Kerry and Russia agree on framework of Syrian deal on chemical weapons!

[PMZ]

Then why was Obama pushing for attacking Syria as the first option????
You Obama fluffers are really tooo much...

Obama threatened to deprive Assad of his chemical weapons. Bush invaded Sadam's country. You don't see a difference?

One is a Republican and the other a Democrat.

I guess you forgot the long run-up to the war. Bush pretty much said the same thing Obama is saying only he actually went through Congress and the U.N. The difference was we were under a cease-fire with Iraq after Desert Storm and Saddam was breaking the conditions of the cease-fire. This BS with Syria is simply of Obama's own making.

The situations are similar and Obama is trying to do it his way, and Bush did it his way. Bush tried to follow the rules and Obama tried to break the rules.

The difference is that Bush settled for a military solution and Obama forced a diplomatic solution. Savings? Trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

 

[JimH52]

Wherever Obama goes he causes trouble. He cannot do otherwise.

This is what happens when you elect a professional troublemaker to an important office.

You mean as opposed to electing a professional recovering alcoholic. That worked out well, huh? We are still paying for his blunders.

 

[georgephillip]

"He’ll sign the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Within days, he’ll submit documents required to do so, he said.

"He’ll place Syria’s chemical weapons under international control.

"He’ll provide monitors with information about them one month after becoming a CWC signatory.

”'I believe the agreement will come into force a month after the signing and Syria will start submitting data on its chemical weapons stockpile to international organizations,' he said.

“'These are standard procedures, and we are going to stick to them,' he stressed.
He agreed to Russian proposed terms. They’re fair, logical and workable. They seek peaceful conflict resolution.

"US threats didn’t influence him.

"He said '(t)errorists are tying to incite a US attack against Syria. There are countries that supply chemical substances to opposition rebels.'

"Obama’s threat to attack Syria was 'based on a US provocation.'

"He’ll fulfill his obligation to place his chemical weapons under international control. He’ll do so when Washington stops threatening to attack.

“'When we see that the United States truly desires stability in our region and stops threatening and seeking to invade, as well as stops arms supplies to terrorists then we can believe that we can follow through with the necessary processes,' he said.

Washington should end its 'politics of threats.'”

Assad Pledges Full Cooperation, Pentagon Plans Countdown to War? | Global Research

 

[mudwhistle]

Obama threatened to deprive Assad of his chemical weapons. Bush invaded Sadam's country. You don't see a difference?

One is a Republican and the other a Democrat.

I guess you forgot the long run-up to the war. Bush pretty much said the same thing Obama is saying only he actually went through Congress and the U.N. The difference was we were under a cease-fire with Iraq after Desert Storm and Saddam was breaking the conditions of the cease-fire. This BS with Syria is simply of Obama's own making.

The situations are similar and Obama is trying to do it his way, and Bush did it his way. Bush tried to follow the rules and Obama tried to break the rules.

The difference is that Bush settled for a military solution and Obama forced a diplomatic solution. Savings? Trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

So far there has been no military action in Syria.

You act like the problem is solved. It is not. We went through this with Saddam too.

 

[mudwhistle]

"He’ll sign the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Within days, he’ll submit documents required to do so, he said.

"He’ll place Syria’s chemical weapons under international control.

"He’ll provide monitors with information about them one month after becoming a CWC signatory.

”'I believe the agreement will come into force a month after the signing and Syria will start submitting data on its chemical weapons stockpile to international organizations,' he said.

“'These are standard procedures, and we are going to stick to them,' he stressed.
He agreed to Russian proposed terms. They’re fair, logical and workable. They seek peaceful conflict resolution.

"US threats didn’t influence him.

"He said '(t)errorists are tying to incite a US attack against Syria. There are countries that supply chemical substances to opposition rebels.'

"Obama’s threat to attack Syria was 'based on a US provocation.'

"He’ll fulfill his obligation to place his chemical weapons under international control. He’ll do so when Washington stops threatening to attack.

“'When we see that the United States truly desires stability in our region and stops threatening and seeking to invade, as well as stops arms supplies to terrorists then we can believe that we can follow through with the necessary processes,' he said.

Washington should end its 'politics of threats.'”

Assad Pledges Full Cooperation, Pentagon Plans Countdown to War? | Global Research

It would also help if Obama would stop resupplying the rebels under the table as well.

 

[georgephillip]

"He’ll sign the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Within days, he’ll submit documents required to do so, he said.

"He’ll place Syria’s chemical weapons under international control.

"He’ll provide monitors with information about them one month after becoming a CWC signatory.

”'I believe the agreement will come into force a month after the signing and Syria will start submitting data on its chemical weapons stockpile to international organizations,' he said.

“'These are standard procedures, and we are going to stick to them,' he stressed.
He agreed to Russian proposed terms. They’re fair, logical and workable. They seek peaceful conflict resolution.

"US threats didn’t influence him.

"He said '(t)errorists are tying to incite a US attack against Syria. There are countries that supply chemical substances to opposition rebels.'

"Obama’s threat to attack Syria was 'based on a US provocation.'

"He’ll fulfill his obligation to place his chemical weapons under international control. He’ll do so when Washington stops threatening to attack.

“'When we see that the United States truly desires stability in our region and stops threatening and seeking to invade, as well as stops arms supplies to terrorists then we can believe that we can follow through with the necessary processes,' he said.

Washington should end its 'politics of threats.'”

Assad Pledges Full Cooperation, Pentagon Plans Countdown to War? | Global Research

It would also help if Obama would stop resupplying the rebels under the table as well.

I can't help wondering how many US opinions would change if it was proven both sides in the Syrian civil war have used chemical weapons on civilians?

"In May, Turkish police arrested 12 suspected Al Nusra fighters. They were caught red-handed. They had two grams of sarin. - See more at..."

Assad Pledges Full Cooperation, Pentagon Plans Countdown to War? | Global Research

 

[Katzndogz]

Assad agreed to the Russian proposal because somewhere in that proposal is a double cross that only Assad and Putin know about.

It was proposed knowing that obama was cornered and would jump at any chance to get out from under. He had no choice.

Putin is much smarter than obama. Much more experienced and vastly more sophisticated in world politics. obama only has arrogance and conceit.

 

[dilloduck]

The framework protects the current regime from being deposed. Assad and Russia can breathe a sigh of relief.

 

[georgephillip]

Assad agreed to the Russian proposal because somewhere in that proposal is a double cross that only Assad and Putin know about.

It was proposed knowing that obama was cornered and would jump at any chance to get out from under. He had no choice.

Putin is much smarter than obama. Much more experienced and vastly more sophisticated in world politics. obama only has arrogance and conceit.

No doubt about Obama's arrogance or Putin's ability to shred his ass in a cage fight, but what does that tell us about a US attempt to take Syria from Russia the same way we took over in Afghanistan?

 

[PMZ]

One is a Republican and the other a Democrat.

I guess you forgot the long run-up to the war. Bush pretty much said the same thing Obama is saying only he actually went through Congress and the U.N. The difference was we were under a cease-fire with Iraq after Desert Storm and Saddam was breaking the conditions of the cease-fire. This BS with Syria is simply of Obama's own making.

The situations are similar and Obama is trying to do it his way, and Bush did it his way. Bush tried to follow the rules and Obama tried to break the rules.

The difference is that Bush settled for a military solution and Obama forced a diplomatic solution. Savings? Trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

So far there has been no military action in Syria.

You act like the problem is solved. It is not. We went through this with Saddam too.

Which problem? The problem of Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons? How many have died that way since Obama took his stand?

 

[PMZ]

Assad agreed to the Russian proposal because somewhere in that proposal is a double cross that only Assad and Putin know about.

It was proposed knowing that obama was cornered and would jump at any chance to get out from under. He had no choice.

Putin is much smarter than obama. Much more experienced and vastly more sophisticated in world politics. obama only has arrogance and conceit.

Pure conjecture.

 

[Ed_Brown]

good luck to the UN inspectors getting access to the chem sites in November. Won't happen. At which time the war president can once again make the case for using force against syria so he can help his rebel/terror buddies toss assad out ...

should be an interesting holiday season.

 

[PMZ]

"He’ll sign the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Within days, he’ll submit documents required to do so, he said.

"He’ll place Syria’s chemical weapons under international control.

"He’ll provide monitors with information about them one month after becoming a CWC signatory.

”'I believe the agreement will come into force a month after the signing and Syria will start submitting data on its chemical weapons stockpile to international organizations,' he said.

“'These are standard procedures, and we are going to stick to them,' he stressed.
He agreed to Russian proposed terms. They’re fair, logical and workable. They seek peaceful conflict resolution.

