Kim Davis Is About To Get A BIG Surprise In Her Hometown

[AvgGuyIA]

We fled Europe because of religious persecution. The first clause if the 1st Amendment involves religion. What are we doing today? This regime is jailing Christians for their religious beliefs. And to think conservatives are agreeing with the Obama Regime. Outrageous!

 

[Nosmo King]

man, you can feel the hate they have for people coming through our computers. especially this woman who didn't bow down and kiss their ass. Getting her thrown in jail wasn't enough for you hateful and vindictive people. And she is a Democrat. You people thinking of becoming a Democrat, look how you'll be treated YOU CROSS THEM.

You the people in this country: were told what would happen once they got marriage which is suppose to be about love. That was suppose to be their final win and you thought they were going to leave you ALONE after that...... Well you see that was a Lie. now IT GET WORSE.

bow to them or get sued, fined, death threats, and them coming to the town you live to harass you and the people who lives there even though they didn't have a damn to do with these nasty women.

How long are you going take this shit from them? Time to wake up and it's NOW

All ms. Davis has shown is hate. Why defend her?

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Licenses are issued in the local clerks office for people who live or plan to get married in area. The ceremony can be performed anywhere in the state for up to 90 in most states. Some place also require blood test. Couples must show up together and show ID.

Why should you go across the state if there is a local clerk near you? It is there job to issue licenses. It is not like they are asking her to perform the vows. Her job was to process paperwork for the state.

Her religious beliefs do not supersede the state laws for her responsibility to do her job. Not should she prevent others in the office from doing their job for the state.

For more than 2000 yrs, state laws have trumped religious laws. In the US we have a separation of church and state for that reason. People cannot impose their religion in a way that interferes with the state or other people's individual rights and beliefs.

The governor told her to do her job and she disobeyed. The courts told her to do her job and she disobeyed. If she can't or won't perform her duty to the state, she should have resigned.

Civil or religious, she was just plain wrong.

The law requires Kim's religious rights be accommodated.

no it doesn't.

Yes it does.

And you're wrong.

The law doesn't say "a government employee can refuse to perform their job if that job violates their rights"

You do NOT have a right to a job. This is COMPLETELY different than a person who owns their own business.

The state MUST accommodate her!

Because you say so? Quote the law if they must accommodate her, fool.

Let me ask you a question. Should a Muslim woman be allowed to have a DL which pictures her in her traditional attire , including veil?

 

[aris2chat]

Obviously enough that tried to get a marriage license and began this whole issue with her, and their supporters.

Her and her church are wrong about gays and marriage, but they are set in their bigotry to convince themselves they are right about their hate of others.

Davis was a sinner many times over and if following the bible she should have been stoned to death.

what do you call this ugly post about others, love.?
so much hate you brought up she should be stoned to death. and all OVER WHAT? A freaking PEICE OF PAPER

If she followed the claims from her bible and church, that is what the bible calls for. Point is we no long live by the letter of the bible and its archaic laws any more and she should not have used her faith and bible to refuse to do her job as a clerk for the state.
Religious laws do not over ride state or federal law.

Since she was not without sin, she should not have been casting stones at gays for wanting a license.

so it's ok for all of you to cast stones at her. I mean people went and brought out how many time she's been married, cheered when she got put in jail for what exactly and with NO BOND? MUREDERS have a bond set yet you all don't give a crap. and it's for not signing a piece of paper when there were 100 other place that could do it for them, but they WOULDN'T afford her that because it's all about them AND everyone else be damned and go to hell too. this whole thing was sickening and all because she wouldn't sign some paper. she does have rights the same as the nasty women who caused all this. I hope this brings the states together to fight against this ruling by the Supreme court. before I really didn't care, but watching this, on top of ruining people lives and their business over a stinking cake. oh yeah, .

Licenses are issued in the local clerks office for people who live or plan to get married in area. The ceremony can be performed anywhere in the state for up to 90 in most states. Some place also require blood test. Couples must show up together and show ID.

