bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
But you say when I point where they quoted WAPO, that we have to refer to the article. So why should we believe your claims?They printed Phillip's story as if it was the unvarnished truth, and they didn't bother to investigate or interview anything that contradicted his story.Yes, and then the WP interviewed Phillips and printed his story. How is that libelous on the part of the WP?Why do you think that most adults would have suffered the abuse that the phony veteran was dishing out gladly?
Mr. Phillips didn't think that, that's why he decided to pester well behaved children instead of adults.
So you're saying the little shit sized up the old man and figured he could get away with that Smirk?
Tell us something we don't know.
no, the Phony Veteran came up to the child, Sandmann was just minding his own beeswax.
The Black Congressional Israelites had been hollering all kinds of filth at the Covington children for an hour, and Phillips decided to get in on the fun.
WRONG, trolley-trax Boi. They QUOTED Philips, and several others.
What would you have them do, change the quote to shit he never said?
Last edited: