LESTER HOLT WAS WRONG ABOUT STOP AND FRISK - Wall Street Journal

[B. Kidd]

Blacks are 13 per cent of the population. But if you landed here from another galaxy and watched MSM and Hollywood tripe (like the new Fox show that portrays a black woman breaking into MLB big leagues), you'd think that they were at least 50+ per cent of the population.
The axis of indoctrination (media, academia, and Hollywood) are hard at work this election year sewing major 'identity politics' seeds for the self annointed purveyors of social justice, Democraps!
Hell, even looks like they're setting up a future run for Michelle Obama..............

 

[PurpleOwl]

Wow, so stop and frisk is illegal in every municipality in America?

I had no idea. Thanks for clarifying. Lots of legal experts on this board.

It seems to me that the Supreme Court already ruled 8-1 on "STOP AND FRISK".

Can anyone link to the written Supreme Court opinion that "STOP AND FRISK" was deemed "UNCONSTIUTIONAL" and is illegal to use in the UNITED STATES?

Though police had long followed the practice of stop and frisk, it was not until 1968 that the Supreme Court evaluated it under the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Under Fourth Amendment case law, a constitutional Search and Seizure must be based on Probable Cause. A stop and frisk was usually conducted on the basis of reasonable suspicion, a somewhat lower standard than probable cause.

In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect had no permit. In this case the officer did not have a warrant nor did he have probable cause. He did suspect that the men were "casing" the store and planning a Robbery. The defendants argued the search was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment because it was not supported

terry stops are not the same thing as stop and frisk, police were stopping black people randomly searching their pockets and checking their ID's for nothing but walking down the street.

But most stop-and-frisks have nothing to do with solving “the murder,” or other specific crimes. As the NYCLU found, “Only 11 percent of stops in 2011 were based on a description of a violent crime suspect.” The rest of them were just random stops, and most of the people who are stopped turn out to be clean. Since 2003, between 87 and 90 percent of the hundreds of thousands of people stopped each year have turned out to be completely innocent of any wrongdoing.

Yes, Mayor Bloomberg, Stop-and-Frisk Is Really, Really Racist

 

[PurpleOwl]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

Talk about "UNEDUCATED"!!!
FACT:
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.
(Who by the way as Obama once said "did I mention, Williams is black"???

The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites.
Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent

Today...a single black female parent is the ONLY adult in a majority of black young boys lives.
Boys who never had a Dad to give the kid the "TALK"!
Now THE FACTS are I had a "talk" just as MOST Fathers have discussions with their sons regarding RESPECT!!!

The "Talk" like my Dad had with me...i.e. that the teacher, the policeman, the coach, the boss,most people that were my elders... deserve RESPECT!

My Dad told me that if I was ever reprimanded by a teacher, a coach, a policeman, the boss, or an elder, I'd receive an even more severe reprimand from him!
"Yes Sir or Mame" to anyone in authority. That simple.
Comply as quickly as possible to any request with no questions, no whining, no "back talk" as my Dad said to me. My Dad told me that if there was any question -- he sided/agreed with the teacher, a coach, a policeman, the boss, or an elder.


Now if you don't see how this relates to the hatred of cops and this growing ignorance by people like you who don't obviously RESPECT anyone then you
are obviously a typical idiot Hillary supporter!

THINK for once!
Watch what Chris Rock advises any black person who never had fathers to give them the "talk".
Chris Rock - How not to get your ass kicked by the police!

so it black people's fault for getting shot by police because they a race dont raise their children right? godamn it takes a real crazy person to take chris jokes seriously and try make a politcal message in favor of racist police tactics from it.

Maybe if their fathers weren't being arrested from the age of 12, didn't grow up in segregated ghettos, and weren't discriminated against at work they wouldn't be as many single mothers for you to scapegoat? which is the only reason why YOU are bringing up single mothers, to use them as a scapegoat

Are you retarded?
Who put them in segregared housing and communities?
Who doesnt want them to pick the school to.go.to?
Who babies them with affirmative action, instead of letting them earn a job and taking pride in that?
Who promotes a culture of decadence that kills the family and cause them to have waaay too many single parent households?
Who discourages them from working by giving out tons o welfare?

