Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

LOL! KavaGangTrain blew it huge based on this speech....

Kavanaugh in 2015: A judge must keep "emotions in check" and not be a "political partisan"
In 2015, Kavanaugh gave a speech—titled “The Judge as Umpire”—at the Columbus Law School at Catholic University. It was during this event that he now-infamously said, “What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep.” But later in the speech, Kavanaugh explained the importance of judicial temperament. He described the attributes required for a “good judge”: to have the “proper demeanor,” to keep “our emotions in check,” to be “calm amidst the storm,” and to “demonstrate civility.” And, Kavanaugh added, “Don’t be a jerk.”

And?
I guess you missed the review of KavaGangTrain,,

'SNL': Matt Damon Plays Beer-Shotgunning, Bro-y Brett Kavanaugh in Cold Open

If you're trying to be funny, at least learn how to link the page.

What he said is true. Judge must keep emotions in check and not be a political partisan, I believe that referrs when doing his job on the bench. What you're missing, he wasn't a judge at that hearing, he was being judged.

Are you saying that he should just sit back and take all the insults by the left and not to say a word? You lefties were expecting him to fold, well he hasn't. And now he's "unhinged".

Right.
 
Brett Kavanaugh was questioned by police after bloody bar fight in Connecticut
While an undergraduate at Yale University, Brett Kavanaugh was questioned by police over his alleged involvement in a bloody bar fight, according to a police report unearthed Monday.

The report, which was obtained by The New York Times, states officers with the New Haven Police Department questioned Kavanaugh over allegedly throwing ice at another patron at a local bar in September 1985.

After Kavanaugh tossed ice at the man, a witness told responding officers that Kavanaugh’s friend Chris Dudley hit him with a glass, leaving him “bleeding from the right ear,” according to the report.

A White House spokesman did not immediately return a request for comment. Kavanaugh’s lawyer did not respond to emailed questions.
Brett Kavanaugh was questioned by police after bloody bar fight in Connecticut - NY Daily News

:113:Hmm? Nice if true.

Wow, you mean he was actually questioned by police about a bar fight? To hell you say! Throw him out right now.
 
42812296_2096492540361083_6761100018003738624_o.jpg
 
Harvard Says Kavanaugh Won’t Be Teaching His Supreme Court Class In January

The embattled Supreme Court nominee has been teaching the class on the high court’s modern history since 2009.

Harvard Law School dean John F. Manning informed students last week that, although he couldn’t say whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh would still be teaching his January class, called The Supreme Court Since 2005, the school was still taking its students’ concerns seriously. But now the school has told students that Kavanaugh’s course, which he’s been teaching since 2009, would not be offered in 2019.

Harvard Says Kavanaugh Won’t Be Teaching His 2019 Supreme Court Class

Kavanaugh's world is changing - for the worse.
 
New Reports Add To Muddled View Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Character At Yale

New text messages suggest the Supreme Court nominee and his lawyers contacted old classmates in an effort to discredit Deborah Ramirez, NBC reports.

Multiple reports on Monday evening shed light on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s recent efforts to rein in his friends’ comments about his behavior as a student at Yale University.

NBC News reported that Kavanaugh and his legal team had been texting with the judge’s college friends to undercut classmate Deborah Ramirez’s allegations of sexual misconduct before she went public in The New Yorker. The messages, summarized in a memo obtained by NBC, suggest that Kavanaugh’s relationship to Ramirez was closer than he let on and that she was uncomfortable around him when they were both at a wedding 10 years after they graduated.

Ramirez was the second woman to accuse Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, saying he exposing himself at a gathering when they were both in college and thrust his penis in her face. She said she was inebriated but confident enough in her recollection to go public and ask the FBI to investigate the claims.

New Reports Add To Muddled View Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Character At Yale

Trying to pressure witnesses sounds bad.
 
LOL! John Oliver just ripped KavaGangTrain good...LOL!

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver S05E24 September 30, 2018 [HD] Start @2:28
 
LOL! John Oliver just ripped KavaGangTrain good...LOL!

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver S05E24 September 30, 2018 [HD] Start @2:28


Isn't Oliver the pussy who told Trump "Please run...I will donate to your campaign."

Seems that in spite of his royal fuck up, you cocksuckers still love to do just that.
 
LOL! John Oliver just ripped KavaGangTrain good...LOL!

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver S05E24 September 30, 2018 [HD] Start @2:28


Isn't Oliver the pussy who told Trump "Please run...I will donate to your campaign."

Seems that in spite of his royal fuck up, you cocksuckers still love to do just that.

You should review John's point, then, more..
 
Kavanaugh On How To Be A Good Judge: Keep Emotions ‘In Check,’ ‘Don’t Be A Jerk’

And “first and most obviously” don’t be a “political partisan,” he told law school students in 2015.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh described to law school students what it takes to be a good judge: Be “calm amidst the storm,” keep emotions “in check” and “don’t be a jerk.”

Also, “first and most obviously,” a judge cannot be a “political partisan,” he told members of the Columbus Law School at Catholic University three years ago in a speech titled “The Judge as Umpire” (see the video above).





Kavanaugh On How To Be A Good Judge: Keep Emotions 'In Check,' 'Don't Be A Jerk'

Kavanaugh was born and raised to be a jerk. An entitled jerk.
 
So the multiple rape witnesses from psycho three are not confirming her accusations?
 
