Likkmee
Gold Member
Somebody ought to ask Snoop if that pussy were any decent !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You have the 14th Amendment. Try that stupid shit in Iran or North Korea.cognitive dissonance is all the right wing has.See a shrink. Nobody’s saying that nut job. You live in a nation that gives you the greatest measure of freedom and freedom from discrimination on earth. But you bitch about it. Typical extremists leftist....thank Goodness women don't really believe in equality and equal rights, and insist, it is for our own Good.
how about some equality and equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed!
BTW don’t talk labor to me. Unions are shit. They voted for Billary NAFTA Clinton. I was a union officer at the time. Bill Clinton was a traitor and a lazy Democrat asshole.cognitive dissonance is all the right wing has.See a shrink. Nobody’s saying that nut job. You live in a nation that gives you the greatest measure of freedom and freedom from discrimination on earth. But you bitch about it. Typical extremists leftist....thank Goodness women don't really believe in equality and equal rights, and insist, it is for our own Good.
how about some equality and equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed!
you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.dude, you are nothing but a judgement guy. Every thread. How you have more class than the biased thinking left, right, whatever. dude. you are a self righteous SOB to the max. you are afraid of commitment.
BTW, the fact is she slept with a married man in return for opportunities. that makes her a whore. No judgement, just fact.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
She’s a ho.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
Name one. They’re all consensual and he gained nothing but a good time.With all the women he’s attacked, you could almost say the same thing about Donald Trump.
nawWith all the women he’s attacked, you could almost say the same thing about Donald Trump.
At least that's what the media has fed you.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
What white Republicans call a respected and married black woman. Typical. And expected.She’s a ho.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
you do? you racist fk.What white Republicans call a respected and married black woman. Typical. And expected.She’s a ho.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
She’s a ho. Bigots like you need to qualify it by skin color.What white Republicans call a respected and married black woman. Typical. And expected.She’s a ho.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
naw, you can'tI said almost. With Trump you could say all the women he’s attacked along his trip to the top. That sounds more like it.nawWith all the women he’s attacked, you could almost say the same thing about Donald Trump.
Trumpbots are appalled at her immorality in having a ten year relationship with a man separated from his wife, and the man was older than she.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
not at all, she can fk whoever she likes, it's taking a position over others that's offensive and is trading sex for work. that's a ho.Trumpbots are appalled at her immorality in having a ten year relationship with a man separated from his wife, and the man was older than she.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.