Let's make something clear.

[eagle1462010]

You were condescending when you advised I “educate myself” when it was you who was misinformed and wrong.

That is why you deserve condescension.

I am the one who is better informed.

You are a Fascist wanna be.

 

[Marener]

What is it that you don't understand about DUE PROCESS? You just aren't up to the task. BTW, what school gave you your degree in constitutional law. I wouldn't want my kids to go there.

I understand more about due process than you.

He had due process. The case was heard in court, with a trial, represented by lawyers, introduced evidence, called witnesses, cross examined.

That’s due process.

 

[Marener]

You are a Fascist wanna be.

Trump tried to take away the votes of millions of Americans simply because they voted for Biden and not for him.

He’s the wannabe fascist.

 

[eagle1462010]

He had due process. There was a trial. He wasn’t convicted.

Nope. Not even close. And if that is a Fair Trial then we can do the same to you. Off the ballots for BLM and inciting riots.

Did people taking selfies make you piss your pants that day.

 

[Concerned American]

It’s not a criminal case. The Supreme Court or Colorado held he engaged in insurrection.

What you say is irrelevant. You have no authority.

Neither does the CO supreme court. BTW Insurrection damn sure is a crime as defined by

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection​

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

www.law.cornell.edu

Try again, moron. You are proving yourself to stupid to understand FACTS. Keep parroting the same democrat BS.

 

[Marener]

Nope. Not even close. And if that is a Fair Trial then we can do the same to you. Off the ballots for BLM and inciting riots.

Did people taking selfies make you piss your pants that day.

Are you denying there was a trial or what are you saying?

 

[eagle1462010]

Trump tried to take away the votes of millions of Americans simply because they voted for Biden and not for him.

He’s the wannabe fascist.

You fuckers cheated. Everyone knows. People went their to protest it. Oh fucking well.

Your side burned cities for a half year.

So screw you.

 

[Marener]

Neither does the CO supreme court. BTW Insurrection damn sure is a crime as defined by

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection​

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

www.law.cornell.edu

Try again, moron. You are proving yourself to stupid to understand FACTS. Keep parroting the same democrat BS.

The Colorado Supreme court has no aithority?

That’s, uh, incredibly stupid.

 

[Concerned American]

He had due process. There was a trial. He wasn’t convicted.

Please link to the trial. There has been NOBODY charged or convicted of insurrection as a result of the J6 RIOT. Even the msm is backtracking on using that term.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Historical precedent also confirms that a criminal conviction is not required for an individual to be disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. No one who has been formally disqualified under Section 3 was charged under the criminal “rebellion or insurrection” statute (18 U.S.C. § 2383) or its predecessors. This fact is consistent with Section 3’s text, legislative history, and precedent, all of which make clear that a criminal conviction for any offense is not required for disqualification. Section 3 is not a criminal penalty, but rather is a qualification for holding public office in the United States that can be and has been enforced through civil lawsuits in state courts, among other means.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/r...eports/past-14th-amendment-disqualifications/

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary. Reconstruction Era federal prosecutors brought civil actions in court to oust officials linked to the Confederacy, and Congress in some cases took action to refuse to seat Members. Congress last used Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1919 to refuse to seat a socialist Congressman accused of having given aid and comfort to Germany during the First World War, irrespective of the Amnesty Act. The Congressman, Victor Berger, was eventually seated at a subsequent Congress after the Supreme Court threw out his espionage conviction for judicial bias. Recently, various groups and organizations have challenged the eligibility of certain candidates running for Congress, arguing that the candidates’ alleged involvement in the events surrounding the January 6, 2021, breach of the Capitol render them ineligible for office. No challenges have to date resulted in the disqualification of any congressional candidate. A New Mexico state court, however, has removed Otero County Commissioner County Griffin from office and prohibited him from seeking or holding any future office based on his participation in, and preparation for, the January 6 interruption of the election certification.

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10569

Absent evidence in contradiction of CREW's assertion I suspect Trumpleton's will ineffectually attack CREW and or the CRS. It is the Trumpian way. When facts and evidence fail them they rely on what amounts to character assassination. Which is why Trump attacks the media, anyone who opposes him, and most especially those like Jack Smith who are working to hold Don accountable for his illegal actions.

Furthermore, quite a bit has been made about the removal of a candidate's name from the ballot being anti-democratic. Yet the Constitution itself tells us that it is the conduct that gives rise to disqualification under the 14th Amendment that is anti-democratic. From the moment Trump began the anti-democratic act of conspiring to steal the election he violated his oath of office and forfeited his right to once again run to be the prez.

Without an adjudication there is no due process, you stupid prick.

 

[22lcidw]

One of the cale channels runs a program called "The men who built America". A percentage of them were not very nice. We live great lives compared to people in other eras. In major part because of them. They were on the private side even though they used the public side like the wars and such. Today, the Progs have reversed it. The public side is the guiding light now. Only it isn't and we spend massive amounts of resources now to produce what the government decrees.

 

[eagle1462010]

Neither does the CO supreme court. BTW Insurrection damn sure is a crime as defined by

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection​

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

www.law.cornell.edu

Try again, moron. You are proving yourself to stupid to understand FACTS. Keep parroting the same democrat BS.

No one has been convicted of that charge. Only 12 in our history.

Was a Civil War law. Now being abused in theory by these clowns. No one has been found guilty of it.

 

[Marener]

You fuckers cheated. Everyone knows. People went their to protest it. Oh fucking well.

Your side burned cities for a half year.

So screw you.

Please show where these “cheaters” were convicted or STFU.

 

[eagle1462010]

Are you denying there was a trial or what are you saying?

Insurrection is specific law. Show me the conviction or STFU

 

[eagle1462010]

Please show where these “cheaters” were convicted or STFU.

No no. Your the one playing Insurrection. Show who is found guilty of it or STFU

 

[Marener]

Please link to the trial. There has been NOBODY charged or convicted of insurrection as a result of the J6 RIOT. Even the msm is backtracking on using that term.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

See the procedural history section. The trial is detailed on page 13 and 14.

 

[eagle1462010]

The Colorado Supreme court has no aithority?

That’s, uh, incredibly stupid.

The law they are using. Show me that Conviction.

Oh well SCOTUS will overturn all of this.

They were why your side Lost your shit when he won.

 

[Marener]

No no. Your the one playing Insurrection. Show who is found guilty of it or STFU

"no no"

You realize you've stepped in your own shit now.

Show us the convictions of all these cheaters, you know the ones that you use to justify reversing the outcome of the election.

 

[Marener]

Insurrection is specific law. Show me the conviction or STFU

Still waiting for you to show me where a conviction is required by the 14th amendment.

It's not, never has been.

 

[eagle1462010]

"no no"

You realize you've stepped in your own shit now.

Show us the convictions of all these cheaters, you know the ones that you use to justify reversing the outcome of the election.

BS

Show me the conviction or STFU. That goes for your Juducial activist too