Liberals, anti-science

[Freewill]

The left wing keeps telling us that the those opposed to the idea of putting people out of work over Global Warming are just deniers. The liberals accept the scientific communities unqualified unanimous opinion that GW is real and we can actually do something about it. The liberals accept this on faith alone, ignoring anything or anyone who is in opposition. Even though it is not a unanimous opinion.

The left wing tells us evolution explains the creation of life. Well, they don't really say that but that is exactly what they mean. Because they can't think of anything other than a Creator God and that is just off the table. They do this even though the theory can not explain the creation of life from non-life.

Now they are telling us that if a person "feels" or "identifies" as a woman that makes them a woman. Even though the scientific definition of male and female has been established for a very long long time and that does not change because of "feelings."

Here is a definition of "woman."

wom·an
ˈwo͝omən/noun

1. an adult human female.
   synonyms: lady, girl, female; More
   • a female worker or employee.
   • a wife, girlfriend, or lover.
     "he wondered whether Billy had his woman with him"

And female:

fe·male
ˈfēˌmāl/adjective

1. 1.
   of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes.
   "a herd of female deer."

So clearly when science doesn't support their view they just ignore science. Or worse yet make up new definitions and keep repeating it until even they believe the definition to be real.

Abortion. Science and common sense dictates that the unborn child is nothing less than a human being. Not a clump of cells. Not a tumor. Certainly could be considered a fetus since the definition of fetus is this:

fe·tus
ˈfēdəs/
noun

1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.
   synonyms: embryo, unborn baby/child
   "an ultrasonic photo of the fetus"

So once again the left wing has to invent things to get their way. They use the word fetus as if it doesn't mean what it means. They think it depersonalizes the unborn child, but it only does in their minds.

Marriage. Evolution supports that marriage is between a man, male, and woman, female. Evolution works no other way. Mating between two males would produce no offspring. Thus, gay mating is anti-evolution. So what does the liberal do, and the SCOTUS? They change the definition, they change law. without one ounce of caring, what is the will of the people or what science tells them.

Yeah, I know, a bunch fo rambling babble but I hope you get my point.

 

[turzovka]

The left wing keeps telling us that the those opposed to the idea of putting people out of work over Global Warming are just deniers. The liberals accept the scientific communities unqualified unanimous opinion that GW is real and we can actually do something about it. The liberals accept this on faith alone, ignoring anything or anyone who is in opposition. Even though it is not a unanimous opinion.

The left wing tells us evolution explains the creation of life. Well, they don't really say that but that is exactly what they mean. Because they can't think of anything other than a Creator God and that is just off the table. They do this even though the theory can not explain the creation of life from non-life.

Now they are telling us that if a person "feels" or "identifies" as a woman that makes them a woman. Even though the scientific definition of male and female has been established for a very long long time and that does not change because of "feelings."

Here is a definition of "woman."

wom·an
ˈwo͝omən/noun

1. an adult human female.
   synonyms: lady, girl, female; More
   • a female worker or employee.
   • a wife, girlfriend, or lover.
     "he wondered whether Billy had his woman with him"

And female:

fe·male
ˈfēˌmāl/adjective

1. 1.
   of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes.
   "a herd of female deer."

So clearly when science doesn't support their view they just ignore science. Or worse yet make up new definitions and keep repeating it until even they believe the definition to be real.

Abortion. Science and common sense dictates that the unborn child is nothing less than a human being. Not a clump of cells. Not a tumor. Certainly could be considered a fetus since the definition of fetus is this:

fe·tus
ˈfēdəs/
noun

1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.
   synonyms: embryo, unborn baby/child
   "an ultrasonic photo of the fetus"

So once again the left wing has to invent things to get their way. They use the word fetus as if it doesn't mean what it means. They think it depersonalizes the unborn child, but it only does in their minds.

Marriage. Evolution supports that marriage is between a man, male, and woman, female. Evolution works no other way. Mating between two males would produce no offspring. Thus, gay mating is anti-evolution. So what does the liberal do, and the SCOTUS? They change the definition, they change law. without one ounce of caring, what is the will of the people or what science tells them.

