Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure doesPeople choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
What makes you think I am not authorized to speak for god?Sure doesPeople choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
As near as I can tell...neither of you is authorized to speak for God.
In your case, you are full of shit all the time anyway....you'd be doing diety a favor by not standing up for them. It really kills their credibility.
Cons are:That's because Republicans hate gay people. In fact, it's well known gays are at the top the GOP hate list.
This is the list:
1. Gays
2. Muslims
3. Blacks
4. Hispanics
5. Liberals
6. Jews
7. Women's rights
8. Sick and disabled
9. College professors
10. Scientists
Is does occasionally change a little. Where Jews are used to be the poor. But I think the poor has fallen out of the top 10. But when October comes and those healthcare subsidies end, they will come roaring back into the top ten.
Liberals hate:
1. Republicans
2. Christians
3, Jews
4. Hard workers
5. White people
6. Gun owners
7. Guns and bullets
8. The constitution
9. The bill of rights
10. America
And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Why would that be a joke?It's not our fault we're better than you. Nor to our credit. We're still sinners, we're just saved from our sins, that's all.I thank the Lord that I was created with the hetero gene.You don't even believe in the Lord, so STFU.
And he didn't "create" gays. Just like he didn't create sinners. People choose to sin, people choose to be gay. The Lord creates life, what that life does is up to them.
But homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord. However, it's not my place to judge. That's up to God himself.
Dumbshit comment. People are created as created. You sound like you are parroting some ignorant southern baptist boob or some other pathetic fundie.
#HeteroPride.
What "lord"? Yeah, I got the "hetero gene," too. But I don't go around insulting people who got the "other" genes. What's that about? "Hetero pride," my ass. I happen to be female and the only people I've ever been attracted to were male. I never had to "come out of the closet" and stop hiding the fact that I am heterosexual like the LGBTs had to do. If you had any "pride," it would be as a heterosexual WOMAN, who decides which man she will welcome in her bed and which she will not, and stop kowtowing to heterosexual men who want to program us to have sex on their command. Being a "proud" straight woman means that we make our own choices, Sometimes it's "yes;" and sometimes it's "no." If you're so proud, you would understand this fundamental concept. Stand up for heterosexual women for a change.
And I do stand up for heteros of all genders, which is why I'm better than you.
#ThinkForYourself.
#HeteroPride.
You are serious ? Really ?
Holy shit! That is one hell of a rachis rant! Again, I recommend anger management. I think that you are full of shit about having gay friends and, if you do, I'm willing to bet that you would not lay this bigoted bullshit on them, or they would no longer be your friends.Geezzzzz dude. It sounds like you're another one here who needs some anger management help. Your the one going all militant now and I seriously doubt if you really have anything to gripe about.Why are conservatives always such assholes when it comes to homosexuals?
It's really the government they tend to hate. You, of course, love it since it keeps you in clothing.
My guess is that homosexuals would assimilate quite well if they were not so fucking militant about it.
But, nooooooooooo, they just have to have it their way and in the course of things screw up institutions that have been around longer than the gay rights movement.
Most gays I know think all this is bullshit and wish the headline grabbers would move out of the country.
An oppressed minority becomes militant out of necessity . They have that right and a obligation to them selves to fight back against discrimination and marginalization. Bitching about their militancy makes you sound exactly like the racial bigots who complain about uppity blacks who don't know their place.
LGBT people have come a long way but in some ways still have much to overcome. They are still subject to discrimination in housing, employment and, as we see here adoption. The fact is, that in progressive states like New Jersey where I am, they have assimilated quite well. It is not an issue and no one notices or cares that they live among us as productive and responsible citizens and family people . There is no militancy here because there is no need for it, unlike in Kansas and other places. . Ask your self how passive you would be if you were denied the right of full participation in society, and equal protection under the law based on some arbitrary characteristic or membership in a certain group.
Out of necessity ?
What necessity ?
Many groups have assimilated with no militancy.
Now, thanks for the lecture.
Only I lived in California for six years...where things are so progressive. And cities like Concord and Walnut Creek were forced to allow Gay Pride parandes where gay men would wear leather outfits that were simply gross. And women would wear outfits that challenged people to tell them they were sick. So, they didn't assimilate naturally...but they pushed themselves on people in a way that nobody else has.
And somehow you think you can tell others that it's O.K. for them to be militant...but you (being the tolerant motherfucker that you are) can call others bigotted for being militant back.
Kiss my ass.
You ask what the necessity for being militant is?? That alone tells me a lot about you. You think that gays folks should just shut up an be thankful for what they achieved, and shut up about the small stuff like employment discrimination, public accomodations and adoption, don't you?
