Leftist Weasels Know They Can't WIN A Recount

Trump said the election was rigged.

Of course it was, by him and his buddies.
 
Petulant children, like you, or smart thinkers, unlike you, Tom?

Tom doesn't want anyone to look into the vote count because he is worried they may find something, he doesn't care if the votes were manipulated in anyway.

View attachment 100207

Where is the evidence of vote tampering or voter fraud?

There isn't any and there lies the problem. This all started because some moonbat professor squawked about exit polls and the left loons jumped on board.
"The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source."

Oh.....a "questionable trend"....lol

That's not evidence

I did not say it was evidence. I said it presented a reason to investigate further.
 
Petulant children, like you, or smart thinkers, unlike you, Tom?

Tom doesn't want anyone to look into the vote count because he is worried they may find something, he doesn't care if the votes were manipulated in anyway.

View attachment 100207

Where is the evidence of vote tampering or voter fraud?

There isn't any and there lies the problem. This all started because some moonbat professor squawked about exit polls and the left loons jumped on board.
"The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source."

Oh.....a "questionable trend"....lol

That's not evidence

I did not say it was evidence. I said it presented a reason to investigate further.

You need evidence...a reason such as that is not evidence of fraud.
 
Tom doesn't want anyone to look into the vote count because he is worried they may find something, he doesn't care if the votes were manipulated in anyway.

View attachment 100207

Where is the evidence of vote tampering or voter fraud?

There isn't any and there lies the problem. This all started because some moonbat professor squawked about exit polls and the left loons jumped on board.
"The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source."

Oh.....a "questionable trend"....lol

That's not evidence

I did not say it was evidence. I said it presented a reason to investigate further.

You need evidence...a reason such as that is not evidence of fraud.
To call a recount does not require a gassygirl preponderance of evidence.
 
They pass voter suppression laws, they gerrymander, if they actually governed as well as they cheated, they would win more elections.

Requiring a photo ID is "voter suppression"?...if it is, what isn't? Why would you want illegals and felons to vote...can't win fair and square?
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".
 
That's not their intention in the least...their real motive is to NEGATE the electoral votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. If any or all of the three states can't complete the "recount by hand" demand of the Clinton/Stein nitwits by December 19th, those states' electoral votes would go uncounted. ONE successful recount for Trump and it's over.. If they can disrupt all three states, that could deprive Trump of the 270 electoral votes needed and the election would move to a simple majority vote in the House of Representatives. Obviously Trump would win that vote but the Rats would have accomplished more chaos, which is their goal....petulant children that they are. :eusa_snooty:

983a014ee4044979c75c1a3d45b0266a.jpg


Scared of a recount huh?
 
They pass voter suppression laws, they gerrymander, if they actually governed as well as they cheated, they would win more elections.

Requiring a photo ID is "voter suppression"?...if it is, what isn't? Why would you want illegals and felons to vote...can't win fair and square?
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".

When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

All segments should be required to show ID, not just dumb, poor Democrats.
 
They pass voter suppression laws, they gerrymander, if they actually governed as well as they cheated, they would win more elections.

Requiring a photo ID is "voter suppression"?...if it is, what isn't? Why would you want illegals and felons to vote...can't win fair and square?
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".

When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

All segments should be required to show ID, not just dumb, poor Democrats.
Sure, if the government provides a free photo ID.
 
They pass voter suppression laws, they gerrymander, if they actually governed as well as they cheated, they would win more elections.

Requiring a photo ID is "voter suppression"?...if it is, what isn't? Why would you want illegals and felons to vote...can't win fair and square?
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".

When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

All segments should be required to show ID, not just dumb, poor Democrats.
Sure, if the government provides a free photo ID.

Sounds good.
 
That's not their intention in the least...their real motive is to NEGATE the electoral votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. If any or all of the three states can't complete the "recount by hand" demand of the Clinton/Stein nitwits by December 19th, those states' electoral votes would go uncounted. ONE successful recount for Trump and it's over.. If they can disrupt all three states, that could deprive Trump of the 270 electoral votes needed and the election would move to a simple majority vote in the House of Representatives. Obviously Trump would win that vote but the Rats would have accomplished more chaos, which is their goal....petulant children that they are. :eusa_snooty:

983a014ee4044979c75c1a3d45b0266a.jpg
Thank you for the explanation. I wondered why they were wasting everyone's time with this bullshit.
 
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".

What you're saying here is that BLACK PEOPLE don't have valid IDs and that's racist. Blacks carry ID just like everybody else. Saying that a photo ID doesn't prevent voter fraud is like saying seatbelts don't prevent head injuries in wrecks...absurd closet racism.
 
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".

What you're saying here is that BLACK PEOPLE don't have valid IDs and that's racist. Blacks carry ID just like everybody else. Saying that a photo ID doesn't prevent voter fraud is like saying seatbelts don't prevent head injuries in wrecks...absurd closet racism.
Actually, Tom, I am saying that 10-12% of eligible voters do have a photo ID. They are disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

I never said anything about racist, Tommy.

Where are your examples & statistics showing voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent?

And your seatbelt example is really dumb. People can & have injured their heads during accidents. We have statistics showing it.

We don;t have any stats showing significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent.
 
They pass voter suppression laws, they gerrymander, if they actually governed as well as they cheated, they would win more elections.

Requiring a photo ID is "voter suppression"?...if it is, what isn't? Why would you want illegals and felons to vote...can't win fair and square?
You are God damn right it is. When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

Tom, your party cheats & you are too stupid to know it.

There are NO statistics that show significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent. NONE.

As the Republican legislative leader said in PA after they passed a photo ID law: "we just gave PA to Romney".

When you require that a segment of eligible voters must obtain a specific ID to vote when that segment is disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

All segments should be required to show ID, not just dumb, poor Democrats.
Sure, if the government provides a free photo ID.

Many states offer a free non-drivers license photo ID card.
 
Petulant children, like you, or smart thinkers, unlike you, Tom?

Tom doesn't want anyone to look into the vote count because he is worried they may find something, he doesn't care if the votes were manipulated in anyway.

View attachment 100207

Where is the evidence of vote tampering or voter fraud?

There isn't any and there lies the problem. This all started because some moonbat professor squawked about exit polls and the left loons jumped on board.
"The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners, according to the source."

Oh.....a "questionable trend"....lol

That's not evidence


Nate Silver refuted their conclusions within a day or two.

that is what happens when an actual statistician does an analysis instead of 'computer scientists' citing statistical anomalies as reason enough to compel recounts.

in other words, they didn't have a clue what they were talking about in the first place, and were the wrong experts to be citing, as statistics is not their field of expertise in the first place.

and yet that ^^^^ giant ball of nothing is what all of this is based on.

good grief, people are just flat fucking stupid.
 
Actually, Tom, I am saying that 10-12% of eligible voters do have a photo ID. They are disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

I never said anything about racist, Tommy.

Where are your examples & statistics showing voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent?

And your seatbelt example is really dumb. People can & have injured their heads during accidents. We have statistics showing it.

We don;t have any stats showing significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent.

Of course you don't think you're racist...that's because you've been taught treating blacks as inferiors is only done by evil conservatives. But the truth is, your party destroyed their neighborhoods, put them in projects-prisons, and have kept them there to use as chattel for votes. Your racism is the most incidious because while you think you're protecting black and other minority rights, you're refusing to recognize their ability to protect their own rights. There's a YouTube video out where an ambush journalist asks blacks on the street if they carry ID...they are OFFENDED by the question. Time you rethought your own racism and trying to degrade me by calling me "Tommy" won't help you with that, Davey.
 
Actually, Tom, I am saying that 10-12% of eligible voters do have a photo ID. They are disproportionately poor & disproportionately Democrat voters.

I never said anything about racist, Tommy.

Where are your examples & statistics showing voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent?

And your seatbelt example is really dumb. People can & have injured their heads during accidents. We have statistics showing it.

We don;t have any stats showing significant voter fraud that a photo ID would prevent.

Of course you don't think you're racist...that's because you've been taught treating blacks as inferiors is only done by evil conservatives. But the truth is, your party destroyed their neighborhoods, put them in projects-prisons, and have kept them there to use as chattel for votes. Your racism is the most incidious because while you think you're protecting black and other minority rights, you're refusing to recognize their ability to protect their own rights. There's a YouTube video out where an ambush journalist asks blacks on the street if they carry ID...they are OFFENDED by the question. Time you rethought your own racism and trying to degrade me by calling me "Tommy" won't help you with that, Davey.
Tom Horn is mirroring his angst: it is really he is one of the evil conservatives treating blacks as inferiors. Yeah, Tommy, you are inside what you fear in others. That's why you fear a recount.
 
Tom Horn is mirroring his angst: it is really he is one of the evil conservatives treating blacks as inferiors. Yeah, Tommy, you are inside what you fear in others. That's why you fear a recount.

Hey, I'm pro-slavery, Lorraine....now back to your litter box...SHOO!
 

Forum List

Back
Top