Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course you do. Disingenuous anti-gun advocates need to stick together, amirite?I'm content to let our readers decide for themselves who is the disingenuous, lying fuckwad.You're dishonesty is apparent to all....
I vote for you.
No. I'm suggesting that Americans have a long heritage of individualism and distrust of government.Are you suggesting that psychological studies have shown that the cause of some Americans to have a love affair with guns was because we fought the bastard redcoats? I always thought it was because of John Wayne. Does anyone else know of other studies, and how did other Americans resist the love affair?
Is that why I support gay marriage and abortion? Immigration reform? You're a fucking liar and I've proved it. The fact you refuse to see it makes you simply another partisan asshole, as bad as those RWNJs you hate so much.Yep, you're very far right, out on the fringe.
Just wondering why some Americans have such a fascination with guns. Is it their need for a weapon, or other need? If so what is the need? Why do other not feel that need, and on and on.No. I'm suggesting that Americans have a long heritage of individualism and distrust of government.Are you suggesting that psychological studies have shown that the cause of some Americans to have a love affair with guns was because we fought the bastard redcoats? I always thought it was because of John Wayne. Does anyone else know of other studies, and how did other Americans resist the love affair?
If you have something specific to discuss, please bring it out.
BTW, an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Are you anti-science? Anti-logic? Do you favor emotion over reason?
The average person doesn't know how to make bombs. They would use the Internet and potentially be noticed by the FBI.
Funny to watch you jump so quickly on declaring me wrong when the Politifact link covered the facts. Next time, why don't you just read the link and quote it?WRONG!
The Right to vote is inferred in Sec. 2 of the 14th, the 15th, the 17th, the 19th, the 24th and the 26th Amendments to COTUS; and in Art. I, sec 2, clause 1; Art. IV, sec. 2.
Each of these links are clear, the right to vote is inherent in our democratic republic and their clarity is pure; unlike the syntax here, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
.
Why are you so obstinate? Is it because I'm kicking your ass on our Second Amendment rights? Or is it because you want to rewrite the Constitution in your own image and people like me are in your way?
I'm happy to do so. I swore an oath, at least seven times, to support and defend the Constitution. All of it. This is why I've always seen "gay marriage" as a 14th Amendment issue. Either give everyone the same rights and benefits or no one.Try reading past the 2nd amendment sometime .
What section of the Constitution would you like to discuss, if any?
all laws effect everyone, until they are broken. See speeders. They are presumably law abiding citizens until the drive faster than the legal limit. See bank robbers. Until they don the mask and give the teller a note, they too are law abiding citizens.
I'm doing it here. Why else would you start calling me a RWNJ despite the facts I'm much closer to being a moderate than you'll ever be?You couldn't kick my ass in any venue.
You see the 2nd as an absolute, It ain't.
Is that why I support gay marriage and abortion? Immigration reform? You're a fucking liar and I've proved it. The fact you refuse to see it makes you simply another partisan asshole, as bad as those RWNJs you hate so much.Yep, you're very far right, out on the fringe.
I support it.How about the 19th. Womens "right to vote".
Nice backpedal. Are you admitting you were wrong in your first assessment? If so, then apologize.In context, on the 2nd A. You're on the fringe, farther (further?) out than Scalia on the issue.
I support it.How about the 19th. Womens "right to vote".
That's incorrect, Timmy. Please let go of your emotions and reread my post again.But according to you we don't have a right to vote , so it's ok to place modern day restrictions like voter ID . But not ok to restrict any guns because of the rights in the 2nd ?
I support it.How about the 19th. Womens "right to vote".
That's incorrect, Timmy. Please let go of your emotions and reread my post again.But according to you we don't have a right to vote , so it's ok to place modern day restrictions like voter ID . But not ok to restrict any guns because of the rights in the 2nd ?
Secondly, do you know the difference between an enumerated right and an unemerated right? Do you understand the controversy over the Bill of Rights being written in the first place? Do you think the Constitution limits our rights as citizens or limits the powers of government?
Nice backpedal. Are you admitting you were wrong in your first assessment? If so, then apologize.In context, on the 2nd A. You're on the fringe, farther (further?) out than Scalia on the issue.
[
"Urban environment " ? You mean weapon of war right ?
This love affair that some Americans have with guns, has it ever been studied?
