Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

...It's like saying my house was robbed, so I want the FBI to investigate. Such a setup...
No, it's not "like that", and you know it.

...Her lawyer knows quite well the FBI won't investigate, so she'll use that as a copout for her client not appearing before the Senate for questioning...
Optics in a mod-term election year:

1. if lawmakers postpone long enough (a week? two weeks? more?) for the FBI to take a second look... Dems win.

2. if lawmakers are seen ignoring an (reportedly) abused woman in an election year and refuse to investigate... Dems win.

...Boy libs are stupid...
Indeed... they oftentimes are... as dumb-as-a-box-o-rox... truly on a par with the worst of the Right.

...They fell for this hook, line and sinker.
Somebody fell for it hook, line and sinker... but you may have it wrong with respect to who, in this narrow context.

( see "Optics in a mid-term election year:", above )

Yes, it is exactly like that. The first word in FBI is Federal. You can’t call out the feds for a local crime, especially when there is nothing more than an accusation.

Even if a full blown investigation was launched, it would take much longer than two weeks. As always, the Dems are trying to put Republicans in a damn if you do—damn if you don’t situation. The only smart thing to do is to go forward with the confirmation process if she doesn’t show up Monday.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
they seem to willfully ignore this little fact and keep demanding something they know they won't get. *all of this* is a stall tactic. trying to destroy a mans life for a stall tactic.

When it comes to power, the Democrats could care less who they destroy. Even if the FBI investigated this, they would find nothing and then the left would complain that it was Trump’s FBI who ushered Kavanaugh in the Supreme Court.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
the dems have put up a scenario that *can't* be investigated so they demand it should be and by people they know are not the right ones.

why?

because it gives their sheep something to scream about and trying to stall til midterms.

Why can't it be investigated?
 
No, it's not "like that", and you know it.

Optics in a mod-term election year:

1. if lawmakers postpone long enough (a week? two weeks? more?) for the FBI to take a second look... Dems win.

2. if lawmakers are seen ignoring an (reportedly) abused woman in an election year and refuse to investigate... Dems win.

Indeed... they oftentimes are... as dumb-as-a-box-o-rox... truly on a par with the worst of the Right.


Somebody fell for it hook, line and sinker... but you may have it wrong with respect to who, in this narrow context.

( see "Optics in a mid-term election year:", above )

Yes, it is exactly like that. The first word in FBI is Federal. You can’t call out the feds for a local crime, especially when there is nothing more than an accusation.

Even if a full blown investigation was launched, it would take much longer than two weeks. As always, the Dems are trying to put Republicans in a damn if you do—damn if you don’t situation. The only smart thing to do is to go forward with the confirmation process if she doesn’t show up Monday.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
they seem to willfully ignore this little fact and keep demanding something they know they won't get. *all of this* is a stall tactic. trying to destroy a mans life for a stall tactic.

When it comes to power, the Democrats could care less who they destroy. Even if the FBI investigated this, they would find nothing and then the left would complain that it was Trump’s FBI who ushered Kavanaugh in the Supreme Court.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
the dems have put up a scenario that *can't* be investigated so they demand it should be and by people they know are not the right ones.

why?

because it gives their sheep something to scream about and trying to stall til midterms.

Why can't it be investigated?
what year was it again?
who's house was it?
how did she get to the party? who drove?

she has given zero specifics other than 2 names, both of which have said it never happened.

it's also a local matter, not FBI. asking for FBI means you're stalling, not wanting justice. if you wanted justice, follow proper channels.
 
Of course. Anything to delay a confirmation vote. Outcome is irrelevant as long as this spurious demand delays the vote a little longer. Go ahead with this bs investigation but let's get on with the confirmation vote, as well.

What's the rush?

No rush. Let's go ahead and seat him on the SC, then they can investigate as long as they want to. What could be wrong with that?
 
Kreepy Kavanaugh is in a no-win situation - unless his name is completely cleared of sexual assault.

It's already cleared of sexual assault. He never did anything to this liberal POS.

So, women who dare to accuse a man of sexual assault are attacked as "pieces of shit"?

Gee,I woner why they don't alaways come foreward.
name any other woman who had less details on a sexual assault than her.
 
Kreepy Kavanaugh is in a no-win situation - unless his name is completely cleared of sexual assault.

It's already cleared of sexual assault. He never did anything to this liberal POS.

So, women who dare to accuse a man of sexual assault are attacked as "pieces of shit"?

Gee,I woner why they don't alaways come foreward.

According to Hillary, they're bimbos. Anyway, she needs to prove her case. Put up or shut up.
 
Kreepy Kavanaugh is in a no-win situation - unless his name is completely cleared of sexual assault.

It's already cleared of sexual assault. He never did anything to this liberal POS.

So, women who dare to accuse a man of sexual assault are attacked as "pieces of shit"?

Gee,I woner why they don't alaways come foreward.

According to Hillary, they're bimbos. Anyway, she needs to prove her case. Put up or shut up.
yea, if they accused bill i'm sure hillary would not be talking about giving her the benefit of the doubt...
 
Why can't it be investigated?

There is no problem at all with an investigation.

In fact a thorough investigation is certainly called for, and should be continued regardless of the results of the vote.

