whitehall
Diamond Member
Who the hell is Avanatti to warn the President of the United States? As far as I can determine he has never been elected to freaking dog catcher much less a federal office.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who the hell is Avanatti to warn the President of the United States? As far as I can determine he has never been elected to freaking dog catcher much less a federal office.
I think once the FBI fully investigated Justice Scalia's death, he should have gotten a hearing. Might take a year tho.There's no guarantee that Garland was a shoe-in.Ummmm, yes it probably does.
But why quibble
Not even remotely. Just because he wasn't a successful rapist doesn't mean he didn't try when the opportunity presented itself or when he was grossly intoxicated (as it is rumored he had a tendency to become).
The Dirty Democrats can't win fairly so they use hate and fear and smear.
Kavanaugh is innocent.
Ford is a liar.
How low can the Troglocrats go.
Likely payback for Merrick Garland.
We'll never know because he wasn't even given a hearing. Spineless weasel McConnell saw to that.
My question is why doesn't Ford want to face the man she's accusing of groping her 36 years ago at a party she can't remember??
Hell I'd face him if it were me. But then I would have reported it 36 years ago.
This whole thing is a he said. She said. No proof and no one remembers anything and it stinks to high heaven.
If I were Grassly I'd forget this whole mess and get the vote going at get Kav on the SC post haste.
Really would you of?
You goddamned right I would have.
So you were never assaulted and we do not know if you would of reported it or not, do we?
Nope. I've never been assaulted but at fifteen I sure wouldn't have been at that party either.
You can also bet your ass if I had been assaulted I would have reported it to my parents. They would have reported it to the police if my Dad didn't go looking for the assaulter.
Nope. Ford is full of shit or she has her own agenda.
Probably.`
`The lawyer also told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that “at least one” new accuser of the Supreme Court nominee will come forward within the next 48 hours. - Attorney Michael Avenatti has issued a stark warning to those attempting to discredit a new accuser of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
On Monday night, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that the woman was “both” a witness and a victim of Kavanaugh’s who “had a number of security clearances issued by the federal government over a number of years.” He also claims she will publicly come forward within 48 hours.
“So let this be a warning to Donald Trump, Brett Kavanaugh and other surrogates on the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Avenatti said. “Be very, very careful if you launch some smear campaign against my client because you will ultimately be shown to be a fraud.” - Source
`
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but is he talking about a third accuser?
The guy is a scumbag.
I'm sure he can find someone.
He's talking about gang rape accusations now.
The judge will probably end up suing his balls off for malicious slander.
You are the only person to have mentioned Roache. You didn't even include a link to Daily Kos, Salon or Mother Jones.Nobody has commented on James roaches comment the guy who is Brett’s roommate at Yale.
“It is from this experience that I concluded that although Brett was normally reserved, he was a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk. I did not observe the specific incident in question, but I do remember Brett frequently drinking excessively and becoming incoherently drunk.”
Maybe because it came from a guy.
'Avenatti-Katz & DNC Attorneys Seek to Delay & Push Back Hearing and Confirmation Again'
NO! If they refuse to show it's over. Hold the vote. No more delays.
great way to smear w/o a link or reference as to where this nugget came from. and why do i not find it odd you'll find him *not* credible but someone who's had 5 witnesses say "uh, no" and can't name a single fact other than his name *IS* credible.The kid couldn't get laid to save his life. That's his defense. Somehow, I just don't find him credible.
loose use of "facts" to suit an agenda. the hallmark of a peckerhead.
You are the only person to have mentioned Roache. You didn't even include a link to Daily Kos, Salon or Mother Jones.Nobody has commented on James roaches comment the guy who is Brett’s roommate at Yale.
“It is from this experience that I concluded that although Brett was normally reserved, he was a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk. I did not observe the specific incident in question, but I do remember Brett frequently drinking excessively and becoming incoherently drunk.”
Maybe because it came from a guy.
You don't deserve a comment.
There is no shortage of media glory seekers out there. God Bless America, Gloria Allred, Ann Coulter, Donald Trump and this guy!`
`The lawyer also told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that “at least one” new accuser of the Supreme Court nominee will come forward within the next 48 hours. - Attorney Michael Avenatti has issued a stark warning to those attempting to discredit a new accuser of Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
On Monday night, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer told CNN’s Chris Cuomo that the woman was “both” a witness and a victim of Kavanaugh’s who “had a number of security clearances issued by the federal government over a number of years.” He also claims she will publicly come forward within 48 hours.
“So let this be a warning to Donald Trump, Brett Kavanaugh and other surrogates on the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Avenatti said. “Be very, very careful if you launch some smear campaign against my client because you will ultimately be shown to be a fraud.” - Source
`
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but is he talking about a third accuser?
great way to smear w/o a link or reference as to where this nugget came from. and why do i not find it odd you'll find him *not* credible but someone who's had 5 witnesses say "uh, no" and can't name a single fact other than his name *IS* credible.The kid couldn't get laid to save his life. That's his defense. Somehow, I just don't find him credible.
loose use of "facts" to suit an agenda. the hallmark of a peckerhead.
In an interview last night on FOX News, Cavenaugh claimed he was a virgin throughout high school and college and for many years thereafter. He also said he didn’t drink. None of this squares with the accounts of his best friend who is now in hiding and refusing to testify. I guess he doesn’t want to lie under oath and the truth won’t help his friend.