Let's make something clear.

[eagle1462010]

Still waiting for you to show me where a conviction is required by the 14th amendment.

It's not, never has been.

Still waiting for you to show a conviction.

 

[Marener]

BS

Show me the conviction or STFU. That goes for your Juducial activist too

So you have double standards.

No convictions needed to take away millions of votes.

Convictions needed to keep Trump off the ballot.

That makes you the little wannabe fascist.

 

[Marener]

Still waiting for you to show a conviction.

There is none.

And none is required.

Was Jefferson Davis eligible to run for president after the Civil War?

 

[scruffy]

The court disagrees.

Better luck next time.

More libtard kangaroo courts?

 

[eagle1462010]

So you have double standards.

No convictions needed to take away millions of votes.

Convictions needed to keep Trump off the ballot.

That makes you the little wannabe fascist.

Only Fascist here is you.

Using tax payers dollars to attack political opponents.

You are your Cult have shown what you are now.

 

[Leo123]

Meanwhile, Colorado put Trump back on the ballot.

MSN

 

[Marener]

Only Fascist here is you.

Using tax payers dollars to attack political opponents.

You are your Cult have shown what you are now.

Trump is claiming he was using his office of president to take away millions of votes of people because they didn't vote for him.

Trump is getting what he deserved because of the actions he took.

 

[Concerned American]

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf

See the procedural history section. The trial is detailed on page 13 and 14.

I'm done with you. A court cannot unilaterally declare someone guilty of a crime without due process. I will be here to present you with a full plate of crow after the SCOTUS declares the CO garbage null and void.

 

[Leo123]

Trump is claiming he was using his office of president to take away millions of votes of people because they didn't vote for him.

Trump is getting what he deserved because of the actions he took.

 

[Dr.Know]

Historical precedent also confirms that a criminal conviction is not required for an individual to be disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. No one who has been formally disqualified under Section 3 was charged under the criminal “rebellion or insurrection” statute (18 U.S.C. § 2383) or its predecessors. This fact is consistent with Section 3’s text, legislative history, and precedent, all of which make clear that a criminal conviction for any offense is not required for disqualification. Section 3 is not a criminal penalty, but rather is a qualification for holding public office in the United States that can be and has been enforced through civil lawsuits in state courts, among other means.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/r...eports/past-14th-amendment-disqualifications/

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary. Reconstruction Era federal prosecutors brought civil actions in court to oust officials linked to the Confederacy, and Congress in some cases took action to refuse to seat Members. Congress last used Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1919 to refuse to seat a socialist Congressman accused of having given aid and comfort to Germany during the First World War, irrespective of the Amnesty Act. The Congressman, Victor Berger, was eventually seated at a subsequent Congress after the Supreme Court threw out his espionage conviction for judicial bias. Recently, various groups and organizations have challenged the eligibility of certain candidates running for Congress, arguing that the candidates’ alleged involvement in the events surrounding the January 6, 2021, breach of the Capitol render them ineligible for office. No challenges have to date resulted in the disqualification of any congressional candidate. A New Mexico state court, however, has removed Otero County Commissioner County Griffin from office and prohibited him from seeking or holding any future office based on his participation in, and preparation for, the January 6 interruption of the election certification.

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10569

Absent evidence in contradiction of CREW's assertion I suspect Trumpleton's will ineffectually attack CREW and or the CRS. It is the Trumpian way. When facts and evidence fail them they rely on what amounts to character assassination. Which is why Trump attacks the media, anyone who opposes him, and most especially those like Jack Smith who are working to hold Don accountable for his illegal actions.

Furthermore, quite a bit has been made about the removal of a candidate's name from the ballot being anti-democratic. Yet the Constitution itself tells us that it is the conduct that gives rise to disqualification under the 14th Amendment that is anti-democratic. From the moment Trump began the anti-democratic act of conspiring to steal the election he violated his oath of office and forfeited his right to once again run to be the prez.

Lets Lie Steal Kill and do everything to keep Trump out of the Race so the Multinationals , Intel agencies and Bankers can start more wars for profit,,,,take away rights and our living standard, spy on our every move and sell us poison foods for extreme profits YAYYYY Trumps a racist boo put him in jail . Hooray for the Deep State ,,, vote Deep State ( DEMOCRAT).

 

[Concerned American]

Trump is claiming he was using his office of president to take away millions of votes of people because they didn't vote for him.

Please link to that lie.

 

[eagle1462010]

I'm done with you. A court cannot unilaterally declare someone guilty of a crime without due process. I will be here to present you with a full plate of crow after the SCOTUS declares the CO garbage null and void.

Hes a dirt bag. Hell the DNC are dirt bags.

 

[scruffy]

Where does the Bill of Rights say a conviction is required? You realize the Bill of Rights predates the 14th amendment, so the idea it enforces requirements on the amendment is pretty absurd.

Libtards are dangerously stupid.

 

[Marener]

I'm done with you. A court cannot unilaterally declare someone guilty of a crime without due process. I will be here to present you with a full plate of crow after the SCOTUS declares the CO garbage null and void.

You guys love saying "due process" but after I ask and ask and ask, you never say what you mean by that.

I think it's likely that SCOTUS will reverse the decision. I've never said otherwise. I won't be eating any crow, thanks.

 

[Marener]

Hes a dirt bag. Hell the DNC are dirt bags.

You're a dope. Just repeating talking points without having the slightest inclination to do any thinking for yourself.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[eagle1462010]

You're a dope. Just repeating talking points without having the slightest inclination to do any thinking for yourself.

Show me a conviction or STFU

 

[Marener]

Please link to that lie.

That's the basis for his claims of immunity in his prosecution.

Trump's lawyers ask appeals court to rule on immunity in late-night filing

Donald Trump's lawyers are telling a federal appeals court that he was acting within his role as president when he pressed claims about "alleged fraud and irregularity" in the 2020 election.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Marener]

Show me a conviction or STFU

I've already explained it to you.

 

[eagle1462010]

I've already explained it to you.

And weve alteady shown you are full of BS