Why should you go across the state if there is a local clerk near you? It is there job to issue licenses. It is not like they are asking her to perform the vows. Her job was to process paperwork for the state.

Her religious beliefs do not supersede the state laws for her responsibility to do her job. Not should she prevent others in the office from doing their job for the state.

For more than 2000 yrs, state laws have trumped religious laws. In the US we have a separation of church and state for that reason. People cannot impose their religion in a way that interferes with the state or other people's individual rights and beliefs.

The governor told her to do her job and she disobeyed. The courts told her to do her job and she disobeyed. If she can't or won't perform her duty to the state, she should have resigned.

Civil or religious, she was just plain wrong.

The law requires Kim's religious rights be accommodated.

'Reasonable Accommodation'

Does not mean she can not do her job.

At any time she could have excused herself, to get a coffee or water and let another clerk give the license. She has no right to prevent a couple from getting married, her job is process paperwork for the state, not impose her faith on others or throw a money wrench in the state system.

She should hanger her religion in the closet, not wave it like a matador's cape in the office

 

[DigitalDrifter]

The good Dimocrat, Kimmy Davis.

She doesn't get a pass for hateful behavior. It doesn't matter what party she registered as.

Just like her fellow elected Dims in sanctuary cities, Dims have a history of not following federal laws.

 

[WinterBorn]

If she followed the claims from her bible and church, that is what the bible calls for. Point is we no long live by the letter of the bible and its archaic laws any more and she should not have used her faith and bible to refuse to do her job as a clerk for the state.
Religious laws do not over ride state or federal law.

Since she was not without sin, she should not have been casting stones at gays for wanting a license.

so it's ok for all of you to cast stones at her. I mean people went and brought out how many time she's been married, cheered when she got put in jail for what exactly and with NO BOND? MUREDERS have a bond set yet you all don't give a crap. and it's for not signing a piece of paper when there were 100 other place that could do it for them, but they WOULDN'T afford her that because it's all about them AND everyone else be damned and go to hell too. this whole thing was sickening and all because she wouldn't sign some paper. she does have rights the same as the nasty women who caused all this. I hope this brings the states together to fight against this ruling by the Supreme court. before I really didn't care, but watching this, on top of ruining people lives and their business over a stinking cake. oh yeah, .

Licenses are issued in the local clerks office for people who live or plan to get married in area. The ceremony can be performed anywhere in the state for up to 90 in most states. Some place also require blood test. Couples must show up together and show ID.

Why should you go across the state if there is a local clerk near you? It is there job to issue licenses. It is not like they are asking her to perform the vows. Her job was to process paperwork for the state.

Her religious beliefs do not supersede the state laws for her responsibility to do her job. Not should she prevent others in the office from doing their job for the state.

For more than 2000 yrs, state laws have trumped religious laws. In the US we have a separation of church and state for that reason. People cannot impose their religion in a way that interferes with the state or other people's individual rights and beliefs.

The governor told her to do her job and she disobeyed. The courts told her to do her job and she disobeyed. If she can't or won't perform her duty to the state, she should have resigned.

Civil or religious, she was just plain wrong.

The law requires Kim's religious rights be accommodated.

no it doesn't.

Yes it does.
Do Public Employees Have Accommodation Rights Under Other Laws?

In addition to Title VII, public employees can seek religious accommodations under the First Amendment and other state laws. The First Amendment's free exercise clause may require a public employer to accommodate an employee's religious observance or practice. If the employer adversely treats religiously- motivated conduct compared to similar secular conduct, it can only justify its actions by demonstrating a narrow and compelling interest. 9 Demonstrating such an interest is much more difficult than establishing an undue burden under Title VII. For instance, a U.S. Court of Appeals invalidated a police department policy prohibiting officers from wearing beards for religious reasons, but allowing beards for medical reasons. 10

Additionally, twenty states currently have laws - either by statute or court decision - called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs), which also require the government to demonstrate a narrow and compelling interest where a religious observance or practice is substantially burdened by a law, rule or practice. 11 For the purposes of these laws, it is irrelevant whether or not the law, rule or practice is general in nature or neutral towards religion. State courts have generally not ruled on whether or not RFRAs are applicable to the public workplace. Therefore, they may be another avenue for public employees to seek religious accommodations.

