists in other countriers. It is not happening here.

 

[YWN666]

I don't see anyone trying to legislate sharia law in the US, do you? Even if they do try, they won't get very far.

Ohhh, a straw man.

How clever...

That's what they do. The jump like butterflies of diversion, comparing Islam to Judaism, then Christianity, then Hinduism, and back and forth.

All the while, making it more that obvious, THERE IS NO COMPARISON.

You're just a rabid anti-Muslim. You're afraid of something that will never happen.

 

[Roudy]

Islam apologist / Shariah lover:

Are you familiar with Mosaic law? It's highly detailed, archaic, intolerant and brutal...

Again, more bullshit, ignorance, and false comparisons by the Islam apologist. Mosaic "law" is simply a description of how to practice the religion, thousands of years ago. With zero relevance to Shariah law today.

Mosaic covenant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Mosaic Covenant (named after Moses), also known as the Sinaitic Covenant (named after the biblical Mount Sinai), refers to a biblical covenant between God and the biblical Israelites, including their proselytes.[1][2] The establishment and stipulations of the Mosaic Covenant are recorded in the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, which are traditionally attributed to Mosaic authorship and collectively called the Torah, and this covenant is sometimes also referred to as the Law of Moses or Mosaic Law or the 613 Mitzvot.

In the Hebrew Bible, God established the Mosaic Covenant with the Israelites after he saved them from slavery in Egypt in the events of the Exodus. From it is derived the 613 commandments.
The Mosaic Covenant played a role in defining the Israelite kingdom (c.1220-c.930 BCE), and subsequently the southern Kingdom of Judah (c.930-c.587 BCE) and northern Kingdom of Israel (c.930-c.720 BCE), and Yehud Medinata (c.539-c.333 BCE), and the Hasmonean Kingdom (140-37 BCE), and the Bar Kokhba revolt (132-136 CE)

Main article: Christian views on the Old Covenant


A depiction of the famous Sermon on the Mount of Jesus in which he commented on the Old Covenant. Christians believe that Jesus is the mediator of the New Covenant.[4] Painting by Carl Heinrich Bloch, Danish painter, d. 1890.
The Mosaic Covenant, which Christians generally call the "Old Covenant", in contrast to the New Covenant, has played an important role in the shaping of Christianity and been the source of serious dispute and controversy since its inception, such as Jesus' expounding of the Law during his Sermon on the Mount, the circumcision controversy in Early Christianity, and the Incident at Antioch which has led scholars to dispute the relationship between Paul of Tarsus and Judaism. The Book of Acts recorded that after the ascension of Jesus, that as the first Christian martyr Stephen was killed in a controversy over which he was accused of speaking against the temple and the Mosaic Law, Act 6:8-14. Later, in Acts 15:1-21, the Council of Jerusalem addressed the circumcision controversy in early Christianity.
See also

Check out the actual laws.

The actual laws are how to practice a religion, from over 3000 years ago and totally irrelevant to this discussion.

 

[Roudy]

Ohhh, a straw man.

How clever...

That's what they do. The jump like butterflies of diversion, comparing Islam to Judaism, then Christianity, then Hinduism, and back and forth.

All the while, making it more that obvious, THERE IS NO COMPARISON.

You're just a rabid anti-Muslim. You're afraid of something that will never happen.

Nah, you're just full of shit ignoramus. The internet is filled with people like you.

 

[YWN666]

That's what they do. The jump like butterflies of diversion, comparing Islam to Judaism, then Christianity, then Hinduism, and back and forth.

All the while, making it more that obvious, THERE IS NO COMPARISON.

You're just a rabid anti-Muslim. You're afraid of something that will never happen.

Nah, you're just full of shit ignoramus. The internet is filled with people like you.

No, you just can't prove your assertion so you blame it on those who appropriately call you a moron.

 

[Roudy]

You're just a rabid anti-Muslim. You're afraid of something that will never happen.

Nah, you're just full of shit ignoramus. The internet is filled with people like you.

No, you just can't prove your assertion so you blame it on those who appropriately call you a moron.

I proved my assertion that Islam is the main cause of child brides, which is prevalent among Muslims. Not once, but many times, and that seems to hurt your feelings.

