Liberalism: Making the French Revolution Its Own.

[PoliticalChic]

1. Having made the irreparable error of gaining their knowledge of history from 'professors' in those bastions of Liberalism, the universities, far too many millennials believe that the French Revolution was, in any way tantamount, duplicate, analogous to our American Revolution.

It was not.


2. Our revolution produced documents and a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, the beliefs of Classical Liberals, or what we call 'conservatives' today. Its template was the amalgam of Judeo-Christian biblical tradition and Anglo-Saxon Common Law.
It is for this reason that America did not become the abattoir, the slaughter house, that France became.


a. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

b. The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh

Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.” Coulter




3. The truth about the French Revolution is strenuously hidden those captives, the university students, because the Liberals in charge wish to hide the fact that it was the precursor of every evil totalitarian regime in modern times.

" If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century. In fact, Rousseau has been called the precursor of the modern pseudo-democrats such as Stalin and Hitler and the "people's democracies." French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror




4. If the modus operandi of the French Revolution was butchery, blood and gore, the goal was one that echoes in contemporary America: dechristianization.

"The West has debated many times before whether Christianity is a friend or foe of society, but perhaps never so dramatically as during the French Revolution. For several years, from about 1790 to 1800, the revolutionary government exiled or executed thousands of Catholic clerics and tried to expunge all traces of France’s Christian past from public life.

Does this dramatic episode hold any lessons for today?" MercatorNet: Dechristianization: Chapter One


The lesson?

The only religion allowed is 'Secularism'....worship of the state.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. Having made the irreparable error of gaining their knowledge of history from 'professors' in those bastions of Liberalism, the universities, far too many millennials believe that the French Revolution was, in any way tantamount, duplicate, analogous to our American Revolution.

It was not.


2. Our revolution produced documents and a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, the beliefs of Classical Liberals, or what we call 'conservatives' today. Its template was the amalgam of Judeo-Christian biblical tradition and Anglo-Saxon Common Law.
It is for this reason that America did not become the abattoir, the slaughter house, that France became.


a. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

b. The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh

Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.” Coulter




3. The truth about the French Revolution is strenuously hidden those captives, the university students, because the Liberals in charge wish to hide the fact that it was the precursor of every evil totalitarian regime in modern times.

" If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century. In fact, Rousseau has been called the precursor of the modern pseudo-democrats such as Stalin and Hitler and the "people's democracies." French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror




4. If the modus operandi of the French Revolution was butchery, blood and gore, the goal was one that echoes in contemporary America: dechristianization.

"The West has debated many times before whether Christianity is a friend or foe of society, but perhaps never so dramatically as during the French Revolution. For several years, from about 1790 to 1800, the revolutionary government exiled or executed thousands of Catholic clerics and tried to expunge all traces of France’s Christian past from public life.

Does this dramatic episode hold any lessons for today?" MercatorNet: Dechristianization: Chapter One


The lesson?

The only religion allowed is 'Secularism'....worship of the state.

The horrors of the Industrial Revolution, brought on by capitalist greed, proved that the classical liberals were wrong.

 

[Pete7469]

I think one of the reasons America became such a powerhouse so quickly, is because most of the people who landed here wanted to get away from tyrannical control.

The reason the euroweenies left behind accepted socialism so readily is because they were the sort of dependency minded bed wetters commonly found in the democrook party.

There is no where else for us to go. We must reclaim this continent and make life miserable for parasitic bed wetters. They can take their useless asses back to euroweenie land or some other fascist state where they will be comfortable living as subjects of the state.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Having made the irreparable error of gaining their knowledge of history from 'professors' in those bastions of Liberalism, the universities, far too many millennials believe that the French Revolution was, in any way tantamount, duplicate, analogous to our American Revolution.

It was not.


2. Our revolution produced documents and a nation based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government, the beliefs of Classical Liberals, or what we call 'conservatives' today. Its template was the amalgam of Judeo-Christian biblical tradition and Anglo-Saxon Common Law.
It is for this reason that America did not become the abattoir, the slaughter house, that France became.


a. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

b. The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh

Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.” Coulter




3. The truth about the French Revolution is strenuously hidden those captives, the university students, because the Liberals in charge wish to hide the fact that it was the precursor of every evil totalitarian regime in modern times.

