Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I'm afraid that Obama has surrendered every advantage the United States has in an attempt to bring us down. He's attacked our economy, our sovereignty, and our oversight of critical technologies.Are you afraid that this will let countries censor and control what their people are able to view? Because they can already do that. Are you afraid this will let countries censor and control what people in other countries are able to view? Then you don't know how the internet works.
"Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on."Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on."Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
Oversight of the addresses and naming conventions necessary to access the internet and host servers, sites, etc.Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on."Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
How does it work in practice though? What specifically is the US giving up?
Yeah dude the corporate establishment NWO elitist globalists put flouride in our water and force flu shots on us to keep us docile and now the UN is going to censor the internet so marxist international corporations can consolidate their Muslim NWO WW3 ebola FEMA nukes Iran space aliens lizard people!!!"Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So thorough. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Oversight of the addresses and naming conventions necessary to access the internet and host servers, sites, etc.Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on."Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
How does it work in practice though? What specifically is the US giving up?
I heard that China's going to block the series of tubes that brings us the internet!!!Oversight of the addresses and naming conventions necessary to access the internet and host servers, sites, etc.Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on."Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
How does it work in practice though? What specifically is the US giving up?
Let me ask you something chief - what is the advantage to the U.S. in surrendering oversight of IANA?Yeah dude the corporate establishment NWO elitist globalists put flouride in our water and force flu shots on us to keep us docile and now the UN is going to censor the internet so marxist international corporations can consolidate their Muslim NWO WW3 ebola FEMA nukes Iran space aliens lizard people!!!"Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So thorough. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
Really? We don't? We didn't create the internet during the 1940's as a redundant communications network for the federal government in the event of a nuclear war? Wow...I'm so glad you progressives are here to educate the rest of us on history. Oh wait....that's right...you people ignore history. That's why you continue to make the same ignorant mistakes over and over and over.Oversight of the addresses and naming conventions necessary to access the internet and host servers, sites, etc.Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on."Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So through. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.
Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
How does it work in practice though? What specifically is the US giving up?
Oh, so not really giving up control of the internet then, since we don't own it anyway.
Are you afraid that this will let countries censor and control what their people are able to view? Because they can already do that. Are you afraid this will let countries censor and control what people in other countries are able to view? Then you don't know how the internet works.
You don't know how Soros works. He is in the process of having us use the internet as our voting booths. Sign up and vote, whoever you are. Then he will tell us who "we" elected.
As the current U.S. President and his fellow NWO Globalist Elites continue their assault on Freedom & Liberty, will the U.S. Congress stand with the People and thwart them?
Congress Can Save the Internet
President Obama wants this to be the last month of an open, uncensored internet guaranteed by the U.S. government. His plan to end American stewardship would hand new power to authoritarian governments offended by the internet as we know it.
The good news is it appears congressional leaders have agreed to rescue the internet in time to prevent the Sept. 30 expiration of U.S. oversight. Sen. Ted Cruz, who has pushed hard against the plan since it was announced two years ago, told me last week he’s “cautiously optimistic” legislators will block it through a rider to the federal budget: “The basic proposition of keeping the internet free has united Republicans across the spectrum and should also unite Democrats with Republicans.”
Top Senate and House Republicans have signaled they will ensure U.S. oversight continues to protect the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann, and its stakeholders...
Read More:
Congress Can Save the Internet
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®
Really? We don't? We didn't create the internet during the 1940's as a redundant communications network for the federal government in the event of a nuclear war? Wow...I'm so glad you progressives are here to educate the rest of us on history. Oh wait....that's right...you people ignore history. That's why you continue to make the same ignorant mistakes over and over and over.Oversight of the addresses and naming conventions necessary to access the internet and host servers, sites, etc.Only someone who was illiterate would be unable to. The OP was crystal clear, articulate, and dead-on.Really? Can you make sense of the OP?
How does it work in practice though? What specifically is the US giving up?
Oh, so not really giving up control of the internet then, since we don't own it anyway.
And we don't currently control the IP address and naming conventions? The world doesn't need to go through us for that stuff so that they can access the internet and host stuff on it? Really?
China doesn't "bring us" the internet genius.I heard that China's going to block the series of tubes that brings us the internet!!!
It was "transitioned" to the private sector decades ago sweetie. You dance around the issue because you can't defend Obama. But you're too much of a partisan hack progressive to simply acknowledge when he's wrong - even when the rest of the world knows it.Oh, the federal government certainly got it off the ground. Many new technologies began with the US government only to be incorporated and improved upon by the private sector and the internet is no different. The US always planned to transition this to the private sector. We're going to be just fine, you'll still find your porn.