"US threats didn’t influence him.

"He said '(t)errorists are tying to incite a US attack against Syria. There are countries that supply chemical substances to opposition rebels.'

"Obama’s threat to attack Syria was 'based on a US provocation.'

"He’ll fulfill his obligation to place his chemical weapons under international control. He’ll do so when Washington stops threatening to attack.

“'When we see that the United States truly desires stability in our region and stops threatening and seeking to invade, as well as stops arms supplies to terrorists then we can believe that we can follow through with the necessary processes,' he said.

Washington should end its 'politics of threats.'”

Assad Pledges Full Cooperation, Pentagon Plans Countdown to War? | Global Research

It would also help if Obama would stop resupplying the rebels under the table as well.

What would you do? Join the Russians supplying Assad?

 

[georgephillip]

The difference is that Bush settled for a military solution and Obama forced a diplomatic solution. Savings? Trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

So far there has been no military action in Syria.

You act like the problem is solved. It is not. We went through this with Saddam too.

Which problem? The problem of Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons? How many have died that way since Obama took his stand?

Have you seen conclusive proof it was Assad's forces who used Sarin last month?
IMHO, it's beginning to look like both sides in that conflict are using chemical weapons against civilians.

 

[dilloduck]

The difference is that Bush settled for a military solution and Obama forced a diplomatic solution. Savings? Trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

So far there has been no military action in Syria.

You act like the problem is solved. It is not. We went through this with Saddam too.

Which problem? The problem of Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons? How many have died that way since Obama took his stand?

Which stand are you talking about ?

 

[JimH52]

good luck to the UN inspectors getting access to the chem sites in November. Won't happen. At which time the war president can once again make the case for using force against syria so he can help his rebel/terror buddies toss assad out ...

should be an interesting holiday season.

You can only hope so. You are hoping for failure. This President is not a recovering alcoholic. He does not have someone punching him in the ribs, asking him to attack.

Chemical weapons ARE present here and they HAVE been used. Obama will use force if Syria backs away.

 

[dilloduck]

good luck to the UN inspectors getting access to the chem sites in November. Won't happen. At which time the war president can once again make the case for using force against syria so he can help his rebel/terror buddies toss assad out ...

should be an interesting holiday season.

You can only hope so. You are hoping for failure. This President is not a recovering alcoholic. He does not have someone punching him in the ribs, asking him to attack.

Chemical weapons ARE present here and they HAVE been used. Obama will use force if Syria backs away.

Yes----he really does have people who are still anxious for him to attack. Assad has months before his last chemical weapon is gone. He could use them today if he were so inclined.

 

[georgephillip]

good luck to the UN inspectors getting access to the chem sites in November. Won't happen. At which time the war president can once again make the case for using force against syria so he can help his rebel/terror buddies toss assad out ...

should be an interesting holiday season.

You can only hope so. You are hoping for failure. This President is not a recovering alcoholic. He does not have someone punching him in the ribs, asking him to attack.

Chemical weapons ARE present here and they HAVE been used. Obama will use force if Syria backs away.

Yes----he really does have people who are still anxious for him to attack. Assad has months before his last chemical weapon is gone. He could use them today if he were so inclined.

Assad would seem to possess an overwhelming monopoly of violence with his armor and air power; why would he risk his life turning out like Saddam's and Gaddafi's by using poison gas?

 

[R.C. Christian]

The difference is that Bush settled for a military solution and Obama forced a diplomatic solution. Savings? Trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.

So far there has been no military action in Syria.

You act like the problem is solved. It is not. We went through this with Saddam too.

Which problem? The problem of Assad killing his own people with chemical weapons? How many have died that way since Obama took his stand?

Proof PMS? LOL. Get to it. No go hump Barry's leg like a good dumb shit.

 

[R.C. Christian]

good luck to the UN inspectors getting access to the chem sites in November. Won't happen. At which time the war president can once again make the case for using force against syria so he can help his rebel/terror buddies toss assad out ...

should be an interesting holiday season.

You can only hope so. You are hoping for failure. This President is not a recovering alcoholic. He does not have someone punching him in the ribs, asking him to attack.

Chemical weapons ARE present here and they HAVE been used. Obama will use force if Syria backs away.

That's it, It's duck season Daffy. Earth to moron, can ya here me? ONCE AGAIN, THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NERVE GAS.