The First Amendment's free speech clause may also require a public employer to accommodate an employee's religious expression. To be protected by the free speech clause, the expression must not be made pursuant to the employee's official duties. 12 Furthermore, the employee must demonstrate that his or her expression is a matter of legitimate public concern, and the employee's interest in commenting on the matter must outweigh the employer's interests in operating efficiently and effectively. 13

Do Public Employees Have Accommodation Rights Under Other Laws?

In addition to Title VII, public employees can seek religious accommodations under the First Amendment and other state laws. The First Amendment's free exercise clause may require a public employer to accommodate an employee's religious observance or practice. If the employer adversely treats religiously- motivated conduct compared to similar secular conduct, it can only justify its actions by demonstrating a narrow and compelling interest. 9 Demonstrating such an interest is much more difficult than establishing an undue burden under Title VII. For instance, a U.S. Court of Appeals invalidated a police department policy prohibiting officers from wearing beards for religious reasons, but allowing beards for medical reasons. 10

Additionally, twenty states currently have laws - either by statute or court decision - called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRAs), which also require the government to demonstrate a narrow and compelling interest where a religious observance or practice is substantially burdened by a law, rule or practice. 11 For the purposes of these laws, it is irrelevant whether or not the law, rule or practice is general in nature or neutral towards religion. State courts have generally not ruled on whether or not RFRAs are applicable to the public workplace. Therefore, they may be another avenue for public employees to seek religious accommodations.

The First Amendment's free speech clause may also require a public employer to accommodate an employee's religious expression. To be protected by the free speech clause, the expression must not be made pursuant to the employee's official duties. 12 Furthermore, the employee must demonstrate that his or her expression is a matter of legitimate public concern, and the employee's interest in commenting on the matter must outweigh the employer's interests in operating efficiently and effectively.


There is a difference between "will" or "shall" and the "may" or "can" listed in your quote.

The rest of the Bold & underlined passages show you are wrong.

 

[Lakhota]

Dildo Davis having orgasm?

 

[BULLDOG]

The good Dimocrat, Kimmy Davis.

She doesn't get a pass for hateful behavior. It doesn't matter what party she registered as.

Just like her fellow elected Dims in sanctuary cities, Dims have a history of not following federal laws.

If they are breaking federal laws, it should be easy enough to take them to court to stop them. If the right owns state government like you say, why haven't you done that?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obviously enough that tried to get a marriage license and began this whole issue with her, and their supporters.

Her and her church are wrong about gays and marriage, but they are set in their bigotry to convince themselves they are right about their hate of others.

Davis was a sinner many times over and if following the bible she should have been stoned to death.

what do you call this ugly post about others, love.?
so much hate you brought up she should be stoned to death. and all OVER WHAT? A freaking PEICE OF PAPER

If she followed the claims from her bible and church, that is what the bible calls for. Point is we no long live by the letter of the bible and its archaic laws any more and she should not have used her faith and bible to refuse to do her job as a clerk for the state.
Religious laws do not over ride state or federal law.

Since she was not without sin, she should not have been casting stones at gays for wanting a license.

so it's ok for all of you to cast stones at her. I mean people went and brought out how many time she's been married, cheered when she got put in jail for what exactly and with NO BOND? MUREDERS have a bond set yet you all don't give a crap. and it's for not signing a piece of paper when there were 100 other place that could do it for them, but they WOULDN'T afford her that because it's all about them AND everyone else be damned and go to hell too. this whole thing was sickening and all because she wouldn't sign some paper. she does have rights the same as the nasty women who caused all this. I hope this brings the states together to fight against this ruling by the Supreme court. before I really didn't care, but watching this, on top of ruining people lives and their business over a stinking cake. oh yeah, .