Fuck your feelings.

 

[Kondor3]

Don't worry were way ahead on the killing of brown people.

So you'd like to see Muslims kill a WHOLE lot more Americans, just to even things out?

How Progressive of you.

Yeah... that's the first impression that I had, in looking at that despicable response, myself.

There are simply some folks walkin' the face of the earth who hold themselves, their kind, and their culture, society and country in such contempt, that they almost-automatically cheer for anyone in the Adversary role...

It's an idiotic and suicidal mindset but the trick is to allow as few of them to attain positions of influence and power as may be practicable, and to weed-out those who slip through the cracks, as they are unmasked...

Self-Haters are the absolute worst...

Unless, of course, we're dealing with an 'alien' presence...

 

[YWN666]

Nah, you're just full of shit ignoramus. The internet is filled with people like you.

No, you just can't prove your assertion so you blame it on those who appropriately call you a moron.

I proved my assertion that Islam is the main cause of child brides, which is prevalent among Muslims. Not once, but many times, and that seems to hurt your feelings.

My feelings don't get hurt by scummy little speedbumps like you. And Matrix, really? Grow the fuck up.

 

[Coyote]

Islam apologist / Shariah lover:



Again, more bullshit, ignorance, and false comparisons by the Islam apologist. Mosaic "law" is simply a description of how to practice the religion, thousands of years ago. With zero relevance to Shariah law today.

Mosaic covenant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Mosaic Covenant (named after Moses), also known as the Sinaitic Covenant (named after the biblical Mount Sinai), refers to a biblical covenant between God and the biblical Israelites, including their proselytes.[1][2] The establishment and stipulations of the Mosaic Covenant are recorded in the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, which are traditionally attributed to Mosaic authorship and collectively called the Torah, and this covenant is sometimes also referred to as the Law of Moses or Mosaic Law or the 613 Mitzvot.

In the Hebrew Bible, God established the Mosaic Covenant with the Israelites after he saved them from slavery in Egypt in the events of the Exodus. From it is derived the 613 commandments.
The Mosaic Covenant played a role in defining the Israelite kingdom (c.1220-c.930 BCE), and subsequently the southern Kingdom of Judah (c.930-c.587 BCE) and northern Kingdom of Israel (c.930-c.720 BCE), and Yehud Medinata (c.539-c.333 BCE), and the Hasmonean Kingdom (140-37 BCE), and the Bar Kokhba revolt (132-136 CE)

Main article: Christian views on the Old Covenant


A depiction of the famous Sermon on the Mount of Jesus in which he commented on the Old Covenant. Christians believe that Jesus is the mediator of the New Covenant.[4] Painting by Carl Heinrich Bloch, Danish painter, d. 1890.
The Mosaic Covenant, which Christians generally call the "Old Covenant", in contrast to the New Covenant, has played an important role in the shaping of Christianity and been the source of serious dispute and controversy since its inception, such as Jesus' expounding of the Law during his Sermon on the Mount, the circumcision controversy in Early Christianity, and the Incident at Antioch which has led scholars to dispute the relationship between Paul of Tarsus and Judaism. The Book of Acts recorded that after the ascension of Jesus, that as the first Christian martyr Stephen was killed in a controversy over which he was accused of speaking against the temple and the Mosaic Law, Act 6:8-14. Later, in Acts 15:1-21, the Council of Jerusalem addressed the circumcision controversy in early Christianity.
See also

Check out the actual laws.

The actual laws are how to practice a religion, from over 3000 years ago and totally irrelevant to this discussion.

Under Mosaic/Old Testament law

There is in the US a group of very conservative Christians known as Christian Reconstructionists/Dominionists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Theology

Dominionists believe that the laws laid down by the Old Testament should be enforced by reforming the U.S. legal system along theocratic lines, including a substantial increase in the use of capital punishment. They also believe that that biblical injunctions regarding slavery should be followed.

"Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, insofar as they believe that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Reconstructionism
...prominent advocates of Christian Reconstructionism have written that according to their understanding, God's law approves of the death penalty not only for murder, but also for propagators of all forms of idolatry,[8][9] active homosexuals,[10] adulterers, practitioners of witchcraft, and blasphemers,[11] and perhaps even recalcitrant youths

For a list of capital crimes: List of capital crimes in the Torah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PublicEye.org - The Website of Political Research Associates

Epitomizing the Reconstructionist idea of Biblical "warfare" is the centrality of capital punishment under Biblical Law. Doctrinal leaders (notably Rushdoony, North, and Bahnsen) call for the death penalty for a wide range of crimes in addition to such contemporary capital crimes as rape, kidnapping, and murder. Death is also the punishment for apostasy (abandonment of the faith), heresy, blasphemy, witchcraft, astrology, adultery, "sodomy or homosexuality," incest, striking a parent, incorrigible juvenile delinquency, and, in the case of women, "unchastity before marriage."

According to Gary North, women who have abortions should be publicly executed, "along with those who advised them to abort their children." Rushdoony concludes: "God's government prevails, and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them." Reconstructionists insist that "the death penalty is the maximum, not necessarily the mandatory penalty." However, such judgments may depend less on Biblical Principles than on which faction gains power in the theocratic republic. The potential for bloodthirsty episodes on the order of the Salem witchcraft trials or the Spanish Inquisition is inadvertently revealed by Reconstructionist theologian Rev. Ray Sutton, who claims that the Reconstructed Biblical theocracies would be "happy" places, to which people would flock because "capital punishment is one of the best evangelistic tools of a society."

The Biblically approved methods of execution include burning (at the stake for example), stoning, hanging, and "the sword." Gary North, the self-described economist of Reconstructionism, prefers stoning because, among other things, stones are cheap, plentiful, and convenient. Punishments for non-capital crimes generally involve whipping, restitution in the form of indentured servitude, or slavery. Prisons would likely be only temporary holding tanks, prior to imposition of the actual sentence.

So...looking at all that I would say it is totally against American principles and rights. Unlike Sharia there are actually factions within the US who support some form of this.

Roudy - why aren't you clamoring for Mosaic/Old Testement law to be banned?

 

[petro]

Get one thing straight. The attack on the mall in Kenya is a tactical change by our enemies, and a clear practice run on a soft target. It is only a matter of time when the attacks come to the homeland...oops, that has happened already. Anyone remember Boston, Fort Hood?
Minnesota has now got a large population of Somali immigrants...estimates being from 35,000 to 100,000 according to local media in Mpls. Hard to pin down as many will not participate in a census. Turns out again there is a Twin Cities connection in this latest attack. Just great that the largest mall and in turn the largest soft target is the Mall of America. Just take the 35,000 figure( the most conservative number), really believe that there isn't a terror cell or two in there? If you believe all 35,000 are peaceful Muslims then you are a fool. If you took that figure as low as 1/2 of 1% that leaves 175 killers waiting to attack.
Our enemies are very capable and swift in changing their tactics, and have the patience to wait as long as necessary to carry out an attack. They will not use airliners crashing into buildings again as that is what we are watching for, but will change to malls, stadiums, movie theaters...etc. There really is no way to protect these kind of sites. About the only way is to better control who enters the country.
The nutjob progressives fail to take this threat seriously. There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, and while some pay lip service and claim how peaceful their religion is, all I hear is crickets when it comes to denouncing those within their own ranks who take the path of violence. Why? Because they really want the infidels to convert or die. Their belief demands it.

 

[Roudy]

Check out the actual laws.

The actual laws are how to practice a religion, from over 3000 years ago and totally irrelevant to this discussion.

Under Mosaic/Old Testament law

There is in the US a group of very conservative Christians known as Christian Reconstructionists/Dominionists: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion_Theology

Dominionists believe that the laws laid down by the Old Testament should be enforced by reforming the U.S. legal system along theocratic lines, including a substantial increase in the use of capital punishment. They also believe that that biblical injunctions regarding slavery should be followed.

"Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, insofar as they believe that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Reconstructionism
...prominent advocates of Christian Reconstructionism have written that according to their understanding, God's law approves of the death penalty not only for murder, but also for propagators of all forms of idolatry,[8][9] active homosexuals,[10] adulterers, practitioners of witchcraft, and blasphemers,[11] and perhaps even recalcitrant youths

For a list of capital crimes: List of capital crimes in the Torah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PublicEye.org - The Website of Political Research Associates

Epitomizing the Reconstructionist idea of Biblical "warfare" is the centrality of capital punishment under Biblical Law. Doctrinal leaders (notably Rushdoony, North, and Bahnsen) call for the death penalty for a wide range of crimes in addition to such contemporary capital crimes as rape, kidnapping, and murder. Death is also the punishment for apostasy (abandonment of the faith), heresy, blasphemy, witchcraft, astrology, adultery, "sodomy or homosexuality," incest, striking a parent, incorrigible juvenile delinquency, and, in the case of women, "unchastity before marriage."

According to Gary North, women who have abortions should be publicly executed, "along with those who advised them to abort their children." Rushdoony concludes: "God's government prevails, and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them." Reconstructionists insist that "the death penalty is the maximum, not necessarily the mandatory penalty." However, such judgments may depend less on Biblical Principles than on which faction gains power in the theocratic republic. The potential for bloodthirsty episodes on the order of the Salem witchcraft trials or the Spanish Inquisition is inadvertently revealed by Reconstructionist theologian Rev. Ray Sutton, who claims that the Reconstructed Biblical theocracies would be "happy" places, to which people would flock because "capital punishment is one of the best evangelistic tools of a society."

The Biblically approved methods of execution include burning (at the stake for example), stoning, hanging, and "the sword." Gary North, the self-described economist of Reconstructionism, prefers stoning because, among other things, stones are cheap, plentiful, and convenient. Punishments for non-capital crimes generally involve whipping, restitution in the form of indentured servitude, or slavery. Prisons would likely be only temporary holding tanks, prior to imposition of the actual sentence.

So...looking at all that I would say it is totally against American principles and rights. Unlike Sharia there are actually factions within the US who support some form of this.

Roudy - why aren't you clamoring for Mosaic/Old Testement law to be banned?

What the fuck are you talking about now? Have you heard anybody complain about Mosaic or Cannon law being practiced in such a way that runs contrary or American values? OMG... The crazy shit you guys keep pulling out of your rear ends to support your idiotic, delusional, ignorant claims.

I give you an A for creativity and fiction. LOL

 

[Coyote]

The actual laws are how to practice a religion, from over 3000 years ago and totally irrelevant to this discussion.

Under Mosaic/Old Testament law

There is in the US a group of very conservative Christians known as Christian Reconstructionists/Dominionists: Dominion Theology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Reconstructionism
...prominent advocates of Christian Reconstructionism have written that according to their understanding, God's law approves of the death penalty not only for murder, but also for propagators of all forms of idolatry,[8][9] active homosexuals,[10] adulterers, practitioners of witchcraft, and blasphemers,[11] and perhaps even recalcitrant youths

For a list of capital crimes: List of capital crimes in the Torah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PublicEye.org - The Website of Political Research Associates

Epitomizing the Reconstructionist idea of Biblical "warfare" is the centrality of capital punishment under Biblical Law. Doctrinal leaders (notably Rushdoony, North, and Bahnsen) call for the death penalty for a wide range of crimes in addition to such contemporary capital crimes as rape, kidnapping, and murder. Death is also the punishment for apostasy (abandonment of the faith), heresy, blasphemy, witchcraft, astrology, adultery, "sodomy or homosexuality," incest, striking a parent, incorrigible juvenile delinquency, and, in the case of women, "unchastity before marriage."

According to Gary North, women who have abortions should be publicly executed, "along with those who advised them to abort their children." Rushdoony concludes: "God's government prevails, and His alternatives are clear-cut: either men and nations obey His laws, or God invokes the death penalty against them." Reconstructionists insist that "the death penalty is the maximum, not necessarily the mandatory penalty." However, such judgments may depend less on Biblical Principles than on which faction gains power in the theocratic republic. The potential for bloodthirsty episodes on the order of the Salem witchcraft trials or the Spanish Inquisition is inadvertently revealed by Reconstructionist theologian Rev. Ray Sutton, who claims that the Reconstructed Biblical theocracies would be "happy" places, to which people would flock because "capital punishment is one of the best evangelistic tools of a society."