Harvard Says Kavanaugh Won’t Be Teaching His Supreme Court Class In January

The embattled Supreme Court nominee has been teaching the class on the high court’s modern history since 2009.

Harvard Law School dean John F. Manning informed students last week that, although he couldn’t say whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh would still be teaching his January class, called The Supreme Court Since 2005, the school was still taking its students’ concerns seriously. But now the school has told students that Kavanaugh’s course, which he’s been teaching since 2009, would not be offered in 2019.

Harvard Says Kavanaugh Won’t Be Teaching His 2019 Supreme Court Class

Kavanaugh's world is changing - for the worse.

This is the desired result of the democrat smear machine. Did Garland lose anything beyond a seat on the SC?
 
Yes...the FBI can find out that she lied about the 2 doors on her house...which she didn't live in...

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/the_three_lies_of_christine_blasey_ford.html

(As is true of just about everything else in this story, the reasoning behind the second door remains a mystery. Evidently, its purpose was to allow Blasey Ford a means of escape if Kavanaugh landed his Harrier in front of her home and attempted to once again lay hands on her. The fact that a back or side door would serve this purpose much better has never, to my knowledge, entered the discussion.)

Well, Christine got her door. But she didn’t get in 2012, and no marriage counselor was involved. It happens that the permit for remodeling her home – including adding the door -- was obtained in 2008. If Palo Alto is like other municipalities, the permit would be good for six months, with an option for a six-month extension. So the door must have been added at that time. And in fact, photographic evidence exists showing the new door in place in 2011, a year before Blasey Ford claims that it nearly destroyed her marriage.

Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting that the house in question was rented out by Blasey Ford to “Google interns” and that no one in her family lived there. In addition, somebody was running a business there (a “couples therapy” clinic, ironically enough – the “Couples Research Center.” There’s that word “research” again.), and that the door was added as an entrance to the business, rather than as a Kavanaugh-evasion device.

While these claims might appear minor in isolation, together they form a pattern recognizable and undeniable. There will no doubt be others coming, but three is all we need, according to the wisdom of Auric Goldfinger: “Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action.”
 
LOL! KavaGangTrain blew it huge based on this speech....

Kavanaugh in 2015: A judge must keep "emotions in check" and not be a "political partisan"
In 2015, Kavanaugh gave a speech—titled “The Judge as Umpire”—at the Columbus Law School at Catholic University. It was during this event that he now-infamously said, “What happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep.” But later in the speech, Kavanaugh explained the importance of judicial temperament. He described the attributes required for a “good judge”: to have the “proper demeanor,” to keep “our emotions in check,” to be “calm amidst the storm,” and to “demonstrate civility.” And, Kavanaugh added, “Don’t be a jerk.”

And?
I guess you missed the review of KavaGangTrain,,

'SNL': Matt Damon Plays Beer-Shotgunning, Bro-y Brett Kavanaugh in Cold Open

If you're trying to be funny, at least learn how to link the page.

What he said is true. Judge must keep emotions in check and not be a political partisan, I believe that referrs when doing his job on the bench. What you're missing, he wasn't a judge at that hearing, he was being judged.

Are you saying that he should just sit back and take all the insults by the left and not to say a word? You lefties were expecting him to fold, well he hasn't. And now he's "unhinged".

Right.

As if it was ever possible for him to have a reaction, ANY reaction, that they weren't going to criticize.
 


Yep....

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/10/blasey_fords_double_door_doubletalk.html

Tom writes at Real Clear Politics:

…a glance at the real estate databases about Ford’s house are instructive.

The Fords bought the house on June 20, 2007. And the “very extensive, very long remodel,” including the second front door, were completed under a building permit granted in 2008.

So a natural question is why, four years after the remodeling, which also added two rooms and a bathroom, is the installation of that second door still such a bone of contention between the couple that it was an issue in the counseling they were undergoing in May 2012? (snip)

the additional remodeling in effect added a self-contained unit to the house, with its own entrance, perfect for “hosting” or even possibly renting, in violation of the local zoning.

Perhaps a professional office might be a perfect use, if an illegal one. And in the tight Palo Alto real estate market, there are a lot of games played for some serious income.

And that may answer another strange anomaly. Because since 1993, and through some listings even today, there was another tenant at what is now the Ford property. It is listed as this person’s residence from 1993 to July 2007, a week or so after she sold the house to the Fords.

Her name is Dr. Sylvia Randall, and she listed this address for her California licensed practice of psychotherapy, including couples psychotherapy, until her move to Oregon in 2007.

Currently she only practices in that state, where she also pursues her new career as a talented artist as well.

But many existing directories still have Dr. Randall’s address listed at what is now the Ford residence.

Which raises other questions. Why has Christine Ford never said a word about Dr. Randall? And why has she been evasive about the transcripts of her crucial 2012 therapy session, which she can’t seem to recall much about either? Did she provide them to the Washington Post, or did she just provide the therapist’s summary? Who was the psychologist?

In a phone call, I asked Dr. Randall if she had sold her house to the Fords. She asked back how I had found out. I asked if she was the couples therapist who treated the Fords. She would not answer yes or no, replying, “I am a couples therapist.”

The therapist’s notes might reveal a lot, but are protected by medical confidentiality. However, did Blasey Ford vitiate that protection if she handed the notes to the WaPo reporter? I am no expert, but that might explain why she was so evasive on that point under questioning by Rachel Mitchell.
 

Forum List

Back
Top