Incidentally...why was 'ole Barry Soetoro so desperate for an internet "kill switch"? You know...since you're trying to turn this into some authoritarian control issue.Oh, the federal government certainly got it off the ground. Many new technologies began with the US government only to be incorporated and improved upon by the private sector and the internet is no different. The US always planned to transition this to the private sector. We're going to be just fine, you'll still find your porn.
It was "transitioned" to the private sector decades ago sweetie. You dance around the issue because you can't defend Obama. But you're too much of a partisan hack progressive to simply acknowledge when he's wrong - even when the rest of the world knows it.Oh, the federal government certainly got it off the ground. Many new technologies began with the US government only to be incorporated and improved upon by the private sector and the internet is no different. The US always planned to transition this to the private sector. We're going to be just fine, you'll still find your porn.
Let me guess - you're so stupid - you actually think that the federal government runs IANA?
Incidentally...why was 'ole Barry Soetoro so desperate for an internet "kill switch"? You know...since you're trying to turn this into some authoritarian control issue.Oh, the federal government certainly got it off the ground. Many new technologies began with the US government only to be incorporated and improved upon by the private sector and the internet is no different. The US always planned to transition this to the private sector. We're going to be just fine, you'll still find your porn.
Advantage? There was never any advantage. Congress tried to block .xxx from becoming a domain name once but it failed. Is that what you mean by advantage?Let me ask you something chief - what is the advantage to the U.S. in surrendering oversight of IANA?Yeah dude the corporate establishment NWO elitist globalists put flouride in our water and force flu shots on us to keep us docile and now the UN is going to censor the internet so marxist international corporations can consolidate their Muslim NWO WW3 ebola FEMA nukes Iran space aliens lizard people!!!"Completely gibberish". Typical progressive "argument". So intelligent. So thorough. So indisputable. God Almighty I hope you never have to appear before a court. You're completely incapable of making a sound argument.Catchy little phrase you cooked up there. Too bad it's complete gibberish.
So from what I understand, you want less people to vote and think that 100 years from now people will still be lining up to fill in paper ballots with pencils. Is that accurate?The internet under Soros control is mandatory. Soros is installing our voting abilities through his control. It isn't that he might, in the future, but now.
Are you afraid that this will let countries censor and control what their people are able to view? Because they can already do that. Are you afraid this will let countries censor and control what people in other countries are able to view? Then you don't know how the internet works.
You don't know how Soros works. He is in the process of having us use the internet as our voting booths. Sign up and vote, whoever you are. Then he will tell us who "we" elected.
You really don't have any idea what's happening do you?
First this:
NEW YORK – George Soros’s Open Society Foundations is seeking to expand the use of electronic and online voting systems nationwide, according to a leak
While the directive was issued two years ago, the issue of electronic voting has become a hot button topic in this year’s presidential election amid fears digital voting systems can be compromised.
The online voting plan was contained in a 67-page hacked file detailing the September 29-30, 2014 Open Society U.S. Programs board meeting in New York.
A significant portion of the board meeting was dedicated to methods the Foundation’s U.S. Programs (USP) could use to further the use of President Obama’s executive action authority to bypass Congress during Obama’s final two years in office.
Then this:
Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, currently serves on the board of George Soros’s Open Society Foundation and has close ties to the billionaire.
^ Brown is also this:
Smartmatic Group, an electronic voting firm whose worldwide headquarters is located in the United Kingdom.
^In charge of this:
Utah residents will have the option of casting ballots in the Republican presidential contest using computers, tablets, and smartphones next week. …
Online “polls” will be open between 7:00 a.m. and 11 p.m. on March 22. Voters will get a receipt that will verify that their vote was recorded correctly. The state party declined to release the number of online voter registrations that it has received. …
the goal:
“We expect all the jurisdictions across the U.S. to take notice and to look at this experience as something to study and, hopefully, follow,” said Antonio Mugica, founder and chief executive of Smartmatic Group, an election-equipment vendor that is running the Utah election.
As long as you trust this man, and believe that he has America's best interest at heart then, no need to worry.
When it comes right out of their mouths, and they boast about what they are doing, how do you say in your mind, "No. That's not really happening." ???
Oh and PS, Did you know that when you sign up for Obama care you register to vote? Odd coupling don't you think?
