Let's celebrate the Right to Keep and Bear arms...something the rest of the world has surrendered....

You never told us what school massacre are you planning to celebrate. That is the most damaging outcome of the centuries old 2nd Amendment...that and your bizarre acceptance of kids being murdered.

Really...what the fuck is wrong with you?

Of the two of us you and the other anti- gun extremists love school shootings…..they help you with your anti- gun mania.
 
Of the two of us you and the other anti- gun extremists love school shootings…..they help you with your anti- gun mania.

You're the one who refuses to acknowledge school shootings ( you said zero occurred in 2017 when I showed you just 3 of the many that took place). So you're the one who thinks "only" one dead kid is acceptable.

Really, what in the fuck is wrong with you?
 
Are you really sick enough to not know the difference between accidental deaths and murders?

Really..what in the fuck is wrong with you?

Cars kill more people accidentally than guns do when criminals use them illegally…….if you weren’t stupid you would see that that shows that cars are deadlier than guns……..and according to your own “logic” that means we need to ban and confiscate cars.
 
You're the one who refuses to acknowledge school shootings ( you said zero occurred in 2017 when I showed you just 3 of the many that took place). So you're the one who thinks "only" one dead kid is acceptable.

Really, what in the fuck is wrong with you?

Mother Jones, the anti gun,
Left wing extremist news source didnt log those shootings…..none of you anti-gun extremists knew about them as well……

Even with them?

138 deaths in 29 years

Cars over 39,000 killed in 2019.
 
Cars kill more people accidentally than guns do when criminals use them illegally…….if you weren’t stupid you would see that that shows that cars are deadlier than guns……..and according to your own “logic” that means we need to ban and confiscate cars.

Your idiocy is truly incredible. Accidental deaths are not the same as the murders you shrug off.

Really, what in the fuck is wrong with you?
 
Mother Jones, the anti gun,
Left wing extremist news source didnt log those shootings…..none of you anti-gun extremists knew about them as well……

Even with them?

138 deaths in 29 years

Cars over 39,000 killed in 2019.

Again...do you not know the difference between accidents and murders? Really?

What in the fuck is wrong with you?
 
Again...do you not know the difference between accidents and murders? Really?

What in the fuck is wrong with you?

I know the difference and if you have 138 deaths in 29 years versus 39,000 deaths in one year and every year you would have to be really stupid to not see cars are
Deadlier than guns….
 
OK dipshit.....answer these....


and again, any woman reading these posts....note that the left wing anti-gunners refuse to answer the following simple questions.......that should tell you all you need to know about you, your safety and where you rank in their beliefs......
And AGAIN, you think the left-wing wants to ban guns.
A woman is grabbed by a violent serial rapist at a bus stop, a train platform or in her apartment...he plans on beating, raping and murdering her. She has a gun, and can stop the rape with the gun......
Do you want her to use that gun to stop the rape?
Of course, thank god she has her AK-47 with her on her way to the dentist.

A woman stops an attack with a gun, a brutal rape, torture and murder...in a public space....if you had the ability to go back in time, and prevent her from having that gun...would you?
NO.
======
The British government will not allow a woman to own and carry a gun to prevent being gang raped in a London park.....saying she does not have "good reason," to own the gun.
Nothing stopping her from carrying a knife.
What she needs is an AR-15.
A member of the House of Lords wants to quail hunt with his rich friends on his private country estate, and the British government gives him the gun....because he has "good reason."

Does this make sense to you?
Even they have to have a license and a registered weapon.
 
Yes....the Europeans did what you want and first registered, then turned in their guns...on the promise it would make them all safer...this happened in the 1920s...

By the end of the 1930s, the registered guns were confiscated....and the mass murder began...
You're SO, FOS.

1928 the Law on Firearms and Ammunition was enacted. It relaxed gun restrictions as to ownership (but not as to their use and instruction on their use, as these were still illegal according to the Versailles Treaty) and put into effect a strict firearm licensing scheme.
Under this scheme, Germans could possess firearms, but were required to have separate permits to do the following: own or sell firearms, carry firearms (including handguns), manufacture firearms, and professionally deal in firearms and ammunition.
Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "... persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit."

The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. But under the new law:

  • Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, and the possession of ammunition.
  • The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.
  • Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.
  • Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.

  • Manufacture of arms and ammunition continued to require a permit, with the proviso that such permits would no longer be issued to any company even partly owned by Jews; Jews could not manufacture or deal in firearms or ammunition.

