Lead Prosecutor in Rittenhouse Political Prosecution Says Rittenhouse Chased His Antifa Attackers. Then He Shows Video Of Antifa Chasing Rittenhouse.

I see. His momentum carried him in such a way that his back came to face the weapon as it was firing. Pretty straightforward now.
Comes down to how fast Rittenhouse was firing the weapon and how quickly Rosenbaum was falling forward. Makes complete sense.
Even then - you shoot to stop.
Still moving toward you = not stopped
 
I see. His momentum carried him in such a way that his back came to face the weapon as it was firing. Pretty straightforward now.

Comes down to how fast Rittenhouse was firing the weapon and how quickly Rosenbaum was falling forward. Makes complete sense.
4 defensive shots in less than 1 second is HARDLY excessive force, particularly when one of the other commie fucks fired a handgun in the air a second before Rosenbaum ASSAULTED Rittenhouse.
 
I doodled this.


Falling forward cased the last shot to go into the top of Rosenbaum's back as he lunged for Rittenhouse's rifle.View attachment 562607
LOLOL

No one needs your ridiculous doodle when we have actual video evidence. He's already going down as the first shot rings out. He's still falling when the second shot hits him. He's on the ground when the third shot hits. and he's on the ground when the 4th shot hits. But when the 4th shot hits, you see his head bob and then he never moves again.

McGinnis ran right over to him and found him on the ground. So how did he get there if nothing but his head moved after the 3rd shot, Sherlock?
 
Cities will burn. Liberals wil cheer.
But not in Texas.

They would get smoked and we all would cheer.

The communist revolution CANNOT succeed if the people can defend themselves.

THAT's why Faun's commie ass is so chapped. He knows that "America will NEVER be a Socialist country."

Right, Faun?

We have guns. You can't win.

:banana:
 
Nope.

Richie McGinniss was standing right there and he testified that Rittenhouse did not shoot him in the back, but that Rosenbaum was lunging forward.

The investigating officer also testified about how the shots landed.

You are too mad that your commie brothers GOT FUCKING SMOKED and you are looking for any reason to find guilt.

You will cry. We will laugh.
LOL

We know Rosenbaum was shot in the back...

screenshot_20211108-084056_samsung-internet-2-jpg.562573


If McGinnis testified he didn't see that, that doesn't mean he wasn't shot in the back, now does it?
 
But not in Texas.

They would get smoked and we all would cheer.

The communist revolution CANNOT succeed if the people can defend themselves.

THAT's why Faun's commie ass is so chapped. He knows that "America will NEVER be a Socialist country."

Right, Faun?

We have guns. You can't win.

:banana:
Right about what?
 
LOLOL

No one needs your ridiculous doodle when we have actual video evidence. He's already going down as the first shot rings out. He's still falling when the second shot hits him. He's on the ground when the third shot hits. and he's on the ground when the 4th shot hits. But when the 4th shot hits, you see his head bob and then he never moves again.

McGinnis ran right over to him and found him on the ground. So how did he get there if nothing but his head moved after the 3rd shot, Sherlock?
You don't even have the ability to clearly articulate what you believe was McGinnis' testimony.

You don't know anything about the evidence presented at trial. You are ignorant.

And you're mad as fuck.

Commies lose again. We will kill you if you try your stupid revolution AND YOU FUCKING KNOW IT!!!
 
You don't even have the ability to clearly articulate what you believe was McGinnis' testimony.

You don't know anything about the evidence presented at trial. You are ignorant.

And you're mad as fuck.

Commies lose again. We will kill you if you try your stupid revolution AND YOU FUCKING KNOW IT!!!
Nope, I watched the first few days of the trial. I don't recall everything McGinnis said. The fact remains, Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum in the back regardless of what McGinnis saw. There's simply no denying that. Unless you're a doodling idiot, that is.
 
And you'll note, if you're not completely blind ... he doesn't move again. Which means he's on the ground, face down.
Nope. The threat is still in motion.

4 shots is hardly excessive.

You wanted him to stop shooting at 2 shots, but if you knew cocksucking shit about it, you would know that you demand the impossible.

Sorry your idiot commie brother got smoked (not really).

Case closed.
 
Nope, I watched the first few days of the trial. I don't recall everything McGinnis said. The fact remains, Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum in the back regardless of what McGinnis saw. There's simply no denying that. Unless you're a doodling idiot, that is.
The facts also remain that Rittenhouse shot all rounds in self-defense at an attacker, regardless of where the projectiles landed.

Suck on that.

:banana:
 
Nope. The threat is still in motion.

4 shots is hardly excessive.

You wanted him to stop shooting at 2 shots, but if you knew cocksucking shit about it, you would know that you demand the impossible.

Sorry your idiot commie brother got smoked (not really).

Case closed.
LOL

Moron, the case is not closed until the jury returns a verdict.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top