The Biblically approved methods of execution include burning (at the stake for example), stoning, hanging, and "the sword." Gary North, the self-described economist of Reconstructionism, prefers stoning because, among other things, stones are cheap, plentiful, and convenient. Punishments for non-capital crimes generally involve whipping, restitution in the form of indentured servitude, or slavery. Prisons would likely be only temporary holding tanks, prior to imposition of the actual sentence.

So...looking at all that I would say it is totally against American principles and rights. Unlike Sharia there are actually factions within the US who support some form of this.

Roudy - why aren't you clamoring for Mosaic/Old Testement law to be banned?

What the fuck are you talking about now? Have you heard anybody complain about Mosaic or Cannon law being practiced in such a way that runs contrary or American values? OMG... The crazy shit you guys keep pulling out of your rear ends to support your idiotic, delusional, ignorant claims.

I give you an A for creativity and fiction. LOL

It's a very simple question Roudy.

We've already established that Sharia is not a threat in the US, and the purpose (according to you) of proposing anti-Sharia law is because Sharia is contrary to American values.

I gave you an example of Mosaic/OT law that is supported by certain religious groups in America. It is clearly contrary to American values and though support for it is small, it is greater than any support for Sharia in this country.

My question is: why aren't you insisting that leglislation be put forth to ban such unAmerican laws?

I give you an "D" for dodging, let's see if we can improve upon that shall we?

 

[Roudy]

Under Mosaic/Old Testament law

There is in the US a group of very conservative Christians known as Christian Reconstructionists/Dominionists: Dominion Theology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Reconstructionism
...prominent advocates of Christian Reconstructionism have written that according to their understanding, God's law approves of the death penalty not only for murder, but also for propagators of all forms of idolatry,[8][9] active homosexuals,[10] adulterers, practitioners of witchcraft, and blasphemers,[11] and perhaps even recalcitrant youths

For a list of capital crimes: List of capital crimes in the Torah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PublicEye.org - The Website of Political Research Associates


So...looking at all that I would say it is totally against American principles and rights. Unlike Sharia there are actually factions within the US who support some form of this.

Roudy - why aren't you clamoring for Mosaic/Old Testement law to be banned?

What the fuck are you talking about now? Have you heard anybody complain about Mosaic or Cannon law being practiced in such a way that runs contrary or American values? OMG... The crazy shit you guys keep pulling out of your rear ends to support your idiotic, delusional, ignorant claims.

I give you an A for creativity and fiction. LOL

It's a very simple question Roudy.

We've already established that Sharia is not a threat in the US, and the purpose (according to you) of proposing anti-Sharia law is because Sharia is contrary to American values.

I gave you an example of Mosaic/OT law that is supported by certain religious groups in America. It is clearly contrary to American values and though support for it is small, it is greater than any support for Sharia in this country.

My question is: why aren't you insisting that leglislation be put forth to ban such unAmerican laws?

I give you an "D" for dodging, let's see if we can improve upon that shall we?

Actually we've established that Shariah is definitely a threat and totally against everything America stands for. It also lays the groundwork for the radicalization of Muslims.

Therefore, it definitely needs to be banned, abolished and outlawed in any civilized, Western nation that desires to remain a free, democratic society with equal rights for all.

If Muslims don't like it, or desire to live in a country ruled by Shariah law, there are plenty of cesspools of hatred, persecution, oppression, and violence under Shariah they can go back to.

The law of the land is the Constitution, not Shariah. That is part of your oath when you become a citizen.

Again, the master-diverter has managed to change the topic this thread to a discussion about "whether Shariah should be banned in the US or not". What was that phrase again? Oh right..."off topic posts have been removed...." Or how about this one "Moved: Should US ban Shariah law?" That'll certainly change the subject from Islamic terrorism and barbarism, no? Wow, I like this new job!

 

[Katzndogz]

The muslims in Kenya did more than kill their victims, they tortured them.

You won't find this in an American newspaper.

Kenya mall attack torture claims emerge from soldiers: 'Eyes gouged out, bodies on hooks, fingers removed' | Mail Online

Soldiers told of the horrific torture meted out by terrorists in the Nairobi mall massacre yesterday with claims hostages were dismembered, had their eyes gouged out and were left hanging from hooks in the ceiling.
Men were said to have been castrated and had fingers removed with pliers before being blinded and hanged.
Children were found dead in the food court fridges with knives still embedded in their bodies,

No doubt a lib will be along to say Christians did worse 1,400 years ago and that justifies what muslims are doing today.

 

[Roudy]

The muslims in Kenya did more than kill their victims, they tortured them.

You won't find this in an American newspaper.

Kenya mall attack torture claims emerge from soldiers: 'Eyes gouged out, bodies on hooks, fingers removed' | Mail Online

Soldiers told of the horrific torture meted out by terrorists in the Nairobi mall massacre yesterday with claims hostages were dismembered, had their eyes gouged out and were left hanging from hooks in the ceiling.
Men were said to have been castrated and had fingers removed with pliers before being blinded and hanged.
Children were found dead in the food court fridges with knives still embedded in their bodies,

No doubt a lib will be along to say Christians did worse 1,400 years ago and that justifies what muslims are doing today.

And all because they weren't Muslim, and happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Looking at the pictures again, it appears these animals wanted to bring down the whole structure using explosives, (9-11 style), and managed to partially achieve that. However the press makes it look like it was a shooting rampage.

Crazy Coyote: "this has nothing to do with Islam or Shariah law, there are extremists in every religion" <snicker>

 

[YWN666]

The muslims in Kenya did more than kill their victims, they tortured them.

You won't find this in an American newspaper.

Kenya mall attack torture claims emerge from soldiers: 'Eyes gouged out, bodies on hooks, fingers removed' | Mail Online

Soldiers told of the horrific torture meted out by terrorists in the Nairobi mall massacre yesterday with claims hostages were dismembered, had their eyes gouged out and were left hanging from hooks in the ceiling.
Men were said to have been castrated and had fingers removed with pliers before being blinded and hanged.
Children were found dead in the food court fridges with knives still embedded in their bodies,

No doubt a lib will be along to say Christians did worse 1,400 years ago and that justifies what muslims are doing today.

And all because they weren't Muslim, and happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Looking at the pictures again, it appears these animals wanted to bring down the whole structure using explosives, (9-11 style), and managed to partially achieve that. However the press makes it look like it was a shooting rampage.

Crazy Coyote: "this has nothing to do with Islam or Shariah law, there are extremists in every religion" <snicker>

So why aren't we seeing this kind of violence in Muslims communities across America? Are you getting the point yet?
I'll have another dumbed down explanation standing by in case you don't.

 

[Katzndogz]

After the success at the Kenyan mall, muslims intend to do the same at the Miss World pageant.

News from The Associated Press

And the libs will be along to say Christians did the same thing 1,400 years ago.

 

[Katzndogz]

The muslims in Kenya did more than kill their victims, they tortured them.

You won't find this in an American newspaper.

Kenya mall attack torture claims emerge from soldiers: 'Eyes gouged out, bodies on hooks, fingers removed' | Mail Online

Soldiers told of the horrific torture meted out by terrorists in the Nairobi mall massacre yesterday with claims hostages were dismembered, had their eyes gouged out and were left hanging from hooks in the ceiling.
Men were said to have been castrated and had fingers removed with pliers before being blinded and hanged.
Children were found dead in the food court fridges with knives still embedded in their bodies,

No doubt a lib will be along to say Christians did worse 1,400 years ago and that justifies what muslims are doing today.

And all because they weren't Muslim, and happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Looking at the pictures again, it appears these animals wanted to bring down the whole structure using explosives, (9-11 style), and managed to partially achieve that. However the press makes it look like it was a shooting rampage.

Crazy Coyote: "this has nothing to do with Islam or Shariah law, there are extremists in every religion" <snicker>

So why aren't we seeing this kind of violence in Muslims communities across America? Are you getting the point yet?
I'll have another dumbed down explanation standing by in case you don't.

Unless your explanation includes that no one knows who has a CW and is armed the best you could say is we haven't seen it yet. Some of the Mall terrorists came from America so it's not out of the realm that it would happen here. Mall of America has already increased its security.

If you think that muslims in the US are just too peaceful to commit that kind of violence, we have already been schooled that they are not.