Lead Prosecutor in Rittenhouse Political Prosecution Says Rittenhouse Chased His Antifa Attackers. Then He Shows Video Of Antifa Chasing Rittenhouse.

[Doc7505]

Prosecutors should be fired for incompetence

Rather for their prejudice and attempts to make the case into a murder when there is no evidence of murder.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

No, moron, I'm posting what I see in videos; not what the news is telling me. So once again you try to insult me but you end up looking like an idiot by getting it all wrong.

At 0:03 you can hear Joseph Ziminski fire the first shot, into the air.

EVERYTHING that happened after that MUST be considered in that context.

Felony charges against Ziminski were dropped. I wonder why.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, that medical examiner acknowledged Rosenbaum was "horizontal" when he was shot in the back. Rittenhouse was shooting down at him. Aside from your bullshit claim that was an exit wound, in what direction other than face down do you imagine Rosenbaum, who had already begun falling forward at or before the first shot, could have been facing?

All that can be true, AND it is still true that Rittenhouse was firing in self-defense and STOPPED when the threat stopped.

Are you ready to admit that it was self-defense, PARTICULARLY given that a gunshot went off nearby?

 

[Doc7505]

I think pop and fresh is going to skate. I'm not seeing a murder conviction.

More like Self defense in each of the cases.

 

[beautress]

The defense should request and be granted a directed verdict of not guilty, because the State failed to meet their burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

.

The prosecutor got harsh words from the judge because he was being very unethical. I don't know what happened since then because the judge recessed the trial because the Rittenhouse kid was crying because he went there to help a cause. not to get into the middle of a junkyard dog fiasco, and he had to shoot smartasses who tried to disarm and shoot him. He survived but shooting bullies was not on his list of what his peaceful intentions were.

 

[Jarlaxle]

And this response indicates your malice toward Rittenhouse. You want him to be guilty of something, anything.

He doesn't care, he just wants blood.

 

[TemplarKormac]

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, that medical examiner acknowledged Rosenbaum was "horizontal" when he was shot in the back. Rittenhouse was shooting down at him. Aside from your bullshit claim that was an exit wound, in what direction other than face down do you imagine Rosenbaum, who had already begun falling forward at or before the first shot, could have been facing?

The prosecutors aren't making that case, Faun. That's a game changer that they are sitting on. It would guarantee Rittenhouse's guilt. So why aren't they bringing this up on cross examination?

This is monumental evidence if true. Clearly you have more insight than the investigators do. Why didn't you submit this to the court during discovery?

Idiot. Because no evidence suggests what you are claiming. You are claiming that Rittenhouse executed Rosenbaum by shooting him in the back face down on the ground. The evidence does not suggest that, at all. Kelly said Rosenbaum had forward momentum toward Rittenhouse with his hand on the barrel at the time he was shot.

 

[Faun]

At 0:03 you can hear Joseph Ziminski fire the first shot, into the air.

EVERYTHING that happened after that MUST be considered in that context.

Felony charges against Ziminski were dropped. I wonder why.

He still shot Rosenbaum, lying face down on the ground, in the back. I say that's excessive force.

 

[Faun]

All that can be true, AND it is still true that Rittenhouse was firing in self-defense and STOPPED when the threat stopped.

Are you ready to admit that it was self-defense, PARTICULARLY given that a gunshot went off nearby?

Rosenbaum was down by the 3rd shot. The 4th wasn't necessary to stop the threat -- it had already been stopped.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Rosenbaum was down by the 3rd shot. The 4th wasn't necessary to stop the threat -- it had already been stopped.

You don't know that.

 

[Faun]

The prosecutors aren't making that case, Faun. That's a game changer that they are sitting on. It would guarantee Rittenhouse's guilt. So why aren't they bringing this up on cross examination?

This is monumental evidence if true. Clearly you have more insight than the investigators do. Why didn't you submit this to the court during discovery?

Idiot. Because no evidence suggests what you are claiming. You are claiming that Rittenhouse executed Rosenbaum by shooting him in the back face down on the ground. The evidence does not suggest that, at all. Kelly said Rosenbaum had forward momentum toward Rittenhouse with his hand on the barrel at the time he was shot.

The prosecutors were the ones to ask the medical examiner if Rosenbaum was "horizontal" when he was shot in the back and the medical examiner acknowledged he was.

 

[Fang]

Watching the trial… It’s clear the prosecution has nothing on Rittenhouse. Prosecution is trying his best to play word games and fabricate intent.

 

[Faun]

You don't know that.

Of course I do. It's on video.

 

[Jarlaxle]

False. If justice means he properly acted in self defense and is not guilty, I hope the jury decides that. As far as the jury, I'm good with either way they return. But the jury hasn't returned a verdict yet and from what I've seen, I believe he's guilty.

You're so full of shit your breath stinks.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Idiot. Because no evidence suggests what you are claiming. You are claiming that Rittenhouse executed Rosenbaum by shooting him in the back face down on the ground. The evidence does not suggest that, at all. Kelly said Rosenbaum had forward momentum toward Rittenhouse with his hand on the barrel at the time he was shot.

The ME negated the 'shoot in the back' argument. It's a non-starter.
Only bigots - who, by definition, already have the minds made up regqardless of the facts - hold on to this thread.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Of course I do. It's on video.

No it's not. I just watched it.

 

[basquebromance]

Gaige Grosskreutz‘s testimony has completely supported Kyle Rittenhouse's claims of self-defense. He also likely incriminated himself. End this trial!

 

[TemplarKormac]

The ME negated the 'shoot in the back' argument. It's a non-starter.

By doing/saying what, precisely? I didn't catch that.

 

[Faun]

No it's not. I just watched it.

Slobbers the blind idiot who actually said Rosenbaum's shot to the back was really an exit wound. You've already been caught making shit up. Who cares that you continue making shit up?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

He still shot Rosenbaum, lying face down on the ground, in the back. I say that's excessive force.

Witnesses testified otherwise. He never shot Rosenbaum while he was on the ground.

Video you provided is, at best, inconclusive, and you completely ignore the FIRST shot being fired behind Rittenhouse as Rosembaum attacked him from behind.