Legal Definition of Gross Negligence

[Weatherman2020]

18 U.S.C Section 793-F Definition of 'gross negligence'.

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Unless you're one of the elite, which voids the above.

 

[BULLDOG]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

 

[BULLDOG]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Translation: you little people better stay in line.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Translation: you little people better stay in line.

It's always been that way in america, you just never cared before.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Translation: you little people better stay in line.

It's always ben that way in america, you just never cared before.

Nixon did a lot less.
Agnew did a lot less.
Petraus did a lot less.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Translation: you little people better stay in line.

It's always ben that way in america, you just never cared before.

Nixon did a lot less.
Agnew did a lot less.
Petraus did a lot less.

Like I say, you didn't care when it was them.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Translation: you little people better stay in line.

It's always ben that way in america, you just never cared before.

Nixon did a lot less.
Agnew did a lot less.
Petraus did a lot less.

Like I say, you didn't care when it was them.

Why do you freaks always need to lie?
Fuck you asshole.

 

[Hossfly]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"Ya don't go rollerskatin' in a buffalo herd; ya don't make IDIOTIC MISTAKES with secrets."

 

[BULLDOG]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"Ya don't go rollerskatin' in a buffalo herd; ya don't make IDIOTIC MISTAKES with secrets."

Wonderful example of right wing logic. You think Hillary is guilty because of buffaloes.

 

[NoNukes]

18 U.S.C Section 793-F Definition of 'gross negligence'.

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Unless you're one of the elite, which voids the above.

You have way too much time on your hands.

 

[Hossfly]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"Ya don't go rollerskatin' in a buffalo herd; ya don't make IDIOTIC MISTAKES with secrets."

Wonderful example of right wing logic. You think Hillary is guilty because of buffaloes.

Yes. Of course. Isn't that EXACTLY what I said?

 

[NoNukes]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"Ya don't go rollerskatin' in a buffalo herd; ya don't make IDIOTIC MISTAKES with secrets."

Wonderful example of right wing logic. You think Hillary is guilty because of buffaloes.

Have you never heard Melanie quoted in a political discussion?

 

[NoNukes]

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"Ya don't go rollerskatin' in a buffalo herd; ya don't make IDIOTIC MISTAKES with secrets."

Wonderful example of right wing logic. You think Hillary is guilty because of buffaloes.

Yes. Of course. Isn't that EXACTLY what I said?

You are showing your age quoting Melanie.

 

[JTalbain]

18 U.S.C Section 793-F Definition of 'gross negligence'.

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Unless you're one of the elite, which voids the above.

Actually, there is a key element missing there. For it to qualify as gross negligence, there needs to be a proven information leak. None of the info was proven "permit(ted) to be removed from its proper place of custody" and Hillary couldn't be proven to "hav(e) knowledge" it was "illegally removed" and failed to report it.

Gross. The disgusting way RWNJs are pouting because there was no reason found to indict her.

Except the FBI said she violated the law, AND said anyone else caught doing it will likely have charges filed.

They said there was NO precident for someone who made a similar mistake as her being prosecuted.

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Translation: you little people better stay in line.

That was one of the biggest points that Director Comey made. The law simply doesn't have the depth to apply to modern operations. The Espionage Act of 1917 hasn't received a single update since 1950. This is over two decades before the first email was ever sent. Quite simply, a subtlety like an "improper email server" is extremely difficult to bend the Act to cover because the very concept of email hadn't been conceived yet. During the Director's hearing, one of the senators even got flustered and asked "What would it take" to allow them to prosecute someone in this situation. Comey told him, "That's between you and the Justice Department." stating that what she did wasn't illegal under the law as written. They would be free to write a law to cover it in the future, but what they have now is insufficient. He went on to state that there would definitely be consequences to anyone still in state service, and that punishment could be anything from suspension, to loss of security clearance, to termination. But there would be no criminal charges. There's a difference between laws and rules.

Nixon did a lot less.
Agnew did a lot less.
Petraus did a lot less.

Which of the following does not belong?

A) Nixon- Proven criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice utilizing the CIA to hinder the FBI's investigation. Obstruction was intended to cover for his administration's felony breaking and entering, illegal government surveillance and violation of illegal search and seizure under the Constitution.
B) Agnew- Extortion, tax fraud, bribery, and conspiracy.
C) Petraeus- Willful distribution of vast quantities of classified information to someone without proper security clearance. Illegal storage of classified documents. Obstruction of justice by lying to investigating officers, who later recovered said documents with a warrant. (Comey actually addressed Petraeus' case as an example)
D) Clinton- Used an unapproved (but legal) email server to handle information. Caused the potential for a minor and unintentional information leak. No proven information leak, security breach, or intent to cause such.