Liberals Reach New Low: 'Texans DESERVE Harvey Disaster Because They Voted For Trump'

[sealybobo]

Texas does not deserve Harvey because they voted for Trump

However, every natural disaster from here on........Hey....you guys voted in favor of global warming

Great point. Keep denying GW as you swim from your home ya god damn rwnj'ers.

Oh by the way, do we need to worry about swimming in 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, or 1000 years? Al Jazeera Gore predicted 10 years back in 2006, guess what, it is 2017, 1 year after we are all supposed to all be swimming. So, give us a date, time and event. Would ya?

“Well we have seen a decline in emissions on a global basis. For the first time they’ve stabilized and started to decline. So some of the responses for the last 10 years have helped, but unfortunately and regrettably a lot of serious damage has been done.”

He then pointed to Greenland and Miami as examples.

“Greenland, for example, has been losing one cubic kilometer of ice every single day. I went down to Miami and saw fish from the ocean swimming in the streets on a sunny day. The same thing was true in Honolulu just two days ago, just from high tides because of the sea level rise now,” he added.

And let me ask you why your position on global warming has changed? It went from a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese to real according to Rex and Nikki Haley. Two people I respect a lot more than I do Trump.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What's funny here is seeing all the RW trolls not getting it, not getting that the 'liberal' in the OP was trolling THEM.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Texas does not deserve Harvey because they voted for Trump

However, every natural disaster from here on........Hey....you guys voted in favor of global warming

Great point. Keep denying GW as you swim from your home ya god damn rwnj'ers.

Oh by the way, do we need to worry about swimming in 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, or 1000 years? Al Jazeera Gore predicted 10 years back in 2006, guess what, it is 2017, 1 year after we are all supposed to all be swimming. So, give us a date, time and event. Would ya?

“Well we have seen a decline in emissions on a global basis. For the first time they’ve stabilized and started to decline. So some of the responses for the last 10 years have helped, but unfortunately and regrettably a lot of serious damage has been done.”

He then pointed to Greenland and Miami as examples.

“Greenland, for example, has been losing one cubic kilometer of ice every single day. I went down to Miami and saw fish from the ocean swimming in the streets on a sunny day. The same thing was true in Honolulu just two days ago, just from high tides because of the sea level rise now,” he added.

And let me ask you why your position on global warming has changed? It went from a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese to real according to Rex and Nikki Haley. Two people I respect a lot more than I do Trump.

Greenland Ice Mass Increases To Near Record – Arctic Ice Reaches Normal Range

The vast majority area of Greenland has seen surface snow and ice gain over the past 9 months. Moreover, Arctic temperatures for now are below normal.

Al Gore caught LYING about fish swimming in streets of Miami – [VIDEO]

A meteorologist with the NWS expounded on this, saying that it’s not just caused by the moon, but also because strong easterly winds pushing high tides on shore:

I have 1 question for you libfucks, do you ever use that grey matter that sits upon your shoulders, or are you spoon fed the talking points of the left and spew it like a good little Eichmann?

 

[sealybobo]

Texas does not deserve Harvey because they voted for Trump

However, every natural disaster from here on........Hey....you guys voted in favor of global warming

Great point. Keep denying GW as you swim from your home ya god damn rwnj'ers.

Oh by the way, do we need to worry about swimming in 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, or 1000 years? Al Jazeera Gore predicted 10 years back in 2006, guess what, it is 2017, 1 year after we are all supposed to all be swimming. So, give us a date, time and event. Would ya?

“Well we have seen a decline in emissions on a global basis. For the first time they’ve stabilized and started to decline. So some of the responses for the last 10 years have helped, but unfortunately and regrettably a lot of serious damage has been done.”

He then pointed to Greenland and Miami as examples.

“Greenland, for example, has been losing one cubic kilometer of ice every single day. I went down to Miami and saw fish from the ocean swimming in the streets on a sunny day. The same thing was true in Honolulu just two days ago, just from high tides because of the sea level rise now,” he added.

And let me ask you why your position on global warming has changed? It went from a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese to real according to Rex and Nikki Haley. Two people I respect a lot more than I do Trump.

