Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
well now we know how he votes on Trump related court cases ahead of time.There would be no courts presided by judges if they could not rule on issues on which they held personal opinions. Certainly not the show trial in NY.
We are living through, perhaps the most corrupt, version of the SCOTUS.
They are highly partisan, highly radical, and highly activist.
And they DGAF about it.
The far rightwing organization The Heritage Foundation really got their money's worth.
They need to be brought to heel!
Voting along ideological lines is not corruption.We are living through, perhaps the most corrupt, version of the SCOTUS.
The cases they deny cert to say otherwise.They are highly partisan, highly radical, and highly activist.
You only care because you don't like the rulings.And they DGAF about it.
His wife is entitled to free speech.
So, as to this “news,” the appropriate reply is, “zzz.”
ZzzHas he disavowed the message his wife was sending?
In that case…..The Judge needs to be clear that his wife’s views are not his ownAnd the first time a Republican appointed judge's wife states that her husband forbids her to express political opinions publicly that are contrary to his, you will be first in line with the stone in your hand.
He doesn't have to do a damn thing... who are you?...In that case…..The Judge needs to be clear that his wife’s views are not his own
He didnt do that
Irrelevant, he's not going to state his political views. Republican appointed Justices don't do that, because they are independent jurists, unlike democrat appointed partisans. No, you first insist Republican appointed Justices are supposed to squash their wives' political expression, then claim he's supposed to state his own opinions when she contradicts his. You really don't have a leg to stand on in this one.In that case…..The Judge needs to be clear that his wife’s views are not his own
He didnt do that
We are living through, perhaps the most corrupt, version of the SCOTUS.
They are highly partisan, highly radical, and highly activist.
And they DGAF about it.
The far rightwing organization The Heritage Foundation really got their money's worth.
They need to be brought to heel!
They like to think they can dictate what public officials owe them.He doesn't have to do a damn thing... who are you?...
Based on Alitos flag, it is clear he displays his political partisanshipIrrelevant, he's not going to state his political views. Republican appointed Justices don't do that, because they are independent jurists, unlike democrat appointed partisans. No, you first insist Republican appointed Justices are supposed to squash their wives' political expression, then claim he's supposed to state his own opinions when she contradicts his. You really don't have a leg to stand on in this one.
He is appointed therefore he is partisan by the nature of that... just like the liberal justices...Based on Alitos flag, it is clear he displays his political partisanship
Did Ginsburg ever recuse herself from an abortion case after making her views on the subject well known? I think we agree she did not, yet here the usual suspects are waxing indignant that the spouse of a Justice expressed a political opinion.My husband is not a supreme court justice.
All the recusal reasons include the judge's wife/ husband and children who may live with them....?
the purpose... is for the judge's appearance of neutrality.
Besides Alito and Thomas, has there ever been a judge's wife that has shown their involvement in political discourse on issues that their husbands were likely to have brought before them while sitting on the court?
I did a quick research on it and found none, in our history....
Ginsburg openly displayed her political partisanship on abortion, yet I don't recall you ever slamming her for doing that.Based on Alitos flag, it is clear he displays his political partisanship
He is appointed therefore he is partisan by the nature of that... just like the liberal justices...
Going by the plain wording of the Constitution instead of making up penumbras and emanations to get the desired result is partisan? Who woulda ever thought that?Good to see Conservatives finally admitting that the judges they appoint are partisan