Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
Unhinged lunatic with a plastic bag?The odds are Rosenbaum would have beaten him to death. Rosenbaum was acting like an unhinged lunatic at the time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unhinged lunatic with a plastic bag?The odds are Rosenbaum would have beaten him to death. Rosenbaum was acting like an unhinged lunatic at the time.
No he wasn't.Rittenhouse was!
Still stuck on that bag, are you?Unhinged lunatic with a plastic bag?
Post 1.It was not a protest it was a mindless riot.
by your idiotic logic the DC police initiated the Jan 6 riot by being armed
Post 2.No it is not
It is historic fact you brainless twit
Post 3.Yes it is
Post 4.It is a threat to the man holding the gun you moron
Post 5.he absolutely was threatened with deadly force]
You are a bald facewd LIAR
The viudeo and all evidence clearly proves ths fact
Post 6. I'm sorry, did you say something?No it is fact proven by video
Post 6. I'm sorry, did you say something?
Rittenhouse was attacked with a skateboard and a plastic bag. Neither are deadly weapons. Rittenhouse, on the otherhand, brought a deadly weapon to a protest that was none of his business! He brought that weapon to shoot somebody! Those murders were premeditated.You have absolutely no proof of that.
Me as Kyles lawyer
Your honor "projection and speculation", so please strike this from the record.
Judge - sustained, and with a stern warning to prosecutor Billy Boy, otherwise that will basically instruct him to be careful because the case is about to be thrown out due to such sleazy tactics that are being shown by him.
He brought a rifle to a protest! This isn't the old west!No he wasn't.
On what do you base this claim?
Question for you Billo, and this is not a gotcha. If, instead of the rifle, Rittenhouse had a concealed pistol and managed to draw it and shoot the first attacker just as before, and all the facts were other wise the same, would you find Rittenhouse guilty criminally, or inversely more civilly liable?Unhinged lunatic with a plastic bag?
As well as someone WITH A RIFLE!Still stuck on that bag, are you?
If you don't know that one can seriously injure and even kill someone with just their fists and feet, you're an idiot.
My issue with Rittenhouse is that he introduced deadly force. It doesn't matter whether it is a rifle, or a hand gun, it's still deadly force.Question for you Billo, and this is not a gotcha. If, instead of the rifle, Rittenhouse had a concealed pistol and managed to draw it and shoot the first attacker just as before, and all the facts were other wise the same, would you find Rittenhouse guilty criminally, or inversely more civilly liable?
Interesting. One does have a right to self defense yes? especially given that multiple attackers or persons nearby were armed. Without being armed he might have been Reginald Denny'd by his attackers at least.My issue with Rittenhouse is that he introduced deadly force. It doesn't matter whether it is a rifle, or a hand gun, it's still deadly force.
and you keep running on your hamster wheel, ignoring facts.The troll takes 6 posts to make 1 point. Jeez!
You are exactly right... They have a movement built up around some crazy shite, and because of this they are constantly in attack mode because of their guilty minds. What's worse is that the American family is being undermined from within by the weakness exampled in the garden.I've noticed that.
Thing is, if you look at this at the basic human psychological level, to most of the people here who vilify Rittenhouse, his actions on that day are not really the problem. The issue for them is that, to them, Rittenhouse embodies or represents a subculture that they hate.
Common sense. Yes.Interesting. One does have a right to self defense yes? especially given that multiple attackers or persons nearby were armed. Without being armed he might have been Reginald Denny'd by his attackers at least.