Greenland Ice Mass Increases To Near Record – Arctic Ice Reaches Normal Range

The vast majority area of Greenland has seen surface snow and ice gain over the past 9 months. Moreover, Arctic temperatures for now are below normal.

Al Gore caught LYING about fish swimming in streets of Miami – [VIDEO]

A meteorologist with the NWS expounded on this, saying that it’s not just caused by the moon, but also because strong easterly winds pushing high tides on shore:

I have 1 question for you libfucks, do you ever use that grey matter that sits upon your shoulders, or are you spoon fed the talking points of the left and spew it like a good little Eichmann?

I'm sorry liar

"There were fish swimming in the street," John Morgan, a Delray Beach city official, told the Sun-Sentinel in October 2014 after a few inches of sea water accumulated without any rain.

Morgan told PolitiFact that he has seen fish on Marine Way, a road in a low-lying area, as well as at Veterans Park.

"I have been with the city a couple years now, and I’ve probably seen the fish in the streets at least a half dozen times," said Morgan, who now heads up his city’s environmental department.

A Hollywood resident, Robin Rorapaugh, told the Miami Herald’s Public Insight Network in October 2015 that king tides had grown in her neighborhood and that "anyone who doubts climate change should witness the sea come through the storm drains — fish were swimming in the street."

We also found video evidence that supported Obama’s point. A Sept. 28 TV news report featured video showing a fish swimming on Cordova Road in Fort Lauderdale.

"Look at that," a bystander said. "A mullet in the street."

Apology accepted

Do fish swim in the streets of Miami as Barack Obama said?

"I absolutely saw the fish," Carpenter told PolitiFact. "You can actually see the fish swimming out of the creek, past the mangrove trees that are there and into the street. I probably saw close to a dozen. They weren’t big fish, but I don’t know, two or three inches long?"

This isn't like when Trump accused Muslim Americans of dancing in the streets after 9-11

 

[BlindBoo]

^^^ moron actually thinks we haven't had a major hurricane in about a decade. Following is a list of hurricanes over the last 10 hurricane seasons so devastating, their names were retired. Asterisks denote they hit the U.S.

Dean
Felix
Noel *
Gustav *
Ike *
Paloma
Igor
Tomas
Irene *
Sandy *
Ingrid
Erika
Joaquin
Matthew *
Otto

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/E23.html

List of Hurricanes in the last 10 years that have hit the US

2007 – Humberto – Cat 1

2008 – Dolly – Cat 1

2008 – Gustav – Cat 2

2008 – Ike – Cat 2

2011 – Irene – Cat 1

2012 – Isaac – Cat 1

2012 – Sandy – Cat 1

2014 – Arthur – Cat 2

2016 – Hermine – Cat 1

2016 – Matthew – Cat 2

2017 – Harvey – Cat 4

So? I already proved Flash is a moron with a similar list.

You stupid Moon Bats were claiming after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane season that because of this silly ass global warming bullshit that we were going to be having mega storms that the will destroy the world or something.

Like everything else you were wrong. None of the seasonal storm that you listed go above a Cat 2. Where are the mega storms Moon Bat?

I am sorry to be the one that tells you this Moon Bat but none of the silly doomsday predictions you stupid Moon Bats have ever made about AGW have ever come true.

You need to come up with another scam to further your world socialism agenda because this AGW bullshit is considered a joke. Even the scientists that take the grant money know it is a joke.

Two frequently asked questions on global warming and hurricanes are the following:

• Have humans already caused a detectable increase in Atlantic hurricane activity or global tropical cyclone activity?
• What changes in hurricane activity are expected for the late 21st century, given the pronounced global warming scenarios from current IPCC models?

In this review, we address these questions in the context of published research findings. We will first present the main conclusions and then follow with some background discussion of the research that leads to these conclusions. The main conclusions are:

• It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.
• There are better than even odds that anthropogenic warming over the next century will lead to an increase in the occurrence of very intense tropical cyclone in some basins–an increase that would be substantially larger in percentage terms than the 2-11% increase in the average storm intensity. This increase in intense storm occurrence is projected despite a likely decrease (or little change) in the global numbers of all tropical cyclones.
• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones to have substantially higher rainfall rates than present-day ones, with a model-projected increase of about 10-15% for rainfall rates averaged within about 100 km of the storm center.

