- Thread starter
- #41
6.What is the reason that Liberals believe they can ignore equality,ā¦..is it their pursuit of power?
Sure is.
Thatās why melanin is inordinately important to Liberals.
7.It behooves us to review what the nature of equality entails.
āJustice means choice. The choice must be by recourse and devotion to laws made impartially, without respect to individuals, and applied impartially.
Should we extend our discussion to Justiceā¦.with mitigating factors of oneās childhood, race, or environment?
What weight to extenuationā¦his supposed goodness to animals or to his mother...? Where is consideration for the needs of the citizenry for protection?
No where: if a jury is influenced by emotion, dramatics, flattery, ācompassion,ā then laws, which have been decided based on behaviors and not individuals are cast aside by reference to merit, or fairness, or compassionā¦.all of which are inchoate, subjective and nonquantifiable.
a. It is not the governmentās job to determine merit, rather to provide a set of laws that one may expect to be applied without intervention. Laws, under our Constitution, apply not to classes of people, but to classes of actions.
If āfairnessā is associated with group-identity, with all of the associated accommodations, law will be reduced to constant petition of government for special and specific exemptions from justice. Law, to be just, but be written and carried out in ignorance of the identity of its claimants.
David Mamet, āThe Secret Knowledgeā
The lack of fairness, the dishonesty, of Liberals/Democrats does no service to the education, the nation, or the objects of their impartiality.
Sure is.
Thatās why melanin is inordinately important to Liberals.
7.It behooves us to review what the nature of equality entails.
āJustice means choice. The choice must be by recourse and devotion to laws made impartially, without respect to individuals, and applied impartially.
Should we extend our discussion to Justiceā¦.with mitigating factors of oneās childhood, race, or environment?
What weight to extenuationā¦his supposed goodness to animals or to his mother...? Where is consideration for the needs of the citizenry for protection?
No where: if a jury is influenced by emotion, dramatics, flattery, ācompassion,ā then laws, which have been decided based on behaviors and not individuals are cast aside by reference to merit, or fairness, or compassionā¦.all of which are inchoate, subjective and nonquantifiable.
a. It is not the governmentās job to determine merit, rather to provide a set of laws that one may expect to be applied without intervention. Laws, under our Constitution, apply not to classes of people, but to classes of actions.
If āfairnessā is associated with group-identity, with all of the associated accommodations, law will be reduced to constant petition of government for special and specific exemptions from justice. Law, to be just, but be written and carried out in ignorance of the identity of its claimants.
David Mamet, āThe Secret Knowledgeā
The lack of fairness, the dishonesty, of Liberals/Democrats does no service to the education, the nation, or the objects of their impartiality.