Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish these rightwing, fundamentalist, so called Christians would stop all this belly aching about being oppressed. Whine, whine, whine. It's just so much BS.I believe that Catholic judge would be surprised to be called anti-christian.
Yeah getting close to a week how's that throwing her in jail working for you butt fuckers? She is STILL the elected clerk of court and ANY license given to "couples" without her signature is void....pretty funny stuffs....these faggots think its gonna stand in court....they are slowly but surely pushing the country back right on social issues because people are seeing it IS about attacking religious folks and religion.
Why should they be forced to participate in a sin? Who made you God?And neither do bakers....Obiwan, a Minister/Priest/Rabbi does not work for the government or get paid to do a government job, as with Kim Davis....And what happens when a minister is faced with the option of performing a gay wedding or facing a lawsuit (or jail time)..There is no persecution and they are not revolting, just in your imagination.Actually, I don't give a rat's ass who appointed him...
I just know that the Christian community (including a lot of black churches) is revolting against the persecution...
The Democrats will pay dearly for that.
After all, the gays are already going after everybody from clerks to bakers...
And gays aren't that popular with blacks anyway.good comeback!
however the bakers were not forced to attend a Religious ceremony or perform a sacrilegious act , it was a Civil marriage if I am not mistaken? And the bakers only needed to deliver a cake to a reception, a party....they were not forced to perform or be a part of the wedding...
People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
There is no right to a license.People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
What a load of horse shit. Kim Davis was the one persecuting people by denying them their civil right to marriage. PERIOD.
If you want to live in a theocracy go join ISIS. The Christian Taliban has a lot in common with them.
She's had four marriage licenses. You would think she would let gays have one.Judges cannot just arbitrarily pass any judgement they wish. There are guidelines. And the guidelines assert that you can't issue a harsher sentence for the purpose of making an example of someone...nor can you make a sentence HARSHER because a person has support. Activist judges deserve prison time and worse.
So, now you'd like to throw the judge in prison?
Did Davis breach her position description and the oath she took when she was instated in her position? ....Yes or No?
Is a fine harsher or more lenient than prison time?...........Yes or No?
Were Davis a Muslim and she refused to work during Ramadan, should she have been allowed to do so?............Yes or No?
First question: NO, Ky law says she MAY ISSUE marriage licenses, she chose not to, a perfectly legal decision unless the law is changed.
Questions 2 & 3 irrelevant.
So much hatred from the so called tolerant
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
There is no right to a license.People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
What a load of horse shit. Kim Davis was the one persecuting people by denying them their civil right to marriage. PERIOD.
If you want to live in a theocracy go join ISIS. The Christian Taliban has a lot in common with them.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Adults like us don't praise sin and childish behaviorSo much hatred from the so called tolerant
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Haven't you heard, we don't have to tolerate intolerance?
A court opinion does not make law or constitutional rights jackass .There is no right to a license.People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
What a load of horse shit. Kim Davis was the one persecuting people by denying them their civil right to marriage. PERIOD.
If you want to live in a theocracy go join ISIS. The Christian Taliban has a lot in common with them.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
You might want to read up on Current Events.
She's had four marriage licenses. You would think she would let gays have one.Judges cannot just arbitrarily pass any judgement they wish. There are guidelines. And the guidelines assert that you can't issue a harsher sentence for the purpose of making an example of someone...nor can you make a sentence HARSHER because a person has support. Activist judges deserve prison time and worse.
So, now you'd like to throw the judge in prison?
Did Davis breach her position description and the oath she took when she was instated in her position? ....Yes or No?
Is a fine harsher or more lenient than prison time?...........Yes or No?
Were Davis a Muslim and she refused to work during Ramadan, should she have been allowed to do so?............Yes or No?
First question: NO, Ky law says she MAY ISSUE marriage licenses, she chose not to, a perfectly legal decision unless the law is changed.
Questions 2 & 3 irrelevant.
Totally irrelevant, to this point she has done nothing illegal.
A court opinion does not make law or constitutional rights jackass .There is no right to a license.People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
What a load of horse shit. Kim Davis was the one persecuting people by denying them their civil right to marriage. PERIOD.
If you want to live in a theocracy go join ISIS. The Christian Taliban has a lot in common with them.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
You might want to read up on Current Events.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
A court opinion does not make law or constitutional rights jackass .There is no right to a license.People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
What a load of horse shit. Kim Davis was the one persecuting people by denying them their civil right to marriage. PERIOD.
If you want to live in a theocracy go join ISIS. The Christian Taliban has a lot in common with them.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
You might want to read up on Current Events.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Yet the Government just forced Christians who work in Government to accept a practice that is condemned in Christian, Jewish and Muslim religions.
That interferes with the fist amendment that says government shall make no law prohibiting the freedom of exercising their religion.
This whole thing has been handed badly where the rights of both sides should be exercised.
It is not right that one side of a small minority should over ride the rights of the majority.
Reasonable compromises can be done but it seems that gays are not willing to do so.
Yet the Government just forced Christians who work in Government to accept a practice that is condemned in Christian, Jewish and Muslim religions.
That interferes with the fist amendment that says government shall make no law prohibiting the freedom of exercising their religion.
This whole thing has been handed badly where the rights of both sides should be exercised.
It is not right that one side of a small minority should over ride the rights of the majority.
Reasonable compromises can be done but it seems that gays are not willing to do so.
She's had four marriage licenses. You would think she would let gays have one.Judges cannot just arbitrarily pass any judgement they wish. There are guidelines. And the guidelines assert that you can't issue a harsher sentence for the purpose of making an example of someone...nor can you make a sentence HARSHER because a person has support. Activist judges deserve prison time and worse.
So, now you'd like to throw the judge in prison?
Did Davis breach her position description and the oath she took when she was instated in her position? ....Yes or No?
Is a fine harsher or more lenient than prison time?...........Yes or No?
Were Davis a Muslim and she refused to work during Ramadan, should she have been allowed to do so?............Yes or No?
First question: NO, Ky law says she MAY ISSUE marriage licenses, she chose not to, a perfectly legal decision unless the law is changed.
Questions 2 & 3 irrelevant.
Totally irrelevant, to this point she has done nothing illegal.
Yes she has.
They never didn't have the right idiot they just were not recognized by the state. this judicial tyranny running rampant right now is going to end and it won't be good for the facism of the leftA court opinion does not make law or constitutional rights jackass .There is no right to a license.People better start waking up to what is going on. They came for Kim Davis and you said Nothing. well you know the rest of that saying
What a load of horse shit. Kim Davis was the one persecuting people by denying them their civil right to marriage. PERIOD.
If you want to live in a theocracy go join ISIS. The Christian Taliban has a lot in common with them.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
You might want to read up on Current Events.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
You can repeat that a hundred times a day if you like, but it won't change anything for you. Gays have the right to marry. End of story. And there is nothing the Christian Taliban can do about it.
She's had four marriage licenses. You would think she would let gays have one.So, now you'd like to throw the judge in prison?
Did Davis breach her position description and the oath she took when she was instated in her position? ....Yes or No?
Is a fine harsher or more lenient than prison time?...........Yes or No?
Were Davis a Muslim and she refused to work during Ramadan, should she have been allowed to do so?............Yes or No?
First question: NO, Ky law says she MAY ISSUE marriage licenses, she chose not to, a perfectly legal decision unless the law is changed.
Questions 2 & 3 irrelevant.
Totally irrelevant, to this point she has done nothing illegal.
Yes she has.
Name it.