Did turning in their guns actually make them safer....the numbers of murder victims say no...

German socialists
Horseshit.
You blame gun confiscation for jews being in concentration camps?
By genocide, the murder of hostages, reprisal raids, forced labor, "euthanasia," starvation, exposure, medical experiments, and terror bombing, and in the concentration and death camps, the Nazis murdered from 15,003,000 to 31,595,000 people, most likely 20,946,000 men, women, handicapped, aged, sick, prisoners of war, forced laborers, camp inmates, critics, homosexuals, Jews, Slavs, Serbs, Germans, Czechs, Italians, Poles, French, Ukrainians, and many others. Among them 1,000,000 were children under eighteen years of age.1

And none of these monstrous figures even include civilian and military combat or war-deaths

[/URL]
 
You're the one who refuses to acknowledge school shootings ( you said zero occurred in 2017 when I showed you just 3 of the many that took place). So you're the one who thinks "only" one dead kid is acceptable.

Really, what in the fuck is wrong with you?
Have you not noticed, 2aguy cherry-picks data to fit his "arguments" while ignoring any data that might contradict him. This is another reason he floods threads with the same copy/paste BS because the more you repeat something, the more likely people are to believe it as truth. He's basically just a "firehose of falsehoods".
 
Have you not noticed, 2aguy cherry-picks data to fit his "arguments" while ignoring any data that might contradict him. This is another reason he floods threads with the same copy/paste BS because the more you repeat something, the more likely people are to believe it as truth. He's basically just a "firehose of falsehoods".
Its debunked boilerplate lies...over and over.

I'm of the opinion that there are places in the nation where not having a gun to protect yourself is almost negligent....so I'm not against gun ownership. The notion though that anyone should be able to go into any store and buy as many guns as they can afford no questions asked is batshit crazy as our number of gun deaths every year confirm.
 
Its debunked boilerplate lies...over and over.

I'm of the opinion that there are places in the nation where not having a gun to protect yourself is almost negligent....so I'm not against gun ownership. The notion though that anyone should be able to go into any store and buy as many guns as they can afford no questions asked is batshit crazy as our number of gun deaths every year confirm.
Of course, they want people to jump through hoops to vote.

Guns?..........................no shirt, no shoes, no ID....................no problem.
 
You're SO, FOS.

1928 the Law on Firearms and Ammunition was enacted. It relaxed gun restrictions as to ownership (but not as to their use and instruction on their use, as these were still illegal according to the Versailles Treaty) and put into effect a strict firearm licensing scheme.
Under this scheme, Germans could possess firearms, but were required to have separate permits to do the following: own or sell firearms, carry firearms (including handguns), manufacture firearms, and professionally deal in firearms and ammunition.
Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "... persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit."

The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. But under the new law:

  • Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, and the possession of ammunition.
  • The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.
  • Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.
  • Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP (the National Socialist German Workers' Party) members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.

  • Manufacture of arms and ammunition continued to require a permit, with the proviso that such permits would no longer be issued to any company even partly owned by Jews; Jews could not manufacture or deal in firearms or ammunition.


Horseshit.
You blame gun confiscation for jews being in concentration camps?


Moron....you guys always point to party members owning guns, never to the fact that Jews and political enemies of the socialists had their guns taken......you know, the ones they actually murdered.
 
Have you not noticed, 2aguy cherry-picks data to fit his "arguments" while ignoring any data that might contradict him.
Did you noticed how every time someone points out the fallacy of your 'UK gun laws reduce gun-related crime' nonsense, you ignore it?
I did.

 
Last edited:
YES, they are.
NOT without a background check and a license.
What background check / license do I need to buy/own this?

1641397822308.png
 
Moron....you guys always point to party members owning guns, never to the fact that Jews and political enemies of the socialists had their guns taken......you know, the ones they actually murdered.
WTF? IDIOT.
Let's review dumbass.

'
  • Manufacture of arms and ammunition continued to require a permit, with the provison that such permits would no longer be issued to any company even partly owned by Jews; Jews could not manufacture or deal in firearms or ammunition.

The vast majority of Democrats include gun bans as part of their campaign platform.
Are they lying abut their intention?
No, you are.......as usual.
They are talking of banning stupid guns for stupid people, that brand.
Of course, Trumptards get their panties in a bunch.
 

Forum List

Back
Top