Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Same reply as last time. Have you been living under a rock.Which cities did they burn?
Same reply as last time. Have you been living under a rock.
I'll add.........are you under that statue that pissed you off so bad that you knocked it down and it fell on you.
poor thing.
He killed two criminals and wounded a third. All three attacked him and the "stupid kid" has every right to be where he wants to be.No he wasn't defending anyone's property.. They turned him down. He was a stupid kid with a gun who traveled to another state to play vigilante.. He killed two people and crippled a third.
Yeah, which city burned down?Same reply as last time. Have you been living under a rock.
I'll add.........are you under that statue that pissed you off so bad that you knocked it down and it fell on you.
poor thing.
Take your racist crap to parler.He killed two criminals and wounded a third. All three attacked him and the "stupid kid" has every right to be where he wants to be.
I am alarmed at this attitude that people can't go where they want in fear of annoying criminals.....that is some twisted way of thinking. There was a time that we held such "dumb kids" up as heros and gave them a medal for acting to protect society from the criminals who were attacking. It's bizarre that you think everyone should just back down to the criminals. It's wrong and dangerous thinking. I am afraid that things have gotten so bad, that it will only be by vigilante justice that criminals are beaten back down if ever. The WILD WEST and NY 1970's was civilized not by nitwits saying that society should back down to the criminals...quite the opposite--it was shooting and beating the snot out of the criminals that finally made a difference. Any less than this---and the criminals, gangs, and corrupt pols will destroy america as we know it.
Actually anyone is---who has any sort of knowledge or even a willingness and can remain calm under pressure can be---of help. Bleeding--apply pressure change body position. Blocked airway--unblock and breathe or arrange breathing...Diabetic depending which way they are going--you have options. Dehydrated and most bleeding---give fluids. Hyperthermia--water and cool off------Hypo--warm them up. Shock change body position and water. When in doubt call 911---they will walk you through it and send help. Baby being born, oh yeah, there are things you can do to help...same goes with heart attacks and strokes. Got a smart phone---google is at your finger tips with all sorts of information as is 911.He had EMT training, so yes he was.
You know self defense law...........
When the other guy breaks contact......if you then pursue that guy and initiate more violence you are no longer innocent and defending yourself, you have become the bad guy...
Rittenhouse never initiated any violence.......all three of the other guys initiated violence against Rittenhouse who in all 3 attacks was moving away from them....they are the bad guys no matter if Rittenhouse made a bad decision in being there...
He was a 17 yr old high school drop out.
nypost.com
He provoked the criminals to attack by what? Being there? The kid had every right to be there, had ever right to defend the property and city, had every right to walk down the street. Under you defination, a woman walking down the street and attacked by a rapist, or a kid walking down the street given the killed Pedo's background, are asking for trouble for daring to be out where they could be seen.Take your racist crap to parler.
Under all laws, you can't provoke a confrontation then claim self defense if you get attacked.
Rittenhouse had a right to defend the city and the business...he had the right to be where he wanted. The criminals attacked him and were solely at fault. We don't need a nation of pussies who hide in corners from the bad guys---I think you don't understand what my position is here.
Yes I know self-defense laws. When I was younger I was trained to a black belt where at that point, I knew five ways to kill a man in four moves or less.
I took our CCW course, passed the test and range.
I know self-defense, and what I was taught in self-defense is that if you enter a violent situation which this was, anything after that point is your fault. You use self-defense when you are attacked through no fault of your own.
So to me it doesn't matter if Rittenhouse was attacked, if he attacked somebody else, names called, why he was there is all irrelevant to me. What my issue is that he went there to start trouble. After that, he's responsible for any trouble he caused especially murder.
The families of the criminals have no bearing and are not out---their criminal family attacked a kid, and got shot in self defense. If they want justice---they need to take it up with their criminal family member. Justice was served was they were shot- Rittenhouse should be able to sue the criminals estate for pain caused him.
Rittenhouse had a right to defend the city and the business...he had the right to be where he wanted. The criminals attacked him and were solely at fault. We don't need a nation of pussies who hide in corners from the bad guys---
So if one of your kids turns out to go the wrong way in life and ends up killed, you deserve no satisfaction for the person(s) that killed him?
It's a political trial where one side of politics renders unequal justice based on party affilliation.
Rittenhouse had a right to defend the city and the business...he had the right to be where he wanted. The criminals attacked him and were solely at fault. We don't need a nation of pussies who hide in corners from the bad guys---
nypost.com
He did not have the right to defend the city and businesses unless he was a police officer for that city. For crying out loud he didn't even live in the state. When did vigilantism become legal in this country?
My state adopted the Stand Your Ground law, but prior to that, if somebody was screaming at me and I didn't turn around and get away from him, but used my gun instead, I would end up in jail for murder. Why? Because in our state you had a duty to retreat. You must (by law) remove yourself from any potential violent situation. Now, STG changed that, but if I seen some gang members in front of my house getting ready to brawl, and I went out there with my gun where several of them tried to attack me and I killed them, that's not self-defense. Why? Because I left my place of safety and deliberately inserted myself into a violent situation that had zero to do with me.
Do you have me on iggy or something?
It wasn't murder, it was self defense......you pretend that the violent attacks on Rittenhouse played no part in what happened.
gun illegally obtained.Rittenhouse had a right to defend the city and the business...he had the right to be where he wanted. The criminals attacked him and were solely at fault. We don't need a nation of pussies who hide in corners from the bad guys---
He did not have the right to defend the city and businesses unless he was a police officer for that city. For crying out loud he didn't even live in the state. When did vigilantism become legal in this country?
My state adopted the Stand Your Ground law, but prior to that, if somebody was screaming at me and I didn't turn around and get away from him, but used my gun instead, I would end up in jail for murder. Why? Because in our state you had a duty to retreat. You must (by law) remove yourself from any potential violent situation. Now, STG changed that, but if I seen some gang members in front of my house getting ready to brawl, and I went out there with my gun where several of them tried to attack me and I killed them, that's not self-defense. Why? Because I left my place of safety and deliberately inserted myself into a violent situation that had zero to do with me.
