Gunny
Gold Member
I'm being dishonest?
You want to have a different standard for this and "general" cases. As if you can just make up rules that only apply to this case and not explain them. Sorry, but if you want to create standards out of your ass, you need to justify those standards.
You are incredibly simple minded. You don't realize that although I don't know HOW its biased, I can demonstrate evidence that it IS biased. Just as I don't know HOW a car works, I can demonstrate that it DOES work. Simple concept, really, what is the reason for your cognitive failure?
There's where you are being dishonest, I never said there were "general cases" ... each case is unique ... as I have always said and will always say, it depends on what you are talking about. You have not demonstrated bias from tests, and you cannot, all you can offer is some circumstantial evidence, and that is not evidence, it is actually worthless. Show proof or admit you are being dishonest in an attempt to paint the "white man" as evil.
Actually you used general terms here.
if something exists it has to have an explanation, otherwise it is nothing but a dream. If it did exist you would be able to prove it. You are being dishonest and changing the topic as well as goal posts
Again. Tell me why if it existed here I would be able to prove it. And explain why this case is different from, say, the car example I gave. Explain it or admit that you are racist and want to justify acts of racism.
How about you just admit you are brainwashed, numbnuts? There is no racism involved. You qualify or you don't by passing the test. Simple as THAT. Anything else, to include your red herring rabbit chasing car story is just blowing smoke.