Let's make something clear.

[Marener]

Sorry, You big poopyhead. I win again.

I accept your concession.

 

[Marener]

Yeah, yeah, yeah. You are part of the commie party that believes that all they have to do is claim a law is broken and have a partisan court agree. That is called a summary judgement--not due process. Good example of the fallacy is you believe a cop should be convicted of murder if a known violent felon dies of an overdose while in his custody but you see nothing wrong with the summary execution of an unarmed protestor by a capitol cop for protesting. Partisan, double standard bull hockey.

Uh, no. There was a trial. Not a summary judgement. The trial included witnesses, evidence, cross examination. Not sure what you mean by lack of due process. No one seems to know.

Trump claimed there was election fraud and demanded that he be named president by the court. How is that any different?

 

[Rawley]

I accept your concession.

Sorry poopyhead, I already won.

 

[Marener]

Sorry poopyhead, I already won.

There’s nothing to win.

 

[Lesh]

Who does the 14th give sole power to enforce the 14th, Simp?.

What?

 

[Concerned American]

Uh, no. There was a trial. Not a summary judgement. The trial included witnesses, evidence, cross examination. Not sure what you mean by lack of due process. No one seems to know.

Trump claimed there was election fraud and demanded that he be named president by the court. How is that any different?

Everyone knows there was no due process. You do too. You are just trolling with nothing but nonsense to offer. I noticed another poster seems to have discovered a perfect handle you should replace yours with---Moron er

 

[Marener]

Everyone knows there was no due process. You do too. You are just trolling with nothing but nonsense to offer. I noticed another poster seems to have discovered a perfect handle you should replace yours with---Moron er

“Everyone knows” is such a lazy response.

No, everyone doesn’t know that. You don’t know it either. That’s just what you’re told and so you keep repeating it without having any idea what it means or why you’re saying it.

 

[Concerned American]

“Everyone knows” is such a lazy response.

No, everyone doesn’t know that. You don’t know it either. That’s just what you’re told and so you keep repeating it without having any idea what it means or why you’re saying it.

Have another drink, moron. Everything you've posted today is PURE BULLSHIT. Time will prove it and you can bet the farm I will be sure to let you know. I will expect to see your apology---LMAO although, I won't hold my breath. Democrats only lie and deny it when caught.

 

[noonereal]

The poor pay the most tax? Gotta link noonereal

% of income

 

[Independent thinker]

Historical precedent also confirms that a criminal conviction is not required for an individual to be disqualified under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. No one who has been formally disqualified under Section 3 was charged under the criminal “rebellion or insurrection” statute (18 U.S.C. § 2383) or its predecessors. This fact is consistent with Section 3’s text, legislative history, and precedent, all of which make clear that a criminal conviction for any offense is not required for disqualification. Section 3 is not a criminal penalty, but rather is a qualification for holding public office in the United States that can be and has been enforced through civil lawsuits in state courts, among other means.
https://www.citizensforethics.org/r...eports/past-14th-amendment-disqualifications/

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment does not expressly require a criminal conviction, and historically, one was not necessary. Reconstruction Era federal prosecutors brought civil actions in court to oust officials linked to the Confederacy, and Congress in some cases took action to refuse to seat Members. Congress last used Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1919 to refuse to seat a socialist Congressman accused of having given aid and comfort to Germany during the First World War, irrespective of the Amnesty Act. The Congressman, Victor Berger, was eventually seated at a subsequent Congress after the Supreme Court threw out his espionage conviction for judicial bias. Recently, various groups and organizations have challenged the eligibility of certain candidates running for Congress, arguing that the candidates’ alleged involvement in the events surrounding the January 6, 2021, breach of the Capitol render them ineligible for office. No challenges have to date resulted in the disqualification of any congressional candidate. A New Mexico state court, however, has removed Otero County Commissioner County Griffin from office and prohibited him from seeking or holding any future office based on his participation in, and preparation for, the January 6 interruption of the election certification.

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10569

Absent evidence in contradiction of CREW's assertion I suspect Trumpleton's will ineffectually attack CREW and or the CRS. It is the Trumpian way. When facts and evidence fail them they rely on what amounts to character assassination. Which is why Trump attacks the media, anyone who opposes him, and most especially those like Jack Smith who are working to hold Don accountable for his illegal actions.

Furthermore, quite a bit has been made about the removal of a candidate's name from the ballot being anti-democratic. Yet the Constitution itself tells us that it is the conduct that gives rise to disqualification under the 14th Amendment that is anti-democratic. From the moment Trump began the anti-democratic act of conspiring to steal the election he violated his oath of office and forfeited his right to once again run to be the prez.

Let's make this clear:

MSN

 

[Marener]

Have another drink, moron. Everything you've posted today is PURE BULLSHIT. Time will prove it and you can bet the farm I will be sure to let you know. I will expect to see your apology---LMAO although, I won't hold my breath. Democrats only lie and deny it when caught.

I can help you save some of your valuable time.

Next time type “nuh uh” and it’ll say the exact same thing you’ve spent so many words spreading.

What exactly should I apologize for?

 

[Concerned American]

% of income

So you figure someone paying 11% of their poverty wage is paying more percentage-wise than a member of the most affluent 10% of the population that is paying 30+%. You're a moron. They don't pay more in actual dollars OR percentage of their wage.

 

[Concerned American]

I can help you save some of your valuable time.

Next time type “nuh uh” and it’ll say the exact same thing you’ve spent so many words spreading.

What exactly should I apologize for?

Lying to begin with. Wasting people's time with nonsense, circuitous garbage to carry on. Now run along, junior. It is far beyond your bedtime.

 

[Marener]

Lying to begin with. Wasting people's time with nonsense, circuitous garbage to carry on. Now run along, junior. It is far beyond your bedtime.

What did I lie about?

 

[Concerned American]

What did I lie about?

Better question is what DIDN'T you lie about.

 

[talksalot]

I don't think this stuff is a good idea, but it's pretty clear the Trumpsters don't understand the rule or how it's being applied.

All they know is rage and revenge.

The Confederacy existed.

"Peacefully and patriotically Let your voices be heard."
No proof of a government takeover, no one was armed...
The "Insurrection" didn't happen just like all the other crimes Democrats say Trump did but never proved.

Lawfare based on LIES.

 

[Marener]

Better question is what DIDN'T you lie about.

i asked a simple enough question. Your answer is conspicuously missing.

 

[Marener]

The Confederacy existed.

"Peacefully and patriotically Let your voices be heard."
No proof of a government takeover, no one was armed...
The "Insurrection" didn't happen just like all the other crimes Democrats say Trump did but never proved.

Lawfare based on LIES.

Was Jefferson Davis ever convicted or rebellion or insurrection?

 

[Concerned American]

i asked a simple enough question. Your answer is conspicuously missing.

Your inability to comprehend is disingenuous.

 

[Concerned American]

Was Jefferson Davis ever convicted or rebellion or insurrection?

He declared war on the US. Any other stupid questions.