" If the French revolution was the end of monarchy and aristocratic privilege and the emergence of the common man and democratic rights, it was also the beginnings of modern totalitarian government and large-scale executions of "enemies of the People" by impersonal government entities (Robespierre's "Committee of Public Safety"). This legacy would not reach its fullest bloom until the tragic arrival of the German Nazis and Soviet and Chinese communists of the 20th century. In fact, Rousseau has been called the precursor of the modern pseudo-democrats such as Stalin and Hitler and the "people's democracies." French Revolution - Robespierre, and the Legacy of the Reign of Terror




4. If the modus operandi of the French Revolution was butchery, blood and gore, the goal was one that echoes in contemporary America: dechristianization.

"The West has debated many times before whether Christianity is a friend or foe of society, but perhaps never so dramatically as during the French Revolution. For several years, from about 1790 to 1800, the revolutionary government exiled or executed thousands of Catholic clerics and tried to expunge all traces of France’s Christian past from public life.

Does this dramatic episode hold any lessons for today?" MercatorNet: Dechristianization: Chapter One


The lesson?

The only religion allowed is 'Secularism'....worship of the state.

The horrors of the Industrial Revolution, brought on by capitalist greed, proved that the classical liberals were wrong.

Frequently, I call your attempts to change the subject, and deny same....
...but you've taken so many lumps recently....that I'll do you a favor and respond to same...


1. "Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong! Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes.


2. These economic advances continued throughout the period of the rise of socialist ideology. The poor didn’t get poorer because the rich were getting richer (a familiar socialist refrain even today) as the socialists had predicted.

Instead, the underlying reality was that capitalism had created the first societies in history in which living standards were rising in all sectors of society."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.
Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006
https://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2007&month=05



Don't give up....someday you may be correct about something....
.....someday.

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. " When Chou En Lai, the great Chinese Communist, was asked about the significance of the French Revolution, he supposedly replied, “It’s too early to tell.”...
.... the French Revolution defined what we mean by ‘modern’. The revolutionaries intentionally set out to break with the past. Whereas previous campaigners for change tended to justify what they wanted to do on the basis that it was a return to something that existed previously (the wheel of fortune was revolving back, in other words), revolutionaries in France increasingly justified their actions on the basis that they were breaking strongly with the past... ...In the mid-18th century, France was the most Catholic country in Europe. By 1800 the Church was in ruins and religious indifference was widespread." MercatorNet: Dechristianization: Chapter One




6. And here we can see a defining difference between the conservative American Revolution and the Progressive French Revolution: Conservatives believe that custom and tradition result in individuals living in peace. Law is custom and precedent. Liberals are destroyers of custom and convention. To a conservative, change should be gradual, as the new society is often inferior to the old. We build on the ideas and experience of our ancestors. The species is wiser than the individual (Burke).


Liberals are impulsive, and imprudent. They believe in quick changes, and risk new abuses worse than the ‘evils’ that they would sweep away, since remedies are usually not simple. Plato said that prudence is the mark of the statesman. There should be a balance between permanence and change, while liberals see ‘progress’ as some mythical direction for society.



And so it was with the French Revolution.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. ".... revolutionaries also realised the central place that the church had in every day life. All important life-cycle events (births, deaths and marriages) were marked by church ceremonies and the priest was likely to be the most educated person in many French villages. To break the power of the monarchy it was, therefore, vital to attack the power of the church at the same time. Ecclesiastical support was seen as vital to the old order so if, as the revolutionaries did, one wanted to introduce rapid and serious political changes, it was necessary to attack the power of the church. " MercatorNet: Dechristianization: Chapter One



And the same is carried forward by every totalitarian entity....communist, fascist, Nazi, socialist, Liberal, Progressive....

a. " There is no God:
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism." If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses.

When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor." The Schwarz Report | Essays



b. Even in the 19th century, as religious conviction waned, the warnings were there. Ivan Karamazov, in “The Brothers Karamazov,” exclaimed ‘if God does not exist, then everything is permitted.’


And "everything" includes oppression and genocide.
For some regimes that means government use of famine and starvation.
In others, the deprivation of tax benefits and business licenses.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's examine the straight line from the French Revolution to that icon of Liberals....

8. "The rabble, led by the Jacobins proceeded to smash every trace of the past- religion, law, the social order, even the weights and measures system, and even the calendar.

On November 2, 1789, the Assembly declared everything owned by the Catholic Church to be property of the state. Shortly after, the Assembly severed the French Catholic Church’s with the pope, dismissed 50 bishops, dissolved all clerical vows, reorganized the church so that priests were to be elected by popular vote, and required all the clergy to swear an oath of loyalty to the state.