Licenses are issued in the local clerks office for people who live or plan to get married in area. The ceremony can be performed anywhere in the state for up to 90 in most states. Some place also require blood test. Couples must show up together and show ID.

Why should you go across the state if there is a local clerk near you? It is there job to issue licenses. It is not like they are asking her to perform the vows. Her job was to process paperwork for the state.

Her religious beliefs do not supersede the state laws for her responsibility to do her job. Not should she prevent others in the office from doing their job for the state.

For more than 2000 yrs, state laws have trumped religious laws. In the US we have a separation of church and state for that reason. People cannot impose their religion in a way that interferes with the state or other people's individual rights and beliefs.

The governor told her to do her job and she disobeyed. The courts told her to do her job and she disobeyed. If she can't or won't perform her duty to the state, she should have resigned.

Civil or religious, she was just plain wrong.

The law requires Kim's religious rights be accommodated.

She would not permit that before, bub.

No, she does, or she goes to jail again.

 

[NYcarbineer]

man, you can feel the hate they have for people coming through our computers. especially this woman who didn't bow down and kiss their ass. Getting her thrown in jail wasn't enough for you hateful and vindictive people. And she is a Democrat. You people thinking of becoming a Democrat, look how you'll be treated YOU CROSS THEM.

You the people in this country: were told what would happen once they got marriage which is suppose to be about love. That was suppose to be their final win and you thought they were going to leave you ALONE after that...... Well you see that was a Lie. now IT GET WORSE.

bow to them or get sued, fined, death threats, and them coming to the town you live to harass you and the people who lives there even though they didn't have a damn to do with these nasty women.

How long are you going take this shit from them? Time to wake up and it's NOW

Are you and the people from your trailer park going there to support her?

Don't call it a trailer park. She lives in a project.

 

[JakeStarkey]

She's in the white pages.

Very easy to find.

Leave her alone to her privacy because on Monday if she goes to work and acts stupid, she will not have any privacy for some time if ever.

She really has painted herself into a corner. On one hand, if another gay couple shows up, and she denies the license, she goes to the slammer. On the other hand, if the license is granted, then she has compromised her, so called, religious faith. Her best course is to hid in her office and pretend that she is not participating in this gay depravity while the license is issued, all the while praying that the media will go away.

No, she's not. Her name has already been removed from the licenses by her own clerks. Her complaint was that she couldn't abide her name being on the certificates if they endorsed same sex marriage.

Yet even when her clerks give her her wish, even when her name isn't on the licenses, even when she doesn't have to issue any such license, she still fights the issuance. This is a straight up Christian Fundamentalist power play, trying to use the State to force people to abide their religion conviction.

Its quite loathsome.

The next Republican president can issue an order that further indictments of clerks in Kim's position are prohibited. And there is nothing you can do about it.

Now that is Big Government Conservative Progressims, but you don't understand federalism, clearly. That EO will never be issued.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Depends on the PA laws, bub. If there are none, she is up the creek without a paddle.

 

[Statistikhengst]

man, you can feel the hate they have for people coming through our computers. especially this woman who didn't bow down and kiss their ass. Getting her thrown in jail wasn't enough for you hateful and vindictive people. And she is a Democrat. You people thinking of becoming a Democrat, look how you'll be treated YOU CROSS THEM.

You the people in this country: were told what would happen once they got marriage which is suppose to be about love. That was suppose to be their final win and you thought they were going to leave you ALONE after that...... Well you see that was a Lie. now IT GET WORSE.

bow to them or get sued, fined, death threats, and them coming to the town you live to harass you and the people who lives there even though they didn't have a damn to do with these nasty women.

How long are you going take this shit from them? Time to wake up and it's NOW

Are you and the people from your trailer park going there to support her?

Don't call it a trailer park. She lives in a project.

Lol...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

 

[Mac1958]

All the (predictable) nasty personal insults aside from the standard (predictable) people, Davis and her supporters/peers aren't going to be deterred by a billboard.