Why don't you settle down and explain what's really troubling you. I doubt that its just about parades. California has not always been so gay friendly. When were you there to witness these horrific spectacles? In any case, I doubt if that is what this is really all about. I stand by my assessment of your attitude. I want to silence gays for speaking out and demanding their rights, and when they do you bleat about militancy ..JUST LIKE others did - and still do , when complaining about "uppity Negroes "
Why don't you twist things a little harder and maybe they'll just snap.
Yes, I asked what the necessity of being militant was about. Why ? That question comes more from my gay friends than anything else. Know why ? For the most part they have not experienced what you call out. They live the complex lives they have dealing with difficult issues (especially the ones who were married before deciding they were gay) such as loving a woman who has been a great partner while being attracted to men. Oh....and let's not forget that same militancy in the gay community is what has some in the community openly critisizing and condemning gays who WON'tT leave their wives or families to be "really gay". Or freezing out those who don't agree with them in their approach to being confrontational. And we are not talking gays in the closet. These are people who are openly gay and who do their best to simply be part of what's around them without making a big deal about it. Who are openly accepted and contribute as if they were not any different (because they really are not any different).
Actually, it is what it is all about. I could care less about gay marriage (my thinking is that if heteros wouldn't get divorced at 50%, gay marriage really would not be an issue).
California is not gay friendly...so you take to the streets in a parade in a city that does not want you there to start and you rub it in people's faces by wearking things like black leather chaps with no underwear or nun's outfits spattered in red paint.....or...as one guy did....putting a 4 ft paper miche dick in a wheelbarrow and parading down mainstreet.
But you don't see the disconnect.
I could really give a flying fuck about "your assessment". You won't (because you can't) answer why it's so great for gays to shove the worst of their culture on everyone, but it is bigoted to push back. That makes no fucking sense whatsoever.
The upitty comment is just making shit up. Fuck you.
And I'll go the same with those assholes who are so openly hostile towards gun owners. You wanna push...fine. But shut the fuck up whem people push back.
Actually, it is what it is all about. I could care less about gay marriage (my thinking is that if heteros wouldn't get divorced at 50%, gay marriage really would not be an issue).
Don't feed the zombie troll bots, The are dead but don't know it. Given the chance they will eat your brains.So they aren't chicks?They're fam, Bart.Why else would you have two young chicks as an avi?I thank the Lord that I was created with the hetero gene.You don't even believe in the Lord, so STFU.
And he didn't "create" gays. Just like he didn't create sinners. People choose to sin, people choose to be gay. The Lord creates life, what that life does is up to them.
But homosexuality is an abomination to the Lord. However, it's not my place to judge. That's up to God himself.
Dumbshit comment. People are created as created. You sound like you are parroting some ignorant southern baptist boob or some other pathetic fundie.
#HeteroPride.
All machismo, all the time.....
Geezzzzz dude. It sounds like you're another one here who needs some anger management help. Your the one going all militant now and I seriously doubt if you really have anything to gripe about.Why are conservatives always such assholes when it comes to homosexuals?
It's really the government they tend to hate. You, of course, love it since it keeps you in clothing.
My guess is that homosexuals would assimilate quite well if they were not so fucking militant about it.
But, nooooooooooo, they just have to have it their way and in the course of things screw up institutions that have been around longer than the gay rights movement.
Most gays I know think all this is bullshit and wish the headline grabbers would move out of the country.
An oppressed minority becomes militant out of necessity . They have that right and a obligation to them selves to fight back against discrimination and marginalization. Bitching about their militancy makes you sound exactly like the racial bigots who complain about uppity blacks who don't know their place.
LGBT people have come a long way but in some ways still have much to overcome. They are still subject to discrimination in housing, employment and, as we see here adoption. The fact is, that in progressive states like New Jersey where I am, they have assimilated quite well. It is not an issue and no one notices or cares that they live among us as productive and responsible citizens and family people . There is no militancy here because there is no need for it, unlike in Kansas and other places. . Ask your self how passive you would be if you were denied the right of full participation in society, and equal protection under the law based on some arbitrary characteristic or membership in a certain group.
Out of necessity ?
What necessity ?
Many groups have assimilated with no militancy.
Now, thanks for the lecture.
Only I lived in California for six years...where things are so progressive. And cities like Concord and Walnut Creek were forced to allow Gay Pride parandes where gay men would wear leather outfits that were simply gross. And women would wear outfits that challenged people to tell them they were sick. So, they didn't assimilate naturally...but they pushed themselves on people in a way that nobody else has.
