Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
- Aug 5, 2010
- 42,407
- 7,739
You really have no comprehension skills, do you. I am not expecting an answer, beings because of the comprehension thing, so don't hurt yourself.Lazy, you are too lazy to read your "article" let alone quote the correct portion. Just pointing out that you have a very shallow understanding of what you read, given the gross errors in your post. Follow your own links.It is true based on an Article, you are joking.I don't know if he is, but I am saying it...because it's true.
An October 2011 report by Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute found that, of gay and lesbian adoptions at more than 300 agencies, 10 percent of the kids placed were older than 6 — typically a very difficult age to adopt out. About 25 percent were older than 3. Sixty percent of gay and lesbian couples adopted across races, which is important given that minority children in the foster system tend to linger. More than half of the kids adopted by gays and lesbians had special needs.
First and foremost, to make the point you contend you quoted the wrong portion of your, "article". The portion you erroneously quoted speaks strictly of the percentages of specific groups of children adopted, not if the "gays and lesbians" were more willing to adopt a special need child.
Do you read you links, I do.
And why bother quoting an article that is reporting from their biases and prejudices, why quote the article when the article gives you the name of the study or institute.
In replying I will check you article, I will find the study, and read it, at that point I will have a better understanding of your source than you have displayed.
Now go quote the right part.
Can you provide an article showing that more than half of heterosexuals raise special needs children? Are you too lazy to click on links within the article?
I guess you are not going to fix your mistakes, fine with me.
Can I provide an article showing more than half of heterosexuals raise special needs children? Nope, just aint that many special needs kids, more than half of all kids with special needs? That would be millions? Yes?
As I side note, I see that your article left out Eunuchs, that kind of ruins its validity, you know, in The Land of the Seawytch.
Deflection. The point was made. You questioned whether gays and lesbians were more likely to adopt special needs children. I showed you that in fact gays and lesbians are more likely to adopt special needs children.
An October 2011 report by Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute found that, of gay and lesbian adoptions at more than 300 agencies, 10 percent of the kids placed were older than 6 — typically a very difficult age to adopt out. About 25 percent were older than 3. Sixty percent of gay and lesbian couples adopted across races, which is important given that minority children in the foster system tend to linger. More than half of the kids adopted by gays and lesbians had special needs.
Deflection? I never questioned whether gays and lesbians were more likely to adopt special needs children, I asked somebody a question to clarify their post in case I misunderstood what they were stating.
You are that dumb. And I guess I am as well for not questioning your first post with a "what the hell are you talking about"?
I got to remember you do not read, not your links, not your articles, not your studies, I just assumed you actually read the posts you respond to, stupid me.
You question, which I responded to, was right there above your post. Here is is again so you can see it:
Elektra: Are you stating that Homosexual couples are more willing than Heterosexual couples to raise handicapped children?
Your question was answered and the answer was yes.