They're talking next centruy.

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

 

[BlindBoo]

The professor was fired what more do you want. He worked for the University of Tampa. Florida takes hurricanes seriously.

They may take hurricanes seriously, but this asshole obviously did not take human lives and suffering seriously in his callous partisan hatred-focused comment.

Bull shit. It was an evil paraphrasing of his pathetic, partisan, non-empathetic tweet what got everybody's panties in a tight wad.

It's those kind of false narratives that makes the GOP what it is today.

 

[Flash]

^^^ moron actually thinks we haven't had a major hurricane in about a decade. Following is a list of hurricanes over the last 10 hurricane seasons so devastating, their names were retired. Asterisks denote they hit the U.S.

Dean
Felix
Noel *
Gustav *
Ike *
Paloma
Igor
Tomas
Irene *
Sandy *
Ingrid
Erika
Joaquin
Matthew *
Otto

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/E23.html

List of Hurricanes in the last 10 years that have hit the US

2007 – Humberto – Cat 1

2008 – Dolly – Cat 1

2008 – Gustav – Cat 2

2008 – Ike – Cat 2

2011 – Irene – Cat 1

2012 – Isaac – Cat 1

2012 – Sandy – Cat 1

2014 – Arthur – Cat 2

2016 – Hermine – Cat 1

2016 – Matthew – Cat 2

2017 – Harvey – Cat 4

So? I already proved Flash is a moron with a similar list.

You stupid Moon Bats were claiming after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane season that because of this silly ass global warming bullshit that we were going to be having mega storms that the will destroy the world or something.

Like everything else you were wrong. None of the seasonal storm that you listed go above a Cat 2. Where are the mega storms Moon Bat?

I am sorry to be the one that tells you this Moon Bat but none of the silly doomsday predictions you stupid Moon Bats have ever made about AGW have ever come true.

You need to come up with another scam to further your world socialism agenda because this AGW bullshit is considered a joke. Even the scientists that take the grant money know it is a joke.

Two frequently asked questions on global warming and hurricanes are the following:

• Have humans already caused a detectable increase in Atlantic hurricane activity or global tropical cyclone activity?
• What changes in hurricane activity are expected for the late 21st century, given the pronounced global warming scenarios from current IPCC models?

In this review, we address these questions in the context of published research findings. We will first present the main conclusions and then follow with some background discussion of the research that leads to these conclusions. The main conclusions are:

• It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.
• There are better than even odds that anthropogenic warming over the next century will lead to an increase in the occurrence of very intense tropical cyclone in some basins–an increase that would be substantially larger in percentage terms than the 2-11% increase in the average storm intensity. This increase in intense storm occurrence is projected despite a likely decrease (or little change) in the global numbers of all tropical cyclones.
• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones to have substantially higher rainfall rates than present-day ones, with a model-projected increase of about 10-15% for rainfall rates averaged within about 100 km of the storm center.

They're talking next centruy.

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

I am always amazed about the stupidity of the Moon Bats that post on here. They are uneducated and low information. I suspect it comes from getting their information from Comedy Central, Saturday Night Live and Rachael Maddow.

The source of that stupidity you posted is NOAA. Under the filthy ass Obama Administration both NOAA and NASA were corrupted to produce false environmental wacko bullshit.

The souce of a lot of theis AGW bullshit comes from NOAA data which hads been corrupted. I guess if you tell a lie enough times then everybody will claim it is a fact.

NASA / NOAA Climate Data Is Fake Data | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

NASA / NOAA Climate Data Is Fake Data
Posted on February 4, 2017 by tonyheller
NOAA shows the Earth red hot in December, with record heat in central Africa.

The map above is fake. NOAA has almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures.


Gavin Schmidt at NASA claims the imaginary NOAA data has been replicated by many other institutions.

 

[rightwinger]

^^^ moron actually thinks we haven't had a major hurricane in about a decade. Following is a list of hurricanes over the last 10 hurricane seasons so devastating, their names were retired. Asterisks denote they hit the U.S.