The answer is NOT Conservatives or republicans

If you think racist white conservatives are not responsible for segregation your living in a fantasy world and need new medication

 

[TooTall]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

 

[PurpleOwl]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

im guessing you dont live in a "high crime area"

 

[beagle9]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

im guessing you dont live in a "high crime area"

. And you live in Chicago (high crime area), where stop and frisk isn't in play maybe ?? What do you suggest in that situation ? Maybe carry around a bag of yummy marshmallows in order to get peace going again ? Maybe go back to having all sit down with the peace pipe, smoke some doobies, eat some munchies, and sing cumbaya together ???

 

[healthmyths]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

Talk about "UNEDUCATED"!!!
FACT:
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.
(Who by the way as Obama once said "did I mention, Williams is black"???

The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites.
Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent

Today...a single black female parent is the ONLY adult in a majority of black young boys lives.
Boys who never had a Dad to give the kid the "TALK"!
Now THE FACTS are I had a "talk" just as MOST Fathers have discussions with their sons regarding RESPECT!!!

The "Talk" like my Dad had with me...i.e. that the teacher, the policeman, the coach, the boss,most people that were my elders... deserve RESPECT!

My Dad told me that if I was ever reprimanded by a teacher, a coach, a policeman, the boss, or an elder, I'd receive an even more severe reprimand from him!
"Yes Sir or Mame" to anyone in authority. That simple.
Comply as quickly as possible to any request with no questions, no whining, no "back talk" as my Dad said to me. My Dad told me that if there was any question -- he sided/agreed with the teacher, a coach, a policeman, the boss, or an elder.


Now if you don't see how this relates to the hatred of cops and this growing ignorance by people like you who don't obviously RESPECT anyone then you
are obviously a typical idiot Hillary supporter!

THINK for once!
Watch what Chris Rock advises any black person who never had fathers to give them the "talk".
Chris Rock - How not to get your ass kicked by the police!

so it black people's fault for getting shot by police because they a race dont raise their children right? godamn it takes a real crazy person to take chris jokes seriously and try make a politcal message in favor of racist police tactics from it.

Maybe if their fathers weren't being arrested from the age of 12, didn't grow up in segregated ghettos, and weren't discriminated against at work they wouldn't be as many single mothers for you to scapegoat? which is the only reason why YOU are bringing up single mothers, to use them as a scapegoat

ABSOLUTELY! If idiots LIKE YOU and the IDiOTS that get shot don't understand then you and they DO deserve to be shot!
But once again idiots like you ignore the FACTS.
FACTS are MORE WHITES are shot then Blacks!
BLACKS commit more crimes that Whites in proportion to their numbers.
BUT idiots like you don't seem to believe reality. And my comments weren't meant for idiots like you!

The solution is simple. Since there isn't a DAD in the family the Big Brother program should be really assisted. Instead of "Black Lives Matter" being funded by
Soros and other idiots WHY not fund the Big Brother program? Why not even pay black men to be surrogate Dads?
Teaching the young black men respect? That's what we are describing here but idiots like you long ago ignore RESPECT!
My great uncle in WWII was killed simply because he didn't respect his squad leader when he told him "keep your head down"... the idiot raised his head
and was killed in the training exercise when they were firing live ammo. RESPECT for your leaders,your elders,,,, people that have been there and know
you don't unless you have something to hide ignore a police command put up your hands!!!
Only idiots get shot! It's called Darwin award winners! So YES I have NO problem blaming those single mothers!
Are you aware of these statistics?

36.6% were performed on women with one or two prior abortions, and
8.1% were performed on women with three or more prior abortions (CDC).
44.7% or nearly half by women are either stupid, definitely don't use birth control continue to act as pre-meditated murders at that point.
U.S. Abortion Statistics

So while the black population makes up only 12.6% of USA population THEY committed 52.5% of the murders!
Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America are on black women.
According to the FBI, in 2011, of the 197 million white people 6.58 million committed a crime.

http://talkback4teens.com/2013/08/29/do-blacks-really-commit-the-most-crimes/

 

[Rocko]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

 

[TooTall]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

im guessing you dont live in a "high crime area"

That would be a good guess. If I did live in a high crime area I would be considerably more interested in stop and frisk being in use.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

Along with other programs being instituted which never get mentioned in the conversation. The stop and frisk program ended and the stats haven't blown up.

