Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then put your hand back on the table before it does.It's coming.
Not to mention study after study shows this program would explicitly benefit upper middle class/wealthy professions such as doctors and lawyers.
Funny how nobody is talking about the G.I. Bill. Draft dodger (asthma?) Biden's giveaway bill is an insult to every Veteran who gave up two or more years of Military service and went to college.
You're a socialist and practice responsibility displacement.
I want to be reimbursed for the money I spent to send my kids to college. $208,000 for one, and $90,000 for the other. Cool?
Quote the law giving Chicom Joe the authority to spend half a trillion forgiving loans.Well, congress did write the law giving the admin power to do this, with little restrictions.
The Supreme court should only be making their ruling on whether the law written by congress and passed in to law, covers the Biden admin for their action.
Not whether congress should make this decision because it is a lot of money....that is NOT something the SC should even consider, because it is NOT THEIR JOB... Their job is to decide if the action of the Biden admin is legal and constitutional and whether through the laws on the books, congress gave that power to the administration.
That being said, I think it is a mistake to forgive x amount of the student debt, without taking measures and changing laws, that caused the problem in the first place so it doesn't just continue...
BUT that is not the SC's job, their job is to determine if Biden can do this, under the law, and constitution.
I think that's a good idea, except for your purposeful insult about liberals!I'm still of the opinion that the schools themselves should cosign these loans. If they want to take the risk on low IQ liberal humanities students, let them regurgitate the money when their product turns out to be worthless in the real world.
Read the court case, it explains both sides of the argument.Quote the law giving Chicom Joe the authority to spen half a trillion forgiving loans.
The courts let Trump do it when he was president.Let the courts decide that.
Yes, judges who rule according to the Constitution. Gee, how partisan is that, huh.The courts let Trump do it when he was president.
But since the courts are now controlled by partisans looking for political outcomes, that’s meaningless.
What does the constitution have to say about appropriations again?Yes, judges who rule according to the Constitution. Gee, how partisan is that, huh.
You tell me. Go ahead.What does the constitution have to say about appropriations again?
The courts let Trump do it when he was president.
But since the courts are now controlled by partisans looking for political outcomes, that’s meaningless.
I think that's a good idea, except for your purposeful insult about liberals!
Something needs to be instituted in law that prevents loans going to schools that do not have more than 70 or 80% graduation and or placement in a job, rate.
And something needs to be in place to prevent schools from raising their school tuition when their school receives x- amount in yearly student loan money, or prevents any tuition hikes above X percentage or I dunno?
But this bull crap of college tuition going up, up, and up, MUST BE CURBED somehow.....imo....get backed loans should make school's costs go down, not up....?
Not in the least. Trump had to use emergency powers to send the money to fund the border wall which was not appropriated for it.Again with the apples and oranges. That money was already appropriated by the House for national defense. Stopping people from invading our country is national defense. Since Dementia opened up the border over 100 of those caught were on the Do Not Fly list. Others were convicted felons and gang members. We now have a record amount of fentanyl deaths. So stopping these people from entering our country is easily considered national defense.
Not to mention the 100,000 dead Americans each year from Biden’s fentanyl flooding across the borderAgain with the apples and oranges. That money was already appropriated by the House for national defense. Stopping people from invading our country is national defense. Since Dementia opened up the border over 100 of those caught were on the Do Not Fly list. Others were convicted felons and gang members. We now have a record amount of fentanyl deaths. So stopping these people from entering our country is easily considered national defense.
Trump's wall cost about $5 to 10 billion depending on who you ask.Not in the least. Trump had to use emergency powers to send the money to fund the border wall which was not appropriated for it.
Trump argued in court that he gets to decide what constitutes an emergency.
Doesn't Biden get the same consideration?