easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,144
So you are saying Russian businessmen who gave tbousands of shares of unreported stock to Hillary's campaing manager and donated millions to Hillary and Russian KGB paying Bill Clinton half a million a speech during the campaign was not in hopes of buying influence / favors if Hillary win? REALLY?I think that is the issue. Will Americans care if their news is manufactured by foreign entities and factually false? It's certainly true that the MSM have not covered the reality that small town rural Americans face. There's a reason for that, and the reason is simply advertising revenues. And the fact that urban dwellers don't seem to care.so easy, how much are the Russians paying you? Or are ya doing this for free?You gave me nothing. Snowflakes have no evidence of Russian collusion.if you did have an you should be running the Special Counsel instead of Mueller, who is still desperately searching for any.Vidence means everything when making accusations, or - in the snowflakes' case - FALSE accusations.
I gave you evidence in a link that you chose to not open. So you're making the choice to not consider evidence while saying you require evidence.
Fucking ridiculous.
he gave you a link, that showed you the republican super paks were in bed with the devil, the Russian gvt, you know....your god.
Trump is merely .... Trump. A con man media personality. He's not really central to the story beyond the fact that Russia thought it could get something from him being elected rather than Hillary. Trump may have broken the law in taking something of value from the Russians, but that's really a separate story.