And somehow you think you can tell others that it's O.K. for them to be militant...but you (being the tolerant motherfucker that you are) can call others bigotted for being militant back.
Kiss my ass.
You ask what the necessity for being militant is?? That alone tells me a lot about you. You think that gays folks should just shut up an be thankful for what they achieved, and shut up about the small stuff like employment discrimination, public accomodations and adoption, don't you?
Why don't you settle down and explain what's really troubling you. I doubt that its just about parades. California has not always been so gay friendly. When were you there to witness these horrific spectacles? In any case, I doubt if that is what this is really all about. I stand by my assessment of your attitude. I want to silence gays for speaking out and demanding their rights, and when they do you bleat about militancy ..JUST LIKE others did - and still do , when complaining about "uppity Negroes "
Why don't you twist things a little harder and maybe they'll just snap.
Yes, I asked what the necessity of being militant was about. Why ? That question comes more from my gay friends than anything else. Know why ? For the most part they have not experienced what you call out. They live the complex lives they have dealing with difficult issues (especially the ones who were married before deciding they were gay) such as loving a woman who has been a great partner while being attracted to men. Oh....and let's not forget that same militancy in the gay community is what has some in the community openly critisizing and condemning gays who WON'tT leave their wives or families to be "really gay". Or freezing out those who don't agree with them in their approach to being confrontational. And we are not talking gays in the closet. These are people who are openly gay and who do their best to simply be part of what's around them without making a big deal about it. Who are openly accepted and contribute as if they were not any different (because they really are not any different).
Actually, it is what it is all about. I could care less about gay marriage (my thinking is that if heteros wouldn't get divorced at 50%, gay marriage really would not be an issue).
California is not gay friendly...so you take to the streets in a parade in a city that does not want you there to start and you rub it in people's faces by wearking things like black leather chaps with no underwear or nun's outfits spattered in red paint.....or...as one guy did....putting a 4 ft paper miche dick in a wheelbarrow and parading down mainstreet.
But you don't see the disconnect.
I could really give a flying fuck about "your assessment". You won't (because you can't) answer why it's so great for gays to shove the worst of their culture on everyone, but it is bigoted to push back. That makes no fucking sense whatsoever.
The upitty comment is just making shit up. Fuck you.
And I'll go the same with those assholes who are so openly hostile towards gun owners. You wanna push...fine. But shut the fuck up whem people push back.
How many Jewish politicians are RepublicanSaying republicans hate Jews when its republicans who go out of their way to defend Israel and the liberal left goes out of its way to say Israel is evil....I'm not quite sure how THAT got on the republican "hate" list.
Can’t love them that much
And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Please show me the word "homosexual" in the constitution.
Thanks.
You can find it here in the Constitution:And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Please show me the word "homosexual" in the constitution.
Thanks.
And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Please show me the word "homosexual" in the constitution.
Thanks.
And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Please show me the word "homosexual" in the constitution.
Thanks.
Show me the word heterosexual
Show me the word Christian
Show me the word bigoted dumb fuck
They’re not there either but you have the right to be those things too
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They can marry, but until Two biological men or two women can create babies thru sex with each other they are not meant to be parents. And they cannot be fit parents to raise a child normally. Don't give me any bullshit about normal couples who are barren are allowed to adopt. The difference is the child will have a father and a mother. The basic unit of a family.Since the law says gay can legally marry, they should be treated like all married couples. Even single people can adopt.
My home state of Kansas is showing the way. And now, just this weekend, our governor of Iowa put the cabash on late term abortions. After six weeks the heart starts beating. Since when a heart stops beating determines when you're dead, a beating heart determines when you're alive and viable.Kansas is a great example to the nation of successful conservatism.
They can marry, but until Two biological men or two women can create babies thru sex with each other they are not meant to be parents. And they cannot be fit parents to raise a child normally. Don't give me any bullshit about normal couples who are barren are allowed to adopt. The difference is the child will have a father and a mother. The basic unit of a family.Since the law says gay can legally marry, they should be treated like all married couples. Even single people can adopt.
What makes you think I am not authorized to speak for god?Sure doesPeople choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
As near as I can tell...neither of you is authorized to speak for God.
In your case, you are full of shit all the time anyway....you'd be doing diety a favor by not standing up for them. It really kills their credibility.
You have any proof of that?
And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Please show me the word "homosexual" in the constitution.
Thanks.You can find it here in the Constitution:And the Constitution protects their right to make that choice.People choose to be fags.
The Lord does NOT create them as such.
Please show me the word "homosexual" in the constitution.
Thanks.
“When sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice.”
LAWRENCE V. TEXAS
You’re welcome.
