🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Latest Moore accuser produced signed high school year book.

You and many on the Left had no problem with Clinton's numerous sexual atrocities. Why is Moore different?
Clinton was an adulterer....at least he stayed in the adult pool.
Maybe so, but many on Left did all they could to protect him before and after accusations were made public by several women. They then attacked those women ruthlessly, including Hillary. If Monica had not saved the blue dress, she would be considered a liar by many to this day. The Clinton's even set up a unit to handle "bimbo eruptions." Remember James Carville saying...

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

You are right they did, and now you are doing the exact same thing for Moore. What does that tell you about yourself?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
WTF...find one post by me excusing Moore. I don't give two shits about him. Dumbass!
 
You and many on the Left had no problem with Clinton's numerous sexual atrocities. Why is Moore different?
Clinton was an adulterer....at least he stayed in the adult pool.
Maybe so, but many on Left did all they could to protect him before and after accusations were made public by several women. They then attacked those women ruthlessly, including Hillary. If Monica had not saved the blue dress, she would be considered a liar by many to this day. The Clinton's even set up a unit to handle "bimbo eruptions." Remember James Carville saying...

“If you drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll find.”

It must be true, because that is the only way Carville could get a date because he was so butt ugly. What Mary Matalin saw in him is anybody's guess. Maybe he was seriously packing!
 
It's a forgery. Already proved.
WHo proved it to be a forgery? What handwriting expert?
It's obvious even to the most unpracticed eye that it's a forgery. Moore should sue every one of these women and whoever helped them.

IT'S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser's Yearbook Was FORGED


The arguments in that article for 'proving' that it's a forgery are extremely

WEAK

very, very

WEAK

First, the fact that there is a difference in the way the 7s are written, may show that some else wrote the upper '1977' - besides writing '1977' there deosn't make sense anyway, but it does not show that the rest of the writing is a forgery.

Second, the slight differences between his signatures in the year book and taken from a legal statement, probably years apart, are so minor that they in no way prove a forgery. Every one of us makes these slight differences in our signatures every time we sign. Over time anyone's signature can change.

 
It's a forgery. Already proved.
WHo proved it to be a forgery? What handwriting expert?
It's obvious even to the most unpracticed eye that it's a forgery. Moore should sue every one of these women and whoever helped them.

IT'S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser's Yearbook Was FORGED


The arguments in that article for 'proving' that it's a forgery are extremely

WEAK

very, very

WEAK

First, the fact that there is a difference in the way the 7s are written, may show that some else wrote the upper '1977' - besides writing '1977' there deosn't make sense anyway, but it does not show that the rest of the writing is a forgery.

Second, the slight differences between his signatures in the year book and taken from a legal statement, probably years apart, are so minor that they in no way prove a forgery. Every one of us makes these slight differences in our signatures every time we sign. Over time anyone's signature can change.

What about the fact that the signature says D.A. and he was not the D.A,, but the D.D.A.?

What about the name of the restaurant being written by another person and misspelled to boot?

Why would someone be signing a yearbook in December?
 
It's a forgery. Already proved.
WHo proved it to be a forgery? What handwriting expert?
It's obvious even to the most unpracticed eye that it's a forgery. Moore should sue every one of these women and whoever helped them.

IT'S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser's Yearbook Was FORGED


The arguments in that article for 'proving' that it's a forgery are extremely

WEAK

very, very

WEAK

First, the fact that there is a difference in the way the 7s are written, may show that some else wrote the upper '1977' - besides writing '1977' there deosn't make sense anyway, but it does not show that the rest of the writing is a forgery.

Second, the slight differences between his signatures in the year book and taken from a legal statement, probably years apart, are so minor that they in no way prove a forgery. Every one of us makes these slight differences in our signatures every time we sign. Over time anyone's signature can change.

What about the fact that the signature says D.A. and he was not the D.A,, but the D.D.A.?

What about the name of the restaurant being written by another person and misspelled to boot?

Why would someone be signing a yearbook in December?

Trying to impress a 16 year old so he put DA as she would not know the difference




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
It's a forgery. Already proved.
WHo proved it to be a forgery? What handwriting expert?
It's obvious even to the most unpracticed eye that it's a forgery. Moore should sue every one of these women and whoever helped them.

IT'S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser's Yearbook Was FORGED


The arguments in that article for 'proving' that it's a forgery are extremely

WEAK

very, very

WEAK

First, the fact that there is a difference in the way the 7s are written, may show that some else wrote the upper '1977' - besides writing '1977' there deosn't make sense anyway, but it does not show that the rest of the writing is a forgery.

Second, the slight differences between his signatures in the year book and taken from a legal statement, probably years apart, are so minor that they in no way prove a forgery. Every one of us makes these slight differences in our signatures every time we sign. Over time anyone's signature can change.

What about the fact that the signature says D.A. and he was not the D.A,, but the D.D.A.?

What about the name of the restaurant being written by another person and misspelled to boot?

Why would someone be signing a yearbook in December?

Trying to impress a 16 year old so he put DA as she would not know the difference




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Probably protected him from being reported
 
WHo proved it to be a forgery? What handwriting expert?
It's obvious even to the most unpracticed eye that it's a forgery. Moore should sue every one of these women and whoever helped them.

IT'S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser's Yearbook Was FORGED


The arguments in that article for 'proving' that it's a forgery are extremely

WEAK

very, very

WEAK

First, the fact that there is a difference in the way the 7s are written, may show that some else wrote the upper '1977' - besides writing '1977' there deosn't make sense anyway, but it does not show that the rest of the writing is a forgery.

Second, the slight differences between his signatures in the year book and taken from a legal statement, probably years apart, are so minor that they in no way prove a forgery. Every one of us makes these slight differences in our signatures every time we sign. Over time anyone's signature can change.

What about the fact that the signature says D.A. and he was not the D.A,, but the D.D.A.?

What about the name of the restaurant being written by another person and misspelled to boot?

Why would someone be signing a yearbook in December?

Trying to impress a 16 year old so he put DA as she would not know the difference




Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Probably protected him from being reported

Guy do all sorts of things trying to get into a girls pants. I cannot count the number of Marines I know that got busted for wearing "leave ribbons" while home trying to impress the girls back home. Now, granted they were 19 and 20 years old and not 32 hitting on 14 year olds.
 

Forum List

Back
Top