Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
I wish you luck on your road to legalize sibling marriage.
Pop is not going to lobby for this and neither am I. We're just explaining how "equal protection" works to people who just used it to obtain their kind of marriage. Someone WILL challenge it, and they WILL win, IF the court follows the Constitution. The Obergefell case WILL be cited as part of their case and WILL be considered in the court's deliberation. These are just facts that need to be faced in light of the ruling. Our pointing this out to your stupid ass is not our "support" of such things. Stop trying to manipulate conversations and denigrate others because they don't agree with you. It's cheap, petty and immature.
Did you know how Obergefell would be ruled? You have said it shouldn't have been heard at all, it was an incorrect decision, etc....either you don't have as strong a grasp of constitutional protections in relation to this case as you think or the court did not bother to follow the constitution. Either of these possibilities seems to argue against your predicting what the court will rule in the near future, at least until the makeup of the court changes.
The court didn't follow the Constitution. This was not a matter of equal protection as no one was able to obtain a same-sex marriage since that doesn't exist in reality. They had to first create this thing that didn't previously exist, then they had to determine some people had a fundamental right to the thing. All of it is outside the jurisdiction of the court and an overreach of their Constitutional power.
If you want to twist and distort things around to make some other argument, we're not going to have it.... you can do it... I won't respond to it.
My point is that if you think this court overreaches and goes against the constitution any predictions you make are going to be questionable at best because they don't follow what you think is their proper role and power.