 

[PurpleOwl]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

im guessing you dont live in a "high crime area"

. And you live in Chicago (high crime area), where stop and frisk isn't in play maybe ?? What do you suggest in that situation ? Maybe carry around a bag of yummy marshmallows in order to get peace going again ? Maybe go back to having all sit down with the peace pipe, smoke some doobies, eat some munchies, and sing cumbaya together ???

its interesting how republicans become the biggest supporters of gun control when its directed solely at blacks and hispanics, its almost as if the republican party is a white supremacist organization

 

[PurpleOwl]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

Talk about "UNEDUCATED"!!!
FACT:
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University.
(Who by the way as Obama once said "did I mention, Williams is black"???

The truth is that black female-headed households were just 18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In fact, from 1890 to 1940, the black marriage rate was slightly higher than that of whites.
Even during slavery, when marriage was forbidden for blacks, most black children lived in biological two-parent families.
In New York City, in 1925, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent

Today...a single black female parent is the ONLY adult in a majority of black young boys lives.
Boys who never had a Dad to give the kid the "TALK"!
Now THE FACTS are I had a "talk" just as MOST Fathers have discussions with their sons regarding RESPECT!!!

The "Talk" like my Dad had with me...i.e. that the teacher, the policeman, the coach, the boss,most people that were my elders... deserve RESPECT!

My Dad told me that if I was ever reprimanded by a teacher, a coach, a policeman, the boss, or an elder, I'd receive an even more severe reprimand from him!
"Yes Sir or Mame" to anyone in authority. That simple.
Comply as quickly as possible to any request with no questions, no whining, no "back talk" as my Dad said to me. My Dad told me that if there was any question -- he sided/agreed with the teacher, a coach, a policeman, the boss, or an elder.


Now if you don't see how this relates to the hatred of cops and this growing ignorance by people like you who don't obviously RESPECT anyone then you
are obviously a typical idiot Hillary supporter!

THINK for once!
Watch what Chris Rock advises any black person who never had fathers to give them the "talk".
Chris Rock - How not to get your ass kicked by the police!

so it black people's fault for getting shot by police because they a race dont raise their children right? godamn it takes a real crazy person to take chris jokes seriously and try make a politcal message in favor of racist police tactics from it.

Maybe if their fathers weren't being arrested from the age of 12, didn't grow up in segregated ghettos, and weren't discriminated against at work they wouldn't be as many single mothers for you to scapegoat? which is the only reason why YOU are bringing up single mothers, to use them as a scapegoat

ABSOLUTELY! If idiots LIKE YOU and the IDiOTS that get shot don't understand then you and they DO deserve to be shot!
But once again idiots like you ignore the FACTS.
FACTS are MORE WHITES are shot then Blacks!
BLACKS commit more crimes that Whites in proportion to their numbers.
BUT idiots like you don't seem to believe reality. And my comments weren't meant for idiots like you!

The solution is simple. Since there isn't a DAD in the family the Big Brother program should be really assisted. Instead of "Black Lives Matter" being funded by
Soros and other idiots WHY not fund the Big Brother program? Why not even pay black men to be surrogate Dads?
Teaching the young black men respect? That's what we are describing here but idiots like you long ago ignore RESPECT!
My great uncle in WWII was killed simply because he didn't respect his squad leader when he told him "keep your head down"... the idiot raised his head
and was killed in the training exercise when they were firing live ammo. RESPECT for your leaders,your elders,,,, people that have been there and know
you don't unless you have something to hide ignore a police command put up your hands!!!
Only idiots get shot! It's called Darwin award winners! So YES I have NO problem blaming those single mothers!
Are you aware of these statistics?

36.6% were performed on women with one or two prior abortions, and
8.1% were performed on women with three or more prior abortions (CDC).
44.7% or nearly half by women are either stupid, definitely don't use birth control continue to act as pre-meditated murders at that point.
U.S. Abortion Statistics

So while the black population makes up only 12.6% of USA population THEY committed 52.5% of the murders!
Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America are on black women.
According to the FBI, in 2011, of the 197 million white people 6.58 million committed a crime.

http://talkback4teens.com/2013/08/29/do-blacks-really-commit-the-most-crimes/

none of those statistics are real and your statement that black people "deserve to get shot" shows your real opinion, if your going to pretend not to be a white supremacist try to resist the urge to call for genocide

 

[Rocko]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

Along with other programs being instituted which never get mentioned in the conversation. The stop and frisk program ended and the stats haven't blown up.