Yeah, I know, a bunch fo rambling babble but I hope you get my point.

The origin and evolution of life, alone, is enough to render atheism untenable.

But until one acknowledges a creator it should come as no surprise what other "ideals" they promote as so important or "truthful."

 

[jon_berzerk]

although they dnt admit it

libtards run mostly on faith based libtardisms

 

[DGS49]

There is no actual "thought" on the Left. It is all about doing things that make "us" feel good or superior about ourselves. Whether our initiatives actually do any good is a secondary matter, and not really important.

The Right makes cogent arguments, and the left uses slander, even making up nonsense words (e.g., "homophobe") when nothing suitable is available.

The Left: Let's raise the minimum wage in order to reduce or eliminate poverty!

The Right: It is an economic fact that when wages are raised above the economic value of the work, jobs will be lost and hours will be cut. And the people you claim to be trying to help will be hurt most of all.

The Left: You are EVIL! You hate POOR PEOPLE! You are a GREEDY CAPITALIST!

And so it goes. The same dialog could be produced w/r/t "global warming," "freedom of choice," gay marriage, false gender identification, and so on. The only relevant question is, "Does this initiative make me feel good about myself?"

 

[Freewill]

The left wing keeps telling us that the those opposed to the idea of putting people out of work over Global Warming are just deniers. The liberals accept the scientific communities unqualified unanimous opinion that GW is real and we can actually do something about it. The liberals accept this on faith alone, ignoring anything or anyone who is in opposition. Even though it is not a unanimous opinion.

The left wing tells us evolution explains the creation of life. Well, they don't really say that but that is exactly what they mean. Because they can't think of anything other than a Creator God and that is just off the table. They do this even though the theory can not explain the creation of life from non-life.

Now they are telling us that if a person "feels" or "identifies" as a woman that makes them a woman. Even though the scientific definition of male and female has been established for a very long long time and that does not change because of "feelings."

Here is a definition of "woman."

wom·an
ˈwo͝omən/noun

1. an adult human female.
   synonyms: lady, girl, female; More
   • a female worker or employee.
   • a wife, girlfriend, or lover.
     "he wondered whether Billy had his woman with him"

And female:

fe·male
ˈfēˌmāl/adjective

1. 1.
   of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes.
   "a herd of female deer."

So clearly when science doesn't support their view they just ignore science. Or worse yet make up new definitions and keep repeating it until even they believe the definition to be real.

Abortion. Science and common sense dictates that the unborn child is nothing less than a human being. Not a clump of cells. Not a tumor. Certainly could be considered a fetus since the definition of fetus is this:

fe·tus
ˈfēdəs/
noun

1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.
   synonyms: embryo, unborn baby/child
   "an ultrasonic photo of the fetus"

So once again the left wing has to invent things to get their way. They use the word fetus as if it doesn't mean what it means. They think it depersonalizes the unborn child, but it only does in their minds.

Marriage. Evolution supports that marriage is between a man, male, and woman, female. Evolution works no other way. Mating between two males would produce no offspring. Thus, gay mating is anti-evolution. So what does the liberal do, and the SCOTUS? They change the definition, they change law. without one ounce of caring, what is the will of the people or what science tells them.

Yeah, I know, a bunch fo rambling babble but I hope you get my point.

The origin and evolution of life, alone, is enough to render atheism untenable.

But until one acknowledges a creator it should come as no surprise what other "ideals" they promote as so important or "truthful."

You have stated the truth about the reason the left wing is so desparte to find an alternative explanation to the origin of life.

 

[DGS49]

This is also the reason why we keep seeing breathless announcements by NASA, claiming that there are gazillions of planets which could potentially support life. This is utter nonsense, but it gives NASA a possible REASON TO EXIST(!), and it furthers the narrative of the Lefties that earth is nothing special, and humans are nothing special - in fact, we are an invasive species on this planet.

 

[mamooth]

There's a reason that almost all of the "I'M SO BUTTHURT!" threads, like this one, are started by conservatives.

Those who can rationally talk about a topic, they do that.

Many conservatives can't. But they can babble random butthurt nonsense, so they that instead.