Koch Bothers: Callous and Indifferent While Pursuing Profit and Power.

[dnsmith35]

Just because they have a lot of money doesn't make them gods that are always right and good.

I agree, but I also believe they have the right to spend their money as they wish, including influencing political issues. You and I both have that same right. Its called "free speech" as defined by the 1st amendment.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You didn't answer either question. You're a waste of bandwidth.

Question? You mean DOGMA. That's all you ever have.

Tell us again how jumping into a river to save a drowning child you don't even know is a "purely selfish" act? I love that one.

It's consistent with valuing children and life in general. It's selfish to be true to one's values.

And the same for a dog, am I expecting a used squeaky toy as a reward?

There is nothing "purely selfish" about jumping in to save another human being you don't know. That is a Randian rationalization and entirely without merit. Just because she was paranoid of altruism doesn't mean you have to have the moral reasoning of a newt.

 

[bripat9643]

How are they "plundering" America? Their companies produce $billions in products that Americans want, and they provide about 60,000 high paying jobs to Americans.

Just so we understand your definition of the term, could you provide an example of a corporation that isn't "plundering" America?

Bripat thinks that Capitalists are just warm fuzzy bunnies who want to visit your garden, and plant carrots for you because they are just that close to Godliness.

They would never, ever, eat of your garden and you are a terrible mean awful person for ever criticizing a warm fuzzy bunny.

Bripat and his ilk really need to get over their inferiority complex in face of people that have more money than them.

Just because they have a lot of money doesn't make them gods that are always right and good.

"Inferiority complex?" I'm not the one who hates them and wants to destroy them. We hate what we fear. That's why you hate the Kochs. On the other hand, I believe they are a couple of normal guys who happen to have a lot of money, and therefor they get to have an impact on the course of events in this country.

 

[bripat9643]

Question? You mean DOGMA. That's all you ever have.

Tell us again how jumping into a river to save a drowning child you don't even know is a "purely selfish" act? I love that one.

It's consistent with valuing children and life in general. It's selfish to be true to one's values.

And the same for a dog, am I expecting a used squeaky toy as a reward?

There is nothing "purely selfish" about jumping in to save another human being you don't know. That is a Randian rationalization and entirely without merit. Just because she was paranoid of altruism doesn't mean you have to have the moral reasoning of a newt.

Sure there is. That assumes, of course that the danger to yourself is low. It wold take an incredible lack of empathy and humanity for anyone to watch a child die when saving him posed no risk to yourself. We know you could live with yourself, but most of us couldn't.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Koch brothers donate 100 million dollars to a hospital. The left protests until the hospital declines the donation. The left complains that the Koch brothers don't help others.

See how that works? It's about perfect.

What they do is buy Good Will. See how that works?

Do you have a problem with buying good will? Or contributing millions to back your own personal political preferences? If so, why would you consider limiting the Koch brothers?

Yes, I have a problem "buying" good will. It's dishonest for one thing. What do you think Jesus meant when he taught don't let your left hand know what your right hand is doing? With the Kochs not only know, they send out a press release.

 

[boedicca]

It's consistent with valuing children and life in general. It's selfish to be true to one's values.

And the same for a dog, am I expecting a used squeaky toy as a reward?

There is nothing "purely selfish" about jumping in to save another human being you don't know. That is a Randian rationalization and entirely without merit. Just because she was paranoid of altruism doesn't mean you have to have the moral reasoning of a newt.

Sure there is. That assumes, of course that the danger to yourself is low. It wold take an incredible lack of empathy and humanity for anyone to watch a child die when saving him posed no risk to yourself. We know you could live with yourself, but most of us couldn't.

PMH is just revealing his own self-absorbed hateful nature.

It's clear he's just sit and watch the child drown.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It's consistent with valuing children and life in general. It's selfish to be true to one's values.

And the same for a dog, am I expecting a used squeaky toy as a reward?

There is nothing "purely selfish" about jumping in to save another human being you don't know. That is a Randian rationalization and entirely without merit. Just because she was paranoid of altruism doesn't mean you have to have the moral reasoning of a newt.

Sure there is. That assumes, of course that the danger to yourself is low. It wold take an incredible lack of empathy and humanity for anyone to watch a child die when saving him posed no risk to yourself. We know you could live with yourself, but most of us couldn't.

Actually I couldn't, I've lived my life and they haven't, but I'm quite sure you could. And for most people the danger doesn't even occur to them. It's in they go. That's anything but selfish.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And the same for a dog, am I expecting a used squeaky toy as a reward?

There is nothing "purely selfish" about jumping in to save another human being you don't know. That is a Randian rationalization and entirely without merit. Just because she was paranoid of altruism doesn't mean you have to have the moral reasoning of a newt.

Sure there is. That assumes, of course that the danger to yourself is low. It wold take an incredible lack of empathy and humanity for anyone to watch a child die when saving him posed no risk to yourself. We know you could live with yourself, but most of us couldn't.

PMH is just revealing his own self-absorbed hateful nature.

It's clear he's just sit and watch the child drown.

Boy aren't you a moron.

 

[peach174]

Tax, not steal. You make it here, you keep it here, you pay us our cut for allowing both of those to happen.