So taking away all those illegal guns from people did nothing to combat crime? Yeah ok

 

[PurpleOwl]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

Along with other programs being instituted which never get mentioned in the conversation. The stop and frisk program ended and the stats haven't blown up.

So taking away all those illegal guns from people did nothing to combat crime? Yeah ok

so your in favor of gun control?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Feds should have stopped and frisked every one of those RWnuts at the Bundy standoff.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

Along with other programs being instituted which never get mentioned in the conversation. The stop and frisk program ended and the stats haven't blown up.

So taking away all those illegal guns from people did nothing to combat crime? Yeah ok

so your in favor of gun control?

He is as long as it isn't colorblind.

 

[Rocko]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

Along with other programs being instituted which never get mentioned in the conversation. The stop and frisk program ended and the stats haven't blown up.

So taking away all those illegal guns from people did nothing to combat crime? Yeah ok

so your in favor of gun control?

I'm in favor of getting guns out of the hands of bad guys...u?

 

[TooTall]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

im guessing you dont live in a "high crime area"

. And you live in Chicago (high crime area), where stop and frisk isn't in play maybe ?? What do you suggest in that situation ? Maybe carry around a bag of yummy marshmallows in order to get peace going again ? Maybe go back to having all sit down with the peace pipe, smoke some doobies, eat some munchies, and sing cumbaya together ???

its interesting how republicans become the biggest supporters of gun control when its directed solely at blacks and hispanics, its almost as if the republican party is a white supremacist organization

It is interesting that you blame Republcans for gun control. The strictest gun laws in the country are in Chicago and Democrats have ruled there for decades. That last GOP Mayor was elected in 1927.

 

[PurpleOwl]

Holt was right. It was ruled unconstitutional.

The program doesn't work.

To say it doesn't work is disingenuous. I mean a lot of illegal guns were confiscated during stop and frisk. And the bottom line is stop and frisk changed the trajectory of gun violence in NYC.

Along with other programs being instituted which never get mentioned in the conversation. The stop and frisk program ended and the stats haven't blown up.

So taking away all those illegal guns from people did nothing to combat crime? Yeah ok

so your in favor of gun control?

I'm in favor of getting guns out of the hands of bad guys...u?

by bad guys do you mean black guys?

 

[PurpleOwl]

so your advocating more racist police tactics? who cares if its unconstitutional or not? Advocates against stop and frisk aren't retards who hide behind legal loopholes. There are real reasons why stop and frisk should be stopped and whether or not the judge who ruled it unconsitutional or not was biased against cops, isn't one of them and shouldn't matter. It is a distraction from the issue and couldn't be more of a non-answer. You would think with protests in every major city against racist police violence that suggesting a policy that was ruled was ruled racist and unconstiutional would be the last thing a major politician would tie himself too. Much less one who has already been accused of racism multiple times, for mutliple reasons.

I guess we can add the fact that Donald supports stop and frisk, to the long list of reasons of why donald trump is racist. Thanks to nothing but his own ignorant, undeducated, big mouth

I don't have a problem with stop and frisk in high crime areas. Why would anyone?

im guessing you dont live in a "high crime area"

. And you live in Chicago (high crime area), where stop and frisk isn't in play maybe ?? What do you suggest in that situation ? Maybe carry around a bag of yummy marshmallows in order to get peace going again ? Maybe go back to having all sit down with the peace pipe, smoke some doobies, eat some munchies, and sing cumbaya together ???

its interesting how republicans become the biggest supporters of gun control when its directed solely at blacks and hispanics, its almost as if the republican party is a white supremacist organization

It is interesting that you blame Republcans for gun control. The strictest gun laws in the country are in Chicago and Democrats have ruled there for decades. That last GOP Mayor was elected in 1927.

thats a myth Chicago gun laws not as strict as GOP candidates claim