Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
Thank you but I don't think Jim needed an example of you dishonestly taking things I've said out of context. I appreciate you making the effort but I think he probably already knew you were one of the dishonest pricks I was talking about.
Let me guess, this was all 'out of context' as well?
I didn't say it would be easier for society to reject gays. I said: It would have been easier to condemned homosexuality.I am starting to think it would be easier for us to condemn homosexuality than to tolerate it.
![]()
Well yeah, asswipe... when there are 5,000 accusations made per thread of things I supposedly said but didn't say... I am bound to make an error now and then.
Of course, in CONTEXT (which you are oblivious to) the fact that I prefaced my comment with "I am starting to think" should imply (to most rational people) that I wasn't thinking that previously and haven't thought it before. Nor have I indicated I fully think that now. There is also a huge gaping difference between condemning homosexual activity and "rejecting gays" which was the accusation.
So again... thank you very much for illustrating the level of dishonesty in discourse goes on around here daily, but I don't think Jim needed an example.
Thank you for the example of your dishonesty.
Care to make any more claims that someone said the Alabama bill 'does nothing'?![]()
Go fuck yourself, Montronaut.
And as someone who likes to complain about being insulted, thank you for the example of your hypocrisy.