That is what our problem is today. Our Federal Government was never suppose to allow anything.
We were never suppose to have Federal Taxes paid by the people to the Government.
The 16th amendment has totally perverted and corrupted our government. and slowly turned it into Socialistic nightmare that's robbing us blind and wiping out the middle class.

Liberals of today has turned our government around, where the people have to ask permission to see if we can do something.

Our Federal Government is suppose to preserve liberty, be self regulated and have checks and balances.
Both Parties just ignore our Constitution and refuse to self regulate.

You live in 1791. This is 2014. Catch up.

The Basic form of how a Government is run has nothing to do with time.
You are mixing the form of Government with bills from the legislature which is for this time.
Two very different things.
The Founder's set up our Constitution for their time as well as ours and into our future.

 

[boedicca]

Sure there is. That assumes, of course that the danger to yourself is low. It wold take an incredible lack of empathy and humanity for anyone to watch a child die when saving him posed no risk to yourself. We know you could live with yourself, but most of us couldn't.

PMH is just revealing his own self-absorbed hateful nature.

It's clear he's just sit and watch the child drown.

Boy aren't you a moron.

There you go again with your projecting. You should see a doctor about that. Remember, ObamaCare is there for you!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

That is what our problem is today. Our Federal Government was never suppose to allow anything.
We were never suppose to have Federal Taxes paid by the people to the Government.
The 16th amendment has totally perverted and corrupted our government. and slowly turned it into Socialistic nightmare that's robbing us blind and wiping out the middle class.

Liberals of today has turned our government around, where the people have to ask permission to see if we can do something.

Our Federal Government is suppose to preserve liberty, be self regulated and have checks and balances.
Both Parties just ignore our Constitution and refuse to self regulate.

You live in 1791. This is 2014. Catch up.

The Basic form of how a Government is run has nothing to do with time.
You are mixing the form of Government with bills from the legislature which is for this time.
Two very different things.
The Founder's set up our Constitution for their time as well as ours and into our future.

No, it was for their time, and they expected us to do the same. Look it up and you'll find that I am correct.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

PMH is just revealing his own self-absorbed hateful nature.

It's clear he's just sit and watch the child drown.

Boy aren't you a moron.

There you go again with your projecting. You should see a doctor about that. Remember, ObamaCare is there for you!

Yes it is but I don't need a shrink, you need a working brain.

 

[boedicca]

I am rubber
You are glue
Nasty things you say
Bounce off of me
And stick to you

 

[peach174]

You live in 1791. This is 2014. Catch up.

The Basic form of how a Government is run has nothing to do with time.
You are mixing the form of Government with bills from the legislature which is for this time.
Two very different things.
The Founder's set up our Constitution for their time as well as ours and into our future.

No, it was for their time, and they expected us to do the same. Look it up and you'll find that I am correct.

Now we have it.
You are against God and moral laws.
Without these two, you then have to have a Government that controls the people.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Basic form of how a Government is run has nothing to do with time.
You are mixing the form of Government with bills from the legislature which is for this time.
Two very different things.
The Founder's set up our Constitution for their time as well as ours and into our future.

No, it was for their time, and they expected us to do the same. Look it up and you'll find that I am correct.

Now we have it.
You are against God and moral laws.
Without these two, you then have to have a Government that controls the people.

Your god and they Constitution have one thing in common, they were both invented by men.

 

[boedicca]

PMH wasn't invented by men.

Somebody found him by lifting up a rock.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I am rubber
You are glue
Nasty things you say
Bounce off of me
And stick to you

Terrific, are you going to call for the playground lady next, or just run and wet your pants?

 

[boedicca]

I am rubber
You are glue
Nasty things you say
Bounce off of me
And stick to you

Terrific, are you going to call for the playground lady next, or just run and wet your pants?

Finally! I found a level of communication you understand.

Now go eat a stinkerburger, poopyhead.

 

[Howey]

Edit: I guess Westwall deleted his post about Soros being a Nazi sympathizer. Too late! I saw it!

Good Lord...you're proof positive that even mods can be fucking retards!


Beck falsely accuses Soros of Nazi collaboration on Kristallnacht anniversary | Blog | Media Matters for America

Toronto Sun corrects Soros-Nazi smear | Research | Media Matters for America

On September 5, 2010, a column by Ezra Levant contained false statements about George Soros and his conduct as a young teenager in Nazi-occupied Hungary.

Upon receiving a letter of complaint from Mr. Soros's legal counsel on September 13, 2010, Sun Media Corporation always intended to publish a retraction and apology for this column. Despite constant efforts on both sides, Sun Media and Mr. Soros's counsel were unable to reach agreement on the content of a retraction.

The management of Sun Media wishes to state that there is no basis for the statements in the column and they should not have been made.

Sun Media, this newspaper and Ezra Levant retract the statements made in the column and unreservedly apologize to Mr. Soros for the distress and harm this column may have caused to him.

 

[peach174]

No, it was for their time, and they expected us to do the same. Look it up and you'll find that I am correct.

Now we have it.
You are against God and moral laws.
Without these two, you then have to have a Government that controls the people.

Your god and they Constitution have one thing in common, they were both invented by men.

I think you mean their Constitution.
It is our Constitution.
You can believe that all you want to but it does not make it true.
There was a non believer who, at the time of when our Constitution was finalized, made a comment on maybe there was a God after all, based on what he witnessed.
Written by him in a letter later, that is in our Library of Congress.