Liberal fascism

When your only defense against a claim is saying the dictionary is biased and can't be trusted, you should rethink your standpoint a little bit.
Wrong. The dictionary is biased. They are all written by a gang of liberals.

What you are doing here is called the appeal to authority. It's a logical fallacy.
And so ... your 'definition' of the word, "fascist," comes from.....?
 
Yeah, that's a hoax. The SPLC is a communist propaganda organ. They classified the IEW has a hate organization. Nothing they claim can be believed.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.


That's hyperbole, moron.
Nonsense.

The Democratic Party? Smash it.

The mainstream media? Crush it.

Academia? Nuke it ‘til it glows, preferably from orbit.
That shit is something Hitler would say.
One of the aspects of fascism is one-party rule. Ironically, these idiots are advocating exactly that even as they project fascism upon the left.
 
Yeah, that's a hoax. The SPLC is a communist propaganda organ. They classified the IEW has a hate organization. Nothing they claim can be believed.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.


That's hyperbole, moron.
Nonsense.

The Democratic Party? Smash it.

The mainstream media? Crush it.

Academia? Nuke it ‘til it glows, preferably from orbit.
That shit is something Hitler would say.
One of the aspects of fascism is one-party rule. Ironically, these idiots are advocating exactly that even as they project fascism upon the left.

That's also an aspect of communism/socialism.

You haven't proven jack shit.
 
Yeah, that's a hoax. The SPLC is a communist propaganda organ. They classified the IEW has a hate organization. Nothing they claim can be believed.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.


That's hyperbole, moron.
Nonsense.

The Democratic Party? Smash it.

The mainstream media? Crush it.

Academia? Nuke it ‘til it glows, preferably from orbit.
That shit is something Hitler would say.
One of the aspects of fascism is one-party rule. Ironically, these idiots are advocating exactly that even as they project fascism upon the left.

That's also an aspect of communism/socialism.

You haven't proven jack shit.
You poor dumbfuck. Benito Mussolini proved it.

Your ignorance aside, I note, you still haven't said where your definition of fascism comes from since it obviously does not come from Fascist Italy.
 
And so ... your 'definition' of the word, "fascist," comes from.....?

MiddleFingerBaby's

images
 
Yeah, that's a hoax. The SPLC is a communist propaganda organ. They classified the IEW has a hate organization. Nothing they claim can be believed.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.


That's hyperbole, moron.
Nonsense.

The Democratic Party? Smash it.

The mainstream media? Crush it.

Academia? Nuke it ‘til it glows, preferably from orbit.
That shit is something Hitler would say.
One of the aspects of fascism is one-party rule. Ironically, these idiots are advocating exactly that even as they project fascism upon the left.

That's also an aspect of communism/socialism.

You haven't proven jack shit.
You poor dumbfuck. Benito Mussolini proved it.

Your ignorance aside, I note, you still haven't said where your definition of fascism comes from since it obviously does not come from Fascist Italy.

I've already posted my definition of fascism. It comes from Mises.org, and, no, Mussolini proved exactly what I said
 
Yeah, that's a hoax. The SPLC is a communist propaganda organ. They classified the IEW has a hate organization. Nothing they claim can be believed.
Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.


That's hyperbole, moron.
Nonsense.

The Democratic Party? Smash it.

The mainstream media? Crush it.

Academia? Nuke it ‘til it glows, preferably from orbit.
That shit is something Hitler would say.
One of the aspects of fascism is one-party rule. Ironically, these idiots are advocating exactly that even as they project fascism upon the left.

That's also an aspect of communism/socialism.

You haven't proven jack shit.
You poor dumbfuck. Benito Mussolini proved it.

Your ignorance aside, I note, you still haven't said where your definition of fascism comes from since it obviously does not come from Fascist Italy.

I've already posted my definition of fascism. It comes from Mises.org, and, no, Mussolini proved exactly what I said
You get your word definitions from an Austrian Instistute website, comprised of articles that can be and probably are influenced by bias?
 
One of the aspects of fascism is one-party rule. Ironically, these idiots are advocating exactly that even as they project fascism upon the left.
I read something funny today. It basically raised the point maybe Trump and the Gang are not good enough to create a fascist, authoritarian government.

Hitler was able to parlay his minority into implacable power because he organized a rigid, disciplined crew of sociopaths on a mission. Trump has the gang that couldn’t shoot straight.

To have an authoritarian state, you have to possess
not just the impulse to authoritarianism but the talent for it...

If Trump isn’t a fascist, or at least a successful one, he is something nearly as bad: Donald Trump is a solipsistic anarchist.
A what? I had to look that word up. Apparently, a solipsistic, is someone who believes in the theory that only the self exists. Now I'm not saying this is the reality we are facing, but it is an interesting perspective on The Donald and his "Our Gang" of Republicans.

In any case, we've gone from being a super-power, to a super-joke.

 
The left around the globe is trying to leverage the homosexual community for fascist control the way they've tried to leverage political correctness for fascist control...
Harold Albrecht, a Conservative Party member of Parliament from Kitchener, Ontario, says the bill presents threats in “four areas.”
  • “I am concerned that this bill would cause fear for many Canadians, fear that they would not be able to even discuss public policy issues, such as this one, on which they may disagree with the government-imposed agenda,” said Albrecht on the floor of Parliament.
  • “I am concerned about the potential harm to innocent children and youth as a result of the possible invasion of their privacy.
  • I am concerned that the terms ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression’ are very subjective terms, far too subjective to be used in the context of legal documents, particularly in the Canadian Human Rights Act or the Criminal Code of Canada.”
  • “Finally, I am concerned that when government adopts dramatic changes to public policy as it relates to gender identity and sexuality, with minimal research or support, the results could be harmful for all members of society, but especially for those we are actually trying to help; that is, transgendered children or youth,” said Albrecht.
That is exactly what the left-wing agenda sets out to achieve. Very vague language which they can leverage over the people as very broad powers.

Canada considers controversial new ‘gender identity’ bill: ‘This bill would cause fear’
 
the SPLC also classified White Lives Matter as a hate group but refused to classify Black Lives Matter as one......

the spcl is a leftist hate group that of course will not label a leftist hate group as a hate group....splc is about as bad as the aclu...
Black Lives Matter is not a hate group.
 
If Trump isn’t a fascist, or at least a successful one, he is something nearly as bad: Donald Trump is a solipsistic anarchist.
Fascism is complete government control (authoritarian). Anarchy is the complete absence of government. A sentence where one claims another individual is at least an anarchist if they are not a fascist is the epitome of stupid. It's like saying if President Trump is not obese, he is at least an anorexic.
 
That is exactly what the left-wing agenda sets out to achieve. Very vague language which they can leverage over the people as very broad powers.

How is the progressive, more tolerant political party trying to leverage people? Republicans are generally more against minorities.
 
Last edited:
Fascism is complete government control (authoritarian). Anarchy is the complete absence of government. A sentence where one claims another individual is at least an anarchist if they are not a fascist is the epitome of stupid. It's like saying if President Trump is not obese, he is at least an anorexic.
It also means "...state of disorder due to nonrecognition of authority."
 

Forum List

Back
Top