Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,591
- 2,260
- 210
So I suppose all the transcript testimony that is now coming out of the CLOSED DOOR IMPEACHMENT HEARINNGS should be word for word and not summarized as it is now!....All the classified info should be put before the public..... if that is so, why then have a CLOSED HEARING at all except to cover the Schitt's own lies. ...And who is responsible for the Trump transcript?...It was a group of INTEL PEOPLE, that released it, not like Schitt's transcript where only DemonRATS and their lawyerd wrote them up.....and as we have been apprised of with the saboteur Lt. Col. who wanted to change Trumps transcript to wording that would appear to make Trump guilty of some unknown crime, (You on the left have a history of changing wording, ie. Comey's indictment of the Beasty to EXTREMELY CARELESS, so it didn't fit the VERY DEFINITION of a felony!!!)Read the transcript well all he has to do is release the call and there should be no arguments as to what was said.
So my T shirt says "Release the original Call"
so that we can hear what was said and draw are own conclusions
So simple yet I guess he believes a secret state must have secrets
Open government to trump is him standing at the door with his foot holding the door shut with his minions standing in front.
Yes Dorthy, he has minions.
Nothing to see here but if there was I would tell you what there is to see
Ah, but I waste my time on trying to explain things to a radical who even when hit between the eyes with a 2x4, says, you still don't have my attention!
Yes it should be word for word
Some people prefer word for word vs a transcript
I do not have a qualm about if the information is classified
In order to get testimony then it is best to protect the witness privacy
There are those who will drag the witness name thru the mud for political reasons
Whistle blowers are protected by law
If there is a legitimate reason for classification then so be it
Yet it was Trump associates who classified the original call
And Trump has the power to remove that classification
Trump released the transcript
Saying the left changes wording well what about the right
Fine example is the Nunes memo which clearly show using chosen words to support the right in their beliefs yet ignoring other words which contradicts the rights beliefs
cherry picking
Rep. Trey Gowdy contradicted President Donald Trump by saying he did not believe the memo spearheaded by Rep. Devin Nunes has any impact on the Russia investigation
This from the rights very own who says that Nunes memo was irrelevant and cherry picking yet many on the right use it as proof that the investigation is tainted
Nunes (a repub) memo clearly cherry picks in order to choose wording to make Trump look innocent