It sure would be nice to find some workable middle ground here, and all that this stuff is doing is strengthening the resolve of those who feel "persecuted".

When you're a public official and you choose to affect others with your religious beliefs, you're probably picking the wrong fight.
.

 

[Skylar]

All the (predictable) nasty personal insults aside from the standard (predictable) people, Davis and her supporters/peers aren't going to be deterred by a billboard.

It sure would be nice to find some workable middle ground here, and all that this stuff is doing is strengthening the resolve of those who feel "persecuted".

There's plenty of middle ground. She insisted she didn't want to issue the licenses. Her clerks offered to issue them in her stead.

She refused.

She insisted that she couldn't abide the certificates being issued with her name. They removed her name.

She still refuses.

Folks have bent over backward to accomidate Kim Davis. She doesn't want to be accomidated. She wants to impose her religion on gays and lesbians.....no matter what.

 

[Mac1958]

All the (predictable) nasty personal insults aside from the standard (predictable) people, Davis and her supporters/peers aren't going to be deterred by a billboard.

It sure would be nice to find some workable middle ground here, and all that this stuff is doing is strengthening the resolve of those who feel "persecuted".

There's plenty of middle ground. She insisted she didn't want to issue the licenses. Her clerks offered to issue them in her stead.

She refused.

She insisted that she couldn't abide the certificates being issued with her name. They removed her name.

She still refuses.

Folks have bent over backward to accomidate Kim Davis. She doesn't want to be accomidated. She wants to impose her religion on gays and lesbians.....no matter what.

I agree, she went too far here. This isn't a bakery.
.

 

[aris2chat]

man, you can feel the hate they have for people coming through our computers. especially this woman who didn't bow down and kiss their ass. Getting her thrown in jail wasn't enough for you hateful and vindictive people. And she is a Democrat. You people thinking of becoming a Democrat, look how you'll be treated YOU CROSS THEM.

You the people in this country: were told what would happen once they got marriage which is suppose to be about love. That was suppose to be their final win and you thought they were going to leave you ALONE after that...... Well you see that was a Lie. now IT GET WORSE.

bow to them or get sued, fined, death threats, and them coming to the town you live to harass you and the people who lives there even though they didn't have a damn to do with these nasty women.

How long are you going take this shit from them? Time to wake up and it's NOW

Are you and the people from your trailer park going there to support her?

Don't call it a trailer park. She lives in a project.

They live on a 34 acre farm northeast of Morehead

 

[bodecea]

This dope is going to go the way of Anita Bryant, whom half the people that just read that name don't have a clue who she was.

And that is the point.

Anita Bryant? Wow, I haven't heard the orange juice queen's name mentioned in many years. Yep, she was a bigot.

She actually apologized..and woke up to the realization she was being used by her husband and other rightwing groups.

 

[bodecea]

How easy is it to find the perverts that wanted the licenses?

Yep, two can play at this kind of game. I hope they do.

Yep....that would be great. Let the RW "christians" show what they are really made of.

 

[NYcarbineer]

man, you can feel the hate they have for people coming through our computers. especially this woman who didn't bow down and kiss their ass. Getting her thrown in jail wasn't enough for you hateful and vindictive people. And she is a Democrat. You people thinking of becoming a Democrat, look how you'll be treated YOU CROSS THEM.

You the people in this country: were told what would happen once they got marriage which is suppose to be about love. That was suppose to be their final win and you thought they were going to leave you ALONE after that...... Well you see that was a Lie. now IT GET WORSE.

bow to them or get sued, fined, death threats, and them coming to the town you live to harass you and the people who lives there even though they didn't have a damn to do with these nasty women.

How long are you going take this shit from them? Time to wake up and it's NOW

Are you and the people from your trailer park going there to support her?

Don't call it a trailer park. She lives in a project.

They live on a 34 acre farm northeast of Morehead

Just for the record I was referring to the poster not Ms. Davis.