Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure what texts are in question here but the first thing that occurs to me is that the entire subject of orientation often has no relevance to it's surrounding subject matter so why is it even apparent in the material? Unless of course that's the point.The question is, why do you think that the mere acknowledgement of gay people "promotes" the gay lifestyle?
Exactly....If you weren’t trying to promote the faggot lifestyle why would the reader need to know the character was gay? Could be just a story about any fully clothed kid right?
Not sure what texts are in question here but the first thing that occurs to me is that the entire subject of orientation often has no relevance to it's surrounding subject matter so why is it even apparent in the material? Unless of course that's the point.
I always hesitate when it comes to forcing people to make choices.... But with kids the margins are not so definite.First, I believe these are books that they were trying to ban from the school libraries.
Second, a lot of reading material you get in schools are kind of eclectic. In the Catholic HS I went to, required reading were Orwell's books, Shakespeare's plays, but also some contemporary writers as well, dealing with contemporary issues.
I always hesitate when it comes to forcing people to make choices.... But with kids the margins are not so definite.
I'd have to see the books they were talking about first. I have removed a number of books here in Massachusetts from my grandson's curriculum and informed the school that they needed to find an alternative method for those credits. Most of the stuff they offer is good but there's the occasional radical department head who's got an agenda... School should be for learning not for orienting.
what happens if a kid brings a gun to school that doesn't have any bullets.Seems safe to meUmm okay. Again think about this rationally. A kid picks up a book with gay characters in it. There’s no sex or nudity in it. That would do….what to the kid?
We are watching the new construction of a nanny state. Sure there have always been elements of it present but never like now. Hell....this effort isn't even subtle.We are not the children's parents.
I repeat. Not the children's parents.
It is not our job to see the children are raised with a certain set of values OTHER THAN those which facilitate a productive learning environment. That would include general kindness, consideration, sharing, etc. I have yet to meet a family who will PROFESS objection to those basic tenets.
I always hesitate when it comes to forcing people to make choices.... But with kids the margins are not so definite.
I'd have to see the books they were talking about first. I have removed a number of books here in Massachusetts from my grandson's curriculum and informed the school that they needed to find an alternative method for those credits. Most of the stuff they offer is good but there's the occasional radical department head who's got an agenda... School should be for learning not for orienting.
Umm okay. Again think about this rationally. A kid picks up a book with gay characters in it. There’s no sex or nudity in it. That would do….what to the kid?
Is being gay something someone does at a store? Or something someone does with a cock in their ass?So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.
Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?
Conservatives are removing 'pornographic' books from schools. Many feature LGBTQ+ characters.
Conservative politicians and activists have successfully removed more than 1,000 unique book titles from schools, often arguing they're too obscene.www.yahoo.com
Look. Faggots don't raise quality people. Faggots aren't quality people.Oh trust me I get that is your position. It’s simply an entirely emotional opinion that has no real world basis.
Look. Faggots don't raise quality people. Faggots aren't quality people.
If they were, they could have survived through all of human history until now...protected by real men who do real work protecting civilization.
Now fuck off and accept nature.
Have permanent custodyUm, so you have the ability to remove books from a curriculum for a GRANDCHILD?
They are easy to trigger that's for sureTrump: "watch this, I'll have them defending explicit faggot porn in children's books.... hold my Merlot..."
OMG the orange man is ass-raping you animals, and you're begging for more....
Clearly not a book ban.So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.
Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?
Conservatives are removing 'pornographic' books from schools. Many feature LGBTQ+ characters.
Conservative politicians and activists have successfully removed more than 1,000 unique book titles from schools, often arguing they're too obscene.
The sanctity of the Child is a prime target for the uber-progrssive humam hive advocates. The new norm for them is that there are no nominal parents. All children belong to All people....etc...etcClearly not a book ban.
The general public has access to all these books but schools do not. This has been the norm forever.
Some books are available to public school students others are not. They also do not have the Turner Diaries in schools nor should they.
While anyone outside government schools can look it up and read it such books should be in schools. The list goes on and on.
So do birth defects. That doesn't make it/them desirable.You do realize that homosexuality exists in nature, right?
if something is "unnatural" it's monogamy.
They didn't know what I was reading from the library.Adults most certainly are the arbiter of what children read. It's called supervision. The kids belong to the parents.
Translation:So republicans are concerned books are “pornographic” if they have gay characters in it. There doesn’t have to be sex or nudity in these books of course. They are simply pornographic for having gay characters lol. Republicans have the emotional maturity of 8th graders. This is ironic, of course, because they are pretending to they want to protect kids of such an age.
Think about this critically, republicans. Let’s say a kid’s book has a gay character in it who is fully clothed through out and a child read it. Do you really think with any rationality that this would turn the kid gay?
Conservatives are removing 'pornographic' books from schools. Many feature LGBTQ+ characters.
Conservative politicians and activists have successfully removed more than 1,000 unique book titles from schools, often arguing they're too obscene.
