Kyle Rittenhouse sued by estate of Joseph Rosenbaum

And what would've happen if Rittenhouse pit out the fire without the rifle? Have you ever wondered why two different groups of people would chase the same armed man? My contention is Rittenhouse initiated the violence by bringing an armed weapon to a protest.
It was not a protest it was a mindless riot.

by your idiotic logic the DC police initiated the Jan 6 riot by being armed
 
Everyone has a right to defend themselves; but you can only respond with deadly force if you, yourself, is being threatened with deadly force. Rittenhouse was not!
he absolutely was threatened with deadly force]

You are a bald facewd LIAR
The viudeo and all evidence clearly proves ths fact
 
Rosenbaum who sexually abused 5 kids and had just been released from jail/psych ward and who was shot because he was chasing Kyle intent to do him harm

Kyle did society a favor

Rittenhouse did know that before he broke curfew and killed the man.
 
No it is fact proven by video

Rittenhouse was playing out a fantasy as a vigilante. What gave him any right to break the curfew?

The protesters had gone home by dusk for 3 nights. Nobody was left except vandals, arsonists and militia crackpots like Oath Keepers, Boogaloo Bois and Proud Boys.
 
Everyone has a right to defend themselves; but you can only respond with deadly force if you, yourself, is being threatened with deadly force. Rittenhouse was not!
You have absolutely no proof of that.

Me as Kyles lawyer

Your honor "projection and speculation", so please strike this from the record.

Judge - sustained, and with a stern warning to prosecutor Billy Boy, otherwise that will basically instruct him to be careful because the case is about to be thrown out due to such sleazy tactics that are being shown by him.
 
Rittenhouse was playing out a fantasy as a vigilante. What gave him any right to break the curfew?

What gave Rosenbaum, Huber, Grosskreutz and everybody else the right to break curfew?
The protesters had gone home by dusk for 3 nights. Nobody was left except vandals, arsonists and militia crackpots like Oath Keepers, Boogaloo Bois and Proud Boys.
If you're going to make an issue of the curfew in Kyle's case then what difference does it make who the other curfew breakers were?
 
What gave Rosenbaum, Huber, Grosskreutz and everybody else the right to break curfew?

If you're going to make an issue of the curfew in Kyle's case then what difference does it make who the other curfew breakers were?
They'll try anything... Fact
 
Rittenhouse was playing out a fantasy as a vigilante. What gave him any right to break the curfew?

The protesters had gone home by dusk for 3 nights. Nobody was left except vandals, arsonists and militia crackpots like Oath Keepers, Boogaloo Bois and Proud Boys.
Wrong.

There were no protestors. It was a mindless riot from satrt to finish

Curfew or no curfew they had no right to attack him and what he did was self defense. The curfew crap is strictly a meaningless distraction from the absolute proven fact that he acted in self defense.
 
Wrong.

There were no protestors. It was a mindless riot from satrt to finish

Curfew or no curfew they had no right to attack him and what he did was self defense. The curfew crap is strictly a meaningless distraction from the absolute proven fact that he acted in self defense.
You have to remember, this is a civil case based on negligence. Plaintiff has to show the Rittenhouse was more liable. If plaintiff can show Rittenhouse was negligent in being there, it helps support their case.
 
They'll try anything... Fact
I've noticed that.

Thing is, if you look at this at the basic human psychological level, to most of the people here who vilify Rittenhouse, his actions on that day are not really the problem. The issue for them is that, to them, Rittenhouse embodies or represents a subculture that they hate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top