In Lyon, the archbishop refused to swear allegiance to the republic, and was removed, replaced by the revolutionary bishop Antoine Lamourette. But the people of Lyon responded by clinging to their guns and religion. So, the Convention ordered that Lyon, the second-largest city in France, be destroyed and a monument erected on the ashes proclaiming: “Lyon waged war against liberty; Lyon is no more.”
Coulter, "Demonic"



a. Franklin Roosevelt picked right up from that point, selecting KKKer Hugo Black as his first Supreme Court nominee. It was black who fabricated the concept of 'separation of church and state,' the very antithesis of the view of the Founders.

No wonder FDR got along so well with Joseph Stalin.



" During the course of American judicial history, particularly with the landmark decision of Everson v. Board of Education, Jefferson was subtly and erroneously attributed with the remark ‘high and impregnable’ wall. The force behind the misguided interpretation comes from the anti-Catholic former Ku Klux Klan member, Justice Hugo Black: The ‘high and impregnable’ wall central to the past 50 years of church-state jurisprudence is not Jefferson’s wall; rather, it is the wall that Justice Hugo Black built in 1947 in Everson v. Board of Education." The Mythical "Wall of Separation": How a Misused Metaphor Changed Church–State Law, Policy, and Discourse

 

[David_42]

Once I get home to my computer, I will address this thread. I don't take kindly to revisionist dog shit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There is a Bantu proverb, "If you do away with the traditions of the past, then you must first replace them with something of value".....

Now....what is it that the Progressives of France substituted for religion....


9. "The Cult of Reason (French: Culte de la Raison)a was an atheistic belief system established in France and intended as a replacement for Christianity during the French Revolution."
Cult of Reason - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


a. Joseph Fouché, head of the de-Christianization, arranged for the “bankers, scholars, aristocrats, priests, nuns, wealthy merchants, their wives, mistresses and children” to be dragged from their homes and killed by firing squads. He then wrote that Christianity in the provinces “had been struck down once and for all.”



b. "Lamourette had, originally thought that he could fuse revolutionary principles with Catholicism, much like today’s pro-life Democrats, based on a “can’t we all just get along” philosophy. Such gave rise to the idiom “the kiss of Lamourette.” [On July 7th, 1792, the Abbé Lamourette induced the different factions of the Legislative Assembly of France to lay aside their differences; so the deputies of the Royalists, Constitutionalists, Girondists, Jacobins, and Orleanists rushed into each other's arms, and the king was sent for to see “how these Christians loved one another;”but the reconciliation was hollow and unsound. The term is now used for a reconciliation of policy without abatement of rancour. Lamourette's Kiss]

Seems to reflect the definition of 'syncretic'..... Reconciliation or fusion of differing systems of belief,as in philosophy or religion
Google



In lieu of religious holidays, which were banned, the revolutionaries put on “Fetes of Reason.” The first was in November 1793, in the Notre Dame Cathedral, which had been renamed “The Temple of Reason,” with “To Philosophy” carved on the façade and the altar named the “Altar of Reason.” It was an ACLU fantasy come true!
Coulter

 

[francoHFW]

The French Revolution was a true revolution, not a change in tax men lol. Your death figures are bs.

 

[francoHFW]

Most of your arguments against it are actually against the counter revolutions: Robespierre and Napoleon, and are also bs from Anglo-saxon propaganda.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The French Revolution was a true revolution, not a change in tax men lol. Your death figures are bs.

Everything I post is factual.

Actually.....the death toll may be higher.

Let's review.

1. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

Of course you don't recognize Alan Schom....as you have never studied history

a. "Alan M. Schom is an American-born writer and biographer, born in Sterling, Illinois, in 1937. He attended Beverly Hills High School and received an A.B. in European History from University of California, Berkeley, a Ph.D at Durham University (England), School of Oriental Studies. He taught French and Modern European History at Southern Connecticut State University and at the University of California, Riverside. He served as the President and Founder of the French Colonial Historical Society (1974–76), and founded its research journal, French Colonial Studies. He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution in 1984." Alan Schom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


2. One can hardly count only the massacre at the Bastille...or only the 'Terror'...or omit the fact of the wars that resulted from the other European monarchies attempting to put the cork back in the bottle.
Napoleon's wars alone would add some 3.5- 6.5 million deaths.
"The total death toll for the French Revolution is over 1,000,000."
Read more: What is the death toll of the French revolution
What is the death toll of the French revolution - ixzz1ejRVb3k8

You do understand that the provenance of Napoleon was the French Revolution, don't you?

