- Banned
- #1
Time after time through mainstream Liberal news outlets we notice a particular pattern of conspicuous censorship in any event that involves Black perpetrators: mall riots...street fights...flash-mobs...restaurant brawls...gang attacks against Whites...etc..etc. In each of these reported events the perps are described as "teens' or 'young people' thereby giving the false impression of deliberate vagueness. Even when video confirmation is available media editors will not openly report 'Black Flash Mob' or 'Black gang attack'. Not only is this profoundly irresponsible journalism it is also dangerous to the extent that it acts as a kind of pardon-system for an emerging culture of Black offenders. The apparent paradox is that at some conscious level of media standards a transparent Liberal agenda has been imposed though excessive PC logic: ie Blacks are an oppressed group and media should act to attenuate the otherwise wide perceptions of violent criminal behavior statistically skewed to them.
The particular relevance here doesn’t necessarily involve the stated content of Black indignation toward Whites, but alas the bland, artless predictability and self-deluded claims routinely advanced through advocacy groups like 'BlackLivesMatter'…essentially there is no argument beyond the established caricatures that have become nearly gospel to an array of credulous liberal voices whose admonishments tell us considerably more about them than the dynamics of the issue at hand, so impossibly tilted toward a demonization of attenuated aspects and behaviors of police-culture and white culture that the impulse to any balance is lost to an extent that makes it effortless to correct. The argument rigidly avoids even minor reference to decades of escalating Black criminality and internal killings. Liberal axioms dictate that Blacks shall be depicted as lost innocent victims of a sinister overarching white oppressor-culture in which white privilege is graciously imbued by virtue of complexion, irrespective of the broad range of variation and diversity entailed by the charge. To this end the conscious mechanism is to truncate the flaws of the one culture--Blacks, while simultaneously inflating the proposed manipulation and putative ingrained racism of the accused culture--Whites. This level of simplistic distortion ultimately grants the accuser the self-regulated perception of both honesty and tendentious anger, blissfully oblivious to the heavy-handed distortions that paved this conclusion. Essentially the BLM argument is constructed out of sand…they limit or completely dismiss the most rudimentary considerations of cause-n-effect---or imperative balance--- because these steadily mounting acknowledgments would eventually topple their pretensions. The protestations amount to a back-door variant of racism, masquerading as misguided liberation theology…in other words they lack the basic honestly to uncloak their racism and hypocrisy and call it out…pathetic doesn’t begin to describe this position
The particular relevance here doesn’t necessarily involve the stated content of Black indignation toward Whites, but alas the bland, artless predictability and self-deluded claims routinely advanced through advocacy groups like 'BlackLivesMatter'…essentially there is no argument beyond the established caricatures that have become nearly gospel to an array of credulous liberal voices whose admonishments tell us considerably more about them than the dynamics of the issue at hand, so impossibly tilted toward a demonization of attenuated aspects and behaviors of police-culture and white culture that the impulse to any balance is lost to an extent that makes it effortless to correct. The argument rigidly avoids even minor reference to decades of escalating Black criminality and internal killings. Liberal axioms dictate that Blacks shall be depicted as lost innocent victims of a sinister overarching white oppressor-culture in which white privilege is graciously imbued by virtue of complexion, irrespective of the broad range of variation and diversity entailed by the charge. To this end the conscious mechanism is to truncate the flaws of the one culture--Blacks, while simultaneously inflating the proposed manipulation and putative ingrained racism of the accused culture--Whites. This level of simplistic distortion ultimately grants the accuser the self-regulated perception of both honesty and tendentious anger, blissfully oblivious to the heavy-handed distortions that paved this conclusion. Essentially the BLM argument is constructed out of sand…they limit or completely dismiss the most rudimentary considerations of cause-n-effect---or imperative balance--- because these steadily mounting acknowledgments would eventually topple their pretensions. The protestations amount to a back-door variant of racism, masquerading as misguided liberation theology…in other words they lack the basic honestly to uncloak their racism and hypocrisy and call it out…pathetic doesn’t begin to describe this position
