AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
I could easily kill you with one. There are several methods; one of which would be to stuff it into your annoying mouth and hold your nose.You can't kill someone with a plastic bag!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I could easily kill you with one. There are several methods; one of which would be to stuff it into your annoying mouth and hold your nose.You can't kill someone with a plastic bag!
The odds are Rosenbaum would have beaten him to death. Rosenbaum was acting like an unhinged lunatic at the time.I am just asking the question what would've happened if Rittenhouse didn't bring the rifle in the first place?
It was not a protest it was a mindless riot.And what would've happen if Rittenhouse pit out the fire without the rifle? Have you ever wondered why two different groups of people would chase the same armed man? My contention is Rittenhouse initiated the violence by bringing an armed weapon to a protest.
No it is notThat's a bunch of bullshit!
Yes it isYou fuckers think it is okay to carry a firearm whereever you go? Well, it is not okay! And fuck you for thinking that!
It is a threat to the man holding the gun you moronReaching for a gun is not as dangerous as the man with the gun!
he absolutely was threatened with deadly force]Everyone has a right to defend themselves; but you can only respond with deadly force if you, yourself, is being threatened with deadly force. Rittenhouse was not!
No it is fact proven by videoThat's nonsense!
Rosenbaum who sexually abused 5 kids and had just been released from jail/psych ward and who was shot because he was chasing Kyle intent to do him harm
Kyle did society a favor
No it is fact proven by video
It is a threat to the man holding the gun you moron
You have absolutely no proof of that.Everyone has a right to defend themselves; but you can only respond with deadly force if you, yourself, is being threatened with deadly force. Rittenhouse was not!
Oh the one that was being ignored by everybody ? Tell us oh wise one.Why do you think there was a curfew in Kenosha?
Rittenhouse was playing out a fantasy as a vigilante. What gave him any right to break the curfew?
If you're going to make an issue of the curfew in Kyle's case then what difference does it make who the other curfew breakers were?The protesters had gone home by dusk for 3 nights. Nobody was left except vandals, arsonists and militia crackpots like Oath Keepers, Boogaloo Bois and Proud Boys.
They'll try anything... FactWhat gave Rosenbaum, Huber, Grosskreutz and everybody else the right to break curfew?
If you're going to make an issue of the curfew in Kyle's case then what difference does it make who the other curfew breakers were?
Wrong.Rittenhouse was playing out a fantasy as a vigilante. What gave him any right to break the curfew?
The protesters had gone home by dusk for 3 nights. Nobody was left except vandals, arsonists and militia crackpots like Oath Keepers, Boogaloo Bois and Proud Boys.
You have to remember, this is a civil case based on negligence. Plaintiff has to show the Rittenhouse was more liable. If plaintiff can show Rittenhouse was negligent in being there, it helps support their case.Wrong.
There were no protestors. It was a mindless riot from satrt to finish
Curfew or no curfew they had no right to attack him and what he did was self defense. The curfew crap is strictly a meaningless distraction from the absolute proven fact that he acted in self defense.
I've noticed that.They'll try anything... Fact
Rittenhouse was!and you act like everyone that owns a firearm, and carries for self protection, is out to murder someone.
Do you carry a parasol, so your shadow doesn't scare you to death?
I stand corrected.I could easily kill you with one. There are several methods; one of which would be to stuff it into your annoying mouth and hold your nose.