3. "That's in a country with between 24 and 26 million people, about the current population of Texas. In terms of population loss, that would be the equalivalent of the United States having a 9/11 attack every day for seven years."
Coulter, "Demonic," p. 266.


But, of course, revealing you to be an uneducated dunce is like gilding the lily, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Most of your arguments against it are actually against the counter revolutions: Robespierre and Napoleon, and are also bs from Anglo-saxon propaganda.

I don't make 'arguments'....I simply show why I am correct.
As I did in posts directed at you.

I proved
a. That I was more than correct as to the numbers slaughtered by the revolutionaries of the French Revolution....while showing that you know less than nothing.

b. And documented the abject failure of Barack Hussein Obama in the realm of domestic economic policy....while showing that in choosing a candidate to support.....you know less than nothing.

 

[francoHFW]

Actually

The French Revolution was a true revolution, not a change in tax men lol. Your death figures are bs.

Everything I post is factual.

Actually.....the death toll may be higher.

Let's review.

1. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

Of course you don't recognize Alan Schom....as you have never studied history

a. "Alan M. Schom is an American-born writer and biographer, born in Sterling, Illinois, in 1937. He attended Beverly Hills High School and received an A.B. in European History from University of California, Berkeley, a Ph.D at Durham University (England), School of Oriental Studies. He taught French and Modern European History at Southern Connecticut State University and at the University of California, Riverside. He served as the President and Founder of the French Colonial Historical Society (1974–76), and founded its research journal, French Colonial Studies. He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution in 1984." Alan Schom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


2. One can hardly count only the massacre at the Bastille...or only the 'Terror'...or omit the fact of the wars that resulted from the other European monarchies attempting to put the cork back in the bottle.
Napoleon's wars alone would add some 3.5- 6.5 million deaths.
"The total death toll for the French Revolution is over 1,000,000."
Read more: What is the death toll of the French revolution
What is the death toll of the French revolution - ixzz1ejRVb3k8

You do understand that the provenance of Napoleon was the French Revolution, don't you?

3. "That's in a country with between 24 and 26 million people, about the current population of Texas. In terms of population loss, that would be the equalivalent of the United States having a 9/11 attack every day for seven years."
Coulter, "Demonic," p. 266.


But, of course, revealing you to be an uneducated dunce is like gilding the lily, huh?

ACTUALLY, my Masters in History was mainly French Civilization and Hitler. 2400 aristocrats were guillotined. Let's see a breakdown of that 1 million figure- you link seems to be saying much of that figure is about stopping attacks from other monarchies.

The metric system is not a war crime, BTW. lol Nor is Brumaire etc. And Napoleon never said Britain was a nation of shopkeepers. Pure propaganda, like that he was short. He said it was full of damn monopolists. Damn Anglo-American savage capitalist monolingual ugly Anglocentric lying RWers...lol

 

[francoHFW]

Most of your arguments against it are actually against the counter revolutions: Robespierre and Napoleon, and are also bs from Anglo-saxon propaganda.

I don't make 'arguments'....I simply show why I am correct.
As I did in posts directed at you.

I proved
a. That I was more than correct as to the numbers slaughtered by the revolutionaries of the French Revolution....while showing that you know less than nothing.

b. And documented the abject failure of Barack Hussein Obama in the realm of domestic economic policy....while showing that in choosing a candidate to support.....you know less than nothing.

That's an argument duh lol.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Actually

The French Revolution was a true revolution, not a change in tax men lol. Your death figures are bs.

Everything I post is factual.

Actually.....the death toll may be higher.

Let's review.

1. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

Of course you don't recognize Alan Schom....as you have never studied history

a. "Alan M. Schom is an American-born writer and biographer, born in Sterling, Illinois, in 1937. He attended Beverly Hills High School and received an A.B. in European History from University of California, Berkeley, a Ph.D at Durham University (England), School of Oriental Studies. He taught French and Modern European History at Southern Connecticut State University and at the University of California, Riverside. He served as the President and Founder of the French Colonial Historical Society (1974–76), and founded its research journal, French Colonial Studies. He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution in 1984." Alan Schom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


2. One can hardly count only the massacre at the Bastille...or only the 'Terror'...or omit the fact of the wars that resulted from the other European monarchies attempting to put the cork back in the bottle.
Napoleon's wars alone would add some 3.5- 6.5 million deaths.
"The total death toll for the French Revolution is over 1,000,000."
Read more: What is the death toll of the French revolution
What is the death toll of the French revolution - ixzz1ejRVb3k8

You do understand that the provenance of Napoleon was the French Revolution, don't you?

3. "That's in a country with between 24 and 26 million people, about the current population of Texas. In terms of population loss, that would be the equalivalent of the United States having a 9/11 attack every day for seven years."
Coulter, "Demonic," p. 266.


But, of course, revealing you to be an uneducated dunce is like gilding the lily, huh?

ACTUALLY, my Masters in History was mainly French Civilization and Hitler. 2400 aristocrats were guillotined. Let's see a breakdown of that 1 million figure- you link seems to be saying much of that figure is about stopping attacks from other monarchies.

The metric system is not a war crime, BTW. lol Nor is Brumaire etc. And Napoleon never said Britain was a nation of shopkeepers. Pure propaganda, like that he was short. He said it was full of damn monopolists. Damn Anglo-American savage capitalist monolingual ugly Anglocentric lying RWers...lol

"ACTUALLY, my Masters in History was mainly French Civilization and Hitler."

Who do you think you're kidding???

Certainly not anyone who's read your posts.

 

[francoHFW]

Later, Anglocentric monolingual ugly RWer lol. Turns out most of those deaths were in selfdefense from outside royal interests. Are youa closet monarchist? lol Later.

 

[francoHFW]

Actually

The French Revolution was a true revolution, not a change in tax men lol. Your death figures are bs.

Everything I post is factual.

Actually.....the death toll may be higher.

Let's review.

1. In the course of France's short revolution, 600,000 French citizens were killed, and another 145,000 fled the country. Schom, "Napoleon Bonaparte," p. 253.

Of course you don't recognize Alan Schom....as you have never studied history

a. "Alan M. Schom is an American-born writer and biographer, born in Sterling, Illinois, in 1937. He attended Beverly Hills High School and received an A.B. in European History from University of California, Berkeley, a Ph.D at Durham University (England), School of Oriental Studies. He taught French and Modern European History at Southern Connecticut State University and at the University of California, Riverside. He served as the President and Founder of the French Colonial Historical Society (1974–76), and founded its research journal, French Colonial Studies. He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution in 1984." Alan Schom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


2. One can hardly count only the massacre at the Bastille...or only the 'Terror'...or omit the fact of the wars that resulted from the other European monarchies attempting to put the cork back in the bottle.
Napoleon's wars alone would add some 3.5- 6.5 million deaths.
"The total death toll for the French Revolution is over 1,000,000."
Read more: What is the death toll of the French revolution
What is the death toll of the French revolution - ixzz1ejRVb3k8

You do understand that the provenance of Napoleon was the French Revolution, don't you?

3. "That's in a country with between 24 and 26 million people, about the current population of Texas. In terms of population loss, that would be the equalivalent of the United States having a 9/11 attack every day for seven years."
Coulter, "Demonic," p. 266.


But, of course, revealing you to be an uneducated dunce is like gilding the lily, huh?

ACTUALLY, my Masters in History was mainly French Civilization and Hitler. 2400 aristocrats were guillotined. Let's see a breakdown of that 1 million figure- you link seems to be saying much of that figure is about stopping attacks from other monarchies.

The metric system is not a war crime, BTW. lol Nor is Brumaire etc. And Napoleon never said Britain was a nation of shopkeepers. Pure propaganda, like that he was short. He said it was full of damn monopolists. Damn Anglo-American savage capitalist monolingual ugly Anglocentric lying RWers...lol

"ACTUALLY, my Masters in History was mainly French Civilization and Hitler."

Who do you think you're kidding???

Certainly not anyone who's read your posts.

I admire and respect your dumbass dupe opinion. lol LATER.

 

[francoHFW]

What is the death toll of the French revolution

"Cuncator"? Seriously?

 

[boilermaker55]

It is nothing but copy and paste with a few phrases interjected. She has no original thoughts.
Not worth the time.

Once I get home to my computer, I will address this thread. I don't take kindly to revisionist dog shit.