Ghost of a Rider
Gold Member
Sure it is. You apparently think that her behavior was normal.
I never said a word one way or the other about her behavior because - as I’ve told you twice now - her behavior is irrelevant because she never shot anyone.
I think it was the kind that would produce a mass shooter.
Bullshit.
1.) None of the other mass shooters’ parents had a stockpile of weapons.
2.) There are numerous “preppers” out there whose kids never killed anyone.
Except- it produced a mass shooter, so I win!
No it didn’t.
As it should be. So should gun ownership if you aren't a soldier or a policeman.
The common denominator here is: people doing stupid or criminal shit. However, in spite of all the safety features on vehicles, more people still die in accidents than by murder.
You just made a great argument as to why private gun ownership should be banned. Good work. Oh, wait, that's probably not what you were going for.
No I didn’t you moron. I didn’t make an argument as to why private gun ownership should be banned, I made the argument that gun manufacturers should not be held responsible for legally selling firearms when most firearm murders are committed with stolen firearms. Idiot.
Right. So what do we call them, "Unwilling bullet recipients"? This judge was a dipshit who tanked the trial. From allowing the victims to be demonized to excluding evidence showing what a racist POS Shooty McFlopsweat was.
Call them whatever you want but for the purposes of trial objectivity, they were not victims. They were, in fact, the aggressors and the jury agreed.
These “victims” brought this on themselves by attacking a guy with a semi-automatic rifle. This entire scenario played out exactly as one would expect given all the factors: An armed guy is chased by a mob and attacked for nothing more than putting out a fire and the attacker attempts to take his weapon from him. Any person in the same situation would think this person might mean to take my weapon and use it on me. So he fires to defend himself.
Another mob - not understanding the circumstances of the shooting - attempt to subdue him with some calling for his death. So he fires two more times.
Really? because I checked, there were not riots in Antioch that day. He had to get into a car and go to a riot in Kenosha.
You idiot. YOU said he went to participate in the riots. He did not.
That's like saying the jury in the Emmet Till case made the right decision. Or that the jury in the OJ SImpson case did. All that proves is that when you have inept lawyers and judges, you can have really bad results. Although often, the opposite is true... innocent people going to jail for crimes they didn't commit.
I don’t know what you expect me to say here. I watched the videos and I saw self defense. The jury saw the same video and arrived at the same conclusion. Tough shit. You don’t get your pound of conservative, gun owner flesh this time.
The video spoke for itself, a flopsweaty white boy shooting people because he got in over his head.
If anyone got in over his head it was the three guys who were shot.
He shot an unarmed man.
Who attacked him.
Then he shot his way through a crowd
Who also attacked him.
trying to hold him for the police.
Bullshit. They meant to beat his ass and the video shows them trying to do just that.
Rosenbaum was homeless living on the streets of Kenosha. Grosskreutz resided in West Allis, which is a suburb of Milwaukee...
Your point?
He went there to help people as a paramedic. Shooty McFlopsweat went there to shoot people.
A lie.
He even said as much on video before he did it.
Another lie.
![]()
Prosecutors Want to Use Video of Kyle Rittenhouse Allegedly Expressing Desire to Shoot a Black Man with His 'AR'
"Quite simply, the defendant saw something, jumped to a conclusion based on exactly zero facts, and then threatened to kill someone," prosecutors argued.lawandcrime.com
“Bro, I wish I had my fucking AR,” the 17-year-old allegedly says on a video some 15 days before the fatal incidents that occurred during a Black Lives Matter protest. “I’d start shooting rounds at them.”
In the footage, Rittenhouse and others who appear to be inside a car are referencing a Black man seen jogging out of and away from a CVS Pharmacy. According to prosecutors, Rittenhouse expressed his desire to shoot at “several” such individuals at the drugstore because he believed they were stealing.
Yeah, Jury didn't get to hear about that, either. Puts the thing is a whole new light, doesn't it?
Not for me it doesn’t. It has no bearing on the shooting because he never shot anyone until he was attacked.
Opinions that aren't yours aren't lies, buddy. Sorry you don't get that.
Fuck that, you lie repeatedly and you just lied two more times in your last post.
This is not an accusation made after the fact. I told you then that you lied and I corrected you when you were wrong about some detail and you always proceeded to argue based on these lies and incorrect information.
You’ve never given a shit about facts because facts get in the way of your narrative.
Last edited: