Kavanaugh Official Merge for Oct 2nd, 2018

Given the circumstances, did the judge show admirable restraint?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
The lies are getting more and more shrill.

As I said, I hope the GOP along with their advocates are taking notes for the midterm campaign ads!
The Left sure is.
They'll be busy playing defense given the shameful way they have acted in the past 2 weeks. Pretty easy to show them acting in bad faith, putting their own power ahead of the lives and reputations of innocent people. Their willingness to revictimize a woman for their theatrics.

Yeah, you run with your ads, and we'll see if the GOP has the balls to start fighting back.
 
The "proper place" being somewhere a man wants her to be I assume?

Not quite. Under that definition some women could be in places not meant for them because her male counterpart has no spine or Morals.

A woman’s proper place is as described in Traditional Western Cukture as the homemaker, nurturer and support for her Husband. Whereas His place is as the Head of Household, breadwinner and protector of the family.
Dipshit
 
Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

Your avatar is disturbing, dumb Leftist. And of course you want to refute an accuser's claim if it is not true.
 
Why are you folks starting threads on the one accuser who no one believes and so far as I know all the investigators are ignoring?
So you can by association smear the rest as unbelievable.
 
Why are you folks starting threads on the one accuser who no one believes

I don't believe any of them, and I know no one who does.

Then again, at this point in time I have no Democrats in my life to speak of.
 
Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

Your avatar is disturbing, dumb Leftist. And of course you want to refute an accuser's claim if it is not true.
yea, she's touting womans right while sporting a stripper. kinda funny.
 
Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

Your avatar is disturbing, dumb Leftist. And of course you want to refute an accuser's claim if it is not true.
yea, she's touting womans right while sporting a stripper. kinda funny.

BINGO!!! A woman who has been abused her entire life.
 
Debbie Ramirez pretty much destroyed her own story when she called old friends to ask them if it were true.

What is true is that Ramirez didn't remember this at all until attorneys questioned her for six daysm
 
Why are you folks starting threads on the one accuser who no one believes

I don't believe any of them, and I know no one who does.

Then again, at this point in time I have no Democrats in my life to speak of.


"Then again, at this point in time I have no Democrats in my life to speak of."

Well, thanks for sharing that you have no diversity of thought in your life. That explains your total tunnel vision.and lack of objectivity. Egads!
 
Yeah thanks Stormy - I was about to post this but the early bird got the worm. Saw Heidi Przybyla on Morning Joe today. She's a helluva journalist. Easy on the eyes too. What caught my eye was this:

Finally, Berchem is concerned about what she witnessed at the 1997 wedding where Ramirez and Kavanaugh were both in the wedding party.

According to the information Berchem provided, Ramirez tried to avoid Kavanaugh at that wedding of their two friends, Yarasavage and Kevin Genda.

Ramirez, “clung to me” at the wedding, Berchem wrote to Yarasavage in a Sept. 24th text message. “She never went near them,” a reference to Kavanaugh and his friends. Even in the group photo, Berchem wrote, Ramirez was trying to keep away from Kavanaugh.

ALSO, we now know that a LOT of people are trying to get information to the FBI and even the field offices seem uninterested. Word has it that there has been no official written White House directive on expansion - just some obscure verbal references. For the most part, FBI agents hate Trump at this point, but it would appear that their hands are still tied. We'll see nothing from McGahn. The fix is in.
 
Swetnick was given immediate air time by an irresponsible Media. Her allegations were brought up in Kavanaugh's questioning by Feinstein. There are plenty of Liberals including professors that work with my wife who jumped all over the drug/gang rape story.
 
the ever deplorable mutt-faced mitch mcconnell wants to just force a vote thru this friday anyway!
 
Yeah thanks Stormy - I was about to post this but the early bird got the worm. Saw Heidi Przybyla on Morning Joe today. She's a helluva journalist. Easy on the eyes too. What caught my eye was this:

Finally, Berchem is concerned about what she witnessed at the 1997 wedding where Ramirez and Kavanaugh were both in the wedding party.

According to the information Berchem provided, Ramirez tried to avoid Kavanaugh at that wedding of their two friends, Yarasavage and Kevin Genda.

Ramirez, “clung to me” at the wedding, Berchem wrote to Yarasavage in a Sept. 24th text message. “She never went near them,” a reference to Kavanaugh and his friends. Even in the group photo, Berchem wrote, Ramirez was trying to keep away from Kavanaugh.

ALSO, we now know that a LOT of people are trying to get information to the FBI and even the field offices seem uninterested. Word has it that there has been no official written White House directive on expansion - just some obscure verbal references. For the most part, FBI agents hate Trump at this point, but it would appear that their hands are still tied. We'll see nothing from McGahn. The fix is in.

Wow!
That's some substantial evidence right there.
LOL!
 
Why are you folks starting threads on the one accuser who no one believes

I don't believe any of them, and I know no one who does.

Then again, at this point in time I have no Democrats in my life to speak of.


"Then again, at this point in time I have no Democrats in my life to speak of."

Well, thanks for sharing that you have no diversity of thought in your life. That explains your total tunnel vision.and lack of objectivity. Egads!

I don't have crackheads, heroin addicts, murderers, rapists, transsexuals, BDSMers, or Communists in my life either.

Insanity masquerading as "diversity of thought" holds no interest for me.
 
Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.
They.....don't....care.....how.....much.....he....lies. It's become quite evident.

It's even more clear that...they...don't...care...how...much...Trump...lies...to...them.
They are that,,, weak-minded.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top