I don't see any senator's vote turning on the results of the investigation, so might as well have it right now. There is a fall docket that needs to be adjudicated.
 
Kreepy Kavanaugh is in a no-win situation - unless his name is completely cleared of sexual assault.

Actually, he is in a great position. His only accuser refuses to testify. He is going to sit on the Supreme Court at the start of next session. He doesn't lose at all here

No, she has NOT refused to testify. She just wants a thorough nonpartisan investigation before testifying. If she is lying about the Kavanaugh sexual assault allegation - why would she want a thorough nonpartisan investigation?

As of yet there was no response by her whether she will appear or not.

she has stated that She won't appear until the FBI investigates. They already said they wont.

so she says she won't come monday
So we’re suposed to just destroy this guy and his family because the rule of law no longer applies. This broad should be grilled hard and if she slips up one time she goes to prison for false accusations.

The "guy's " own actions will have destroyed him. Why are you afraid of an investigation?
 
Ford’s lawyers released a letter to committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), CNN reported, calling for an investigation to “ensure the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decision.”

Speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday, attorney Lisa Banks reiterated that her client was “prepared to cooperate with the committee and with any law enforcement investigation.”

Christine Blasey Ford Calls On FBI To Investigate Kavanaugh Accusation Before Hearing

Good for her! Even Kavanaugh should want a thorough investigation - otherwise this cloud of doubt and suspicion will hang over him.
Washington redskin,
The loopy kunt is lying
 
Ford’s lawyers released a letter to committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), CNN reported, calling for an investigation to “ensure the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decision.”

Speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday, attorney Lisa Banks reiterated that her client was “prepared to cooperate with the committee and with any law enforcement investigation.”

Christine Blasey Ford Calls On FBI To Investigate Kavanaugh Accusation Before Hearing

Good for her! Even Kavanaugh should want a thorough investigation - otherwise this cloud of doubt and suspicion will hang over him.

The FBI does not investigate allegations that are 40 years old that are not federal crimes nor should they

The statute of limitations on this alleged crime expired long ago hence it is no longer a matter for any branch of law enforcement
 
Not with all that has come to light and Ford playing the Democrat Game

What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.


Where does she think they will find these "facts"? We're talking about what is essentially a thirty year or so old case of "she-said-he-said". Unless she has the proverbial blue dress hanging in her closet, photos, a corroborating witness, or a Disneyland ride line of women all making the same accusation, it's her word against his.

Now, don't misinterpret me, I'm not saying she's lying, and I'm not say he did or didn't do it. The fact is, none of us know, nor should we be drawing any conclusions based on unproven allegations. The fact that she apparently passed a lie detector test (inadmissible in a court of law) tells us one of three things, either she knows how to beat the test (given her education, entirely possible), or she believes what she is saying but is wrong and Kavanaugh wasn't involved (not beyond the realm of possibilities, people often remember events incorrectly), or it all happened the way she describes.

I'm curious as to why Professor Ford waited until now to speak out, why not torpedo his initial appointment to the bench?

At this point, I'm not caring one way or the other about his appointment.


I have a question for you, Lakhota: Are you even a little bit bothered by Diane Feinstein's withholding the letter, which all reports say she's had since July, until the 11th hour?
We do know. She's lying. That's as obvious as the sun rising in the East. You only help the barbarians by saying you don't know if she's lying.

So let the FBI investigate. Lying to the FBI is a felony.
 
I still can't believe that the Senate NaziCons want Dr. Ford to sit at the same table with Kavanaugh. Unbelievable.

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.
it also puts burden of proof on the accuser, fool.
 
I still can't believe that the Senate NaziCons want Dr. Ford to sit at the same table with Kavanaugh. Unbelievable.

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

Due process for what?

No charges can be brought since the statute of limitations has expired.

The FBI dies not investigate allegations of sexual assault nor should they

This should be up to local PD if anyone and local PD won't want to waste time and resources when no charges can be brought
 
Not with all that has come to light and Ford playing the Democrat Game

What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.


Where does she think they will find these "facts"? We're talking about what is essentially a thirty year or so old case of "she-said-he-said". Unless she has the proverbial blue dress hanging in her closet, photos, a corroborating witness, or a Disneyland ride line of women all making the same accusation, it's her word against his.

Now, don't misinterpret me, I'm not saying she's lying, and I'm not say he did or didn't do it. The fact is, none of us know, nor should we be drawing any conclusions based on unproven allegations. The fact that she apparently passed a lie detector test (inadmissible in a court of law) tells us one of three things, either she knows how to beat the test (given her education, entirely possible), or she believes what she is saying but is wrong and Kavanaugh wasn't involved (not beyond the realm of possibilities, people often remember events incorrectly), or it all happened the way she describes.

I'm curious as to why Professor Ford waited until now to speak out, why not torpedo his initial appointment to the bench?

At this point, I'm not caring one way or the other about his appointment.


I have a question for you, Lakhota: Are you even a little bit bothered by Diane Feinstein's withholding the letter, which all reports say she's had since July, until the 11th hour?
We do know. She's lying. That's as obvious as the sun rising in the East. You only help the barbarians by saying you don't know if she's lying.

So let the FBI investigate. Lying to the FBI is a felony.
then why isn't hillary in jail?
 

Forum List

Back
Top