edthecynic
Censored for Cynicism
- Oct 20, 2008
- 43,044
- 6,883
He initially estimated that approximately a million and a half crimes were prevented by the defensive use of firearms. He later upped that estimate to about two and a half million.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He initially estimated that approximately a million and a half crimes were prevented by the defensive use of firearms. He later upped that estimate to about two and a half million.
In some instances, they already have.Should car wreck victims be able to sue car companies?
Don't be stupid .Guns enable over 20,000 suicides and over 10,000 murders in USA each year.
For all intensive purposes, abortion is, just like the 2nd amendment.Abortion isn't a constitutional right. So, I'd say Kavanaughs concerns are unwarranted.
Suicides would happen with out firearms retard.Guns enable over 20,000 suicides and over 10,000 murders in USA each year.
No one needs to hunt to feed themselves at this point, guy. We have supermarkets.Guns also enable one to defend one's self against criminal attack; and for some, they allow hunting as a means of providing food.
It's from a famous study carried out, I think, in the 1990s, by Gary Keck. He initially estimated that approximately a million and a half crimes were prevented by the defensive use of firearms. He later upped that estimate to about two and a half million.
Your big error is in assuming that the only way a gun can be used to prevent a crime is by killing the would-be criminal. The vast majority of legitimate defensive use of firearms have not involved killing the criminal, nor even discharging the firearm.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it deny that these innocent human beings are what they clearly are. This denial comes from the exact same evil that once denied that blacks were fully human. The very same degenerate ideology is responsible for both. See also, “Untermenschen” in 1930s-1940s Germany. Or an of the other instance throughout history where one group denied the humanity of another, in order to excuse and justify horrific abuses against that other group. That, Incel Joe, is the side on which you stand.
Should car wreck victims be able to sue car companies?
You can't protect one company, while making another company fair game. Either both can be sued, or neither can be sued.
Obama's Justice Department did the same study Gleck did and came up with similar numbers Joe shit stain.
Ahh that LIE again you keep repeating it when it has been debunked almost since the day it was uttered.Nope. Obama just reprinted all studies on DGU's, including Kleck's (not Gleck), which is utter bullshit.
The CDC is actually prohibited from studying gun violence. Has been since Kellerman found that a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a family member than a bad guy.
Obviously not.
Thanks for the proof I was rightObviously not.
If the wreck was due to a mechanical malfunction, yesShould car wreck victims be able to sue car companies?
If that's what you got outta my post then I can't help you.Thanks for the proof I was right
I doubt you could help anyone.If that's what you got outta my post then I can't help you.
I didn't realize it but this topic is like the perfect storm, abortion and gun control.
Now all I need is figure out how to throw tipping into the mix.
lol
The same standard should apply to gun manufacturers.If the wreck was due to a mechanical malfunction, yes
Operator error, no
No manufacturer should be held responsible for abuse of their product.If the car wasn't designed properly, sure. Let's not forget the story of the Pinto, where Ford decided that it would be cheaper to pay out people who burned to death than to recall millions of cars to do an $11.00 repair.
Except only one of those designs a product to kill people, and then markets them to the most irresponsible people imaginable.
The Supreme Court doesn't have the authority to give citizens a right.For all intensive purposes, abortion is, just like the 2nd amendment.
Abortion was decided by the SC to be constitutional.