Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Certainly I'll be happy to give you a lesson in 'context.'
"Most economists were dismissive, but by 2008, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote that peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Have Concerns Over Peak Oil Peaked - Collide-a-Scape
Sorry to have made you look so stupid.
Certainly I'll be happy to give you a lesson in 'context.'
"Most economists were dismissive, but by 2008, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote that peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Have Concerns Over Peak Oil Peaked - Collide-a-Scape
Sorry to have made you look so stupid.
It would appear you still haven't found the time to check the quote? What Krugman actually wrote in December 2010 was that (paraphrasing), oil output hasn't changed at all during the last years, and "in that sense, at least, peak oil has arrived".
So, that's a lesson in context. No need to thank me.
You may now resume the re-bleating.
Certainly I'll be happy to give you a lesson in 'context.'
"Most economists were dismissive, but by 2008, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote that peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Have Concerns Over Peak Oil Peaked - Collide-a-Scape
Sorry to have made you look so stupid.
It would appear you still haven't found the time to check the quote? What Krugman actually wrote in December 2010 was that (paraphrasing), oil output hasn't changed at all during the last years, and "in that sense, at least, peak oil has arrived".
So, that's a lesson in context. No need to thank me.
You may now resume the re-bleating.
"What Krugman actually wrote in December 2010 was that"...
"...peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Certainly I'll be happy to give you a lesson in 'context.'
"Most economists were dismissive, but by 2008, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote that peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Have Concerns Over Peak Oil Peaked - Collide-a-Scape
Sorry to have made you look so stupid.
It would appear you still haven't found the time to check the quote? What Krugman actually wrote in December 2010 was that (paraphrasing), oil output hasn't changed at all during the last years, and "in that sense, at least, peak oil has arrived".
So, that's a lesson in context. No need to thank me.
You may now resume the re-bleating.
"What Krugman actually wrote in December 2010 was that"...
"...peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Yeah. The former was taken from a discussion as to the conditions under which hard to extract, and costly to produce oil resources might hit the markets, and the impact that would be having on the inevitable arrival of "peak oil", whereas the latter was from a discussion of what it meant to live in a world of finite resources, stating that for the time being (2010) oil production has peaked for a number of years.
Of course, that's a little more complex than the simplicity your handlers feed you, and about which you prefer to hyperventilate.
Krugman is an outstanding economist, and a clear-eyed commentator on U.S. politics and policies who consistently puts flat-earthers and their crackpot "theories" to shame, and so it isn't that hard to understand that he'll draw a lot of flack from these quarters. The U.S. of A. is better off for him, and for fact-based humiliations he's regularly inflicting on the flat-earthers in particular.
"What Krugman actually wrote in December 2010 was that"...
"...peak oil was “a dismal theory that keeps getting more plausible.” Two years later, he declared that “peak oil has arrived.”
Yeah. The former was taken from a discussion as to the conditions under which hard to extract, and costly to produce oil resources might hit the markets, and the impact that would be having on the inevitable arrival of "peak oil", whereas the latter was from a discussion of what it meant to live in a world of finite resources, stating that for the time being (2010) oil production has peaked for a number of years.
Of course, that's a little more complex than the simplicity your handlers feed you, and about which you prefer to hyperventilate.
Krugman is an outstanding economist, and a clear-eyed commentator on U.S. politics and policies who consistently puts flat-earthers and their crackpot "theories" to shame, and so it isn't that hard to understand that he'll draw a lot of flack from these quarters. The U.S. of A. is better off for him, and for fact-based humiliations he's regularly inflicting on the flat-earthers in particular.
Another rant from PoliChic -- everybody stand back, she's gonna blow!!
No, it wasn't. Nobody forced Germany to become militaristic again. In fact, at the first sign of it, we should have crushed them quickly.
No one cares about your personal story, Job. The overall consensus is that the VA is awful
And does anyone seriously listen to Krugman anymore?.
No, it wasn't. Nobody forced Germany to become militaristic again. In fact, at the first sign of it, we should have crushed them quickly.
Wow, dude, there was a reason why they didn't. Mostly, it was because the wealthy who wanted the first war were more afraid of their own workers than the "Enemy" after revolutions toppled the Tsar and the Kaisers.
Oil is a non-renewable resource which means its continued use will deplete it.
If you want to argue about the timeframe, fine. But its eventual depletion is an irrefutable fact.
No, it wasn't. Nobody forced Germany to become militaristic again. In fact, at the first sign of it, we should have crushed them quickly.
Wow, dude, there was a reason why they didn't. Mostly, it was because the wealthy who wanted the first war were more afraid of their own workers than the "Enemy" after revolutions toppled the Tsar and the Kaisers.
Oh, do tell! Who was it who wanted Germany to invade their countries the first time around?
Oil is an abiotic resource we'll never run out of because the inner earth continues to produce it. This is evidenced by wells thought to be depleted begin producing again. So the "peak oil" scam is not only wrong, it's a criminal attempt to keep price-fixing it. And of course "BIG OIL" is going along with this caper so you'll think oil is a dwindling commodity when in fact, we've barely scratched the surface of the SEA of OIL under us.
Oil is an abiotic resource we'll never run out of because the inner earth continues to produce it. This is evidenced by wells thought to be depleted begin producing again. So the "peak oil" scam is not only wrong, it's a criminal attempt to keep price-fixing it. And of course "BIG OIL" is going along with this caper so you'll think oil is a dwindling commodity when in fact, we've barely scratched the surface of the SEA of OIL under us.
Dumbass, the inner earth can't produce oil as fast as we are depleting it.
Oil is an abiotic resource we'll never run out of because the inner earth continues to produce it. This is evidenced by wells thought to be depleted begin producing again. So the "peak oil" scam is not only wrong, it's a criminal attempt to keep price-fixing it. And of course "BIG OIL" is going along with this caper so you'll think oil is a dwindling commodity when in fact, we've barely scratched the surface of the SEA of OIL under us.
Dumbass, the inner earth can't produce oil as fast as we are depleting it.
Sissy boy we have plenty.
Oil is an abiotic resource we'll never run out of because the inner earth continues to produce it. This is evidenced by wells thought to be depleted begin producing again. So the "peak oil" scam is not only wrong, it's a criminal attempt to keep price-fixing it. And of course "BIG OIL" is going along with this caper so you'll think oil is a dwindling commodity when in fact, we've barely scratched the surface of the SEA of OIL under us.
Dumbass, the inner earth can't produce oil as fast as we are depleting it.
Sissy boy we have plenty.
No, we don't. Certainly not if China and India start using petroleum at the rate that the west uses it. Even the oil industry admits the world only has 53 years of petroleum left.
Oil is a non-renewable resource which means its continued use will deplete it.
If you want to argue about the timeframe, fine. But its eventual depletion is an irrefutable fact.
Oil is an abiotic resource we'll never run out of because the inner earth continues to produce it. This is evidenced by wells thought to be depleted begin producing again. So the "peak oil" scam is not only wrong, it's a criminal attempt to keep price-fixing it. And of course "BIG OIL" is going along with this caper so you'll think oil is a dwindling commodity when in fact, we've barely scratched the surface of the SEA of OIL under us.