Dean
Felix
Noel *
Gustav *
Ike *
Paloma
Igor
Tomas
Irene *
Sandy *
Ingrid
Erika
Joaquin
Matthew *
Otto

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/E23.html

List of Hurricanes in the last 10 years that have hit the US

2007 – Humberto – Cat 1

2008 – Dolly – Cat 1

2008 – Gustav – Cat 2

2008 – Ike – Cat 2

2011 – Irene – Cat 1

2012 – Isaac – Cat 1

2012 – Sandy – Cat 1

2014 – Arthur – Cat 2

2016 – Hermine – Cat 1

2016 – Matthew – Cat 2

2017 – Harvey – Cat 4

So? I already proved Flash is a moron with a similar list.

You stupid Moon Bats were claiming after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane season that because of this silly ass global warming bullshit that we were going to be having mega storms that the will destroy the world or something.

Like everything else you were wrong. None of the seasonal storm that you listed go above a Cat 2. Where are the mega storms Moon Bat?

I am sorry to be the one that tells you this Moon Bat but none of the silly doomsday predictions you stupid Moon Bats have ever made about AGW have ever come true.

You need to come up with another scam to further your world socialism agenda because this AGW bullshit is considered a joke. Even the scientists that take the grant money know it is a joke.

Two frequently asked questions on global warming and hurricanes are the following:

• Have humans already caused a detectable increase in Atlantic hurricane activity or global tropical cyclone activity?
• What changes in hurricane activity are expected for the late 21st century, given the pronounced global warming scenarios from current IPCC models?

In this review, we address these questions in the context of published research findings. We will first present the main conclusions and then follow with some background discussion of the research that leads to these conclusions. The main conclusions are:

• It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.
• There are better than even odds that anthropogenic warming over the next century will lead to an increase in the occurrence of very intense tropical cyclone in some basins–an increase that would be substantially larger in percentage terms than the 2-11% increase in the average storm intensity. This increase in intense storm occurrence is projected despite a likely decrease (or little change) in the global numbers of all tropical cyclones.
• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones to have substantially higher rainfall rates than present-day ones, with a model-projected increase of about 10-15% for rainfall rates averaged within about 100 km of the storm center.

They're talking next centruy.

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

Next century......I'll be dead

Drill baby.....Drill

 

[BlindBoo]

^^^ moron actually thinks we haven't had a major hurricane in about a decade. Following is a list of hurricanes over the last 10 hurricane seasons so devastating, their names were retired. Asterisks denote they hit the U.S.

Dean
Felix
Noel *
Gustav *
Ike *
Paloma
Igor
Tomas
Irene *
Sandy *
Ingrid
Erika
Joaquin
Matthew *
Otto

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/E23.html

List of Hurricanes in the last 10 years that have hit the US

2007 – Humberto – Cat 1

2008 – Dolly – Cat 1

2008 – Gustav – Cat 2

2008 – Ike – Cat 2

2011 – Irene – Cat 1

2012 – Isaac – Cat 1

2012 – Sandy – Cat 1

2014 – Arthur – Cat 2

2016 – Hermine – Cat 1

2016 – Matthew – Cat 2

2017 – Harvey – Cat 4

So? I already proved Flash is a moron with a similar list.

You stupid Moon Bats were claiming after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane season that because of this silly ass global warming bullshit that we were going to be having mega storms that the will destroy the world or something.

Like everything else you were wrong. None of the seasonal storm that you listed go above a Cat 2. Where are the mega storms Moon Bat?

I am sorry to be the one that tells you this Moon Bat but none of the silly doomsday predictions you stupid Moon Bats have ever made about AGW have ever come true.

You need to come up with another scam to further your world socialism agenda because this AGW bullshit is considered a joke. Even the scientists that take the grant money know it is a joke.

Two frequently asked questions on global warming and hurricanes are the following:

• Have humans already caused a detectable increase in Atlantic hurricane activity or global tropical cyclone activity?
• What changes in hurricane activity are expected for the late 21st century, given the pronounced global warming scenarios from current IPCC models?

In this review, we address these questions in the context of published research findings. We will first present the main conclusions and then follow with some background discussion of the research that leads to these conclusions. The main conclusions are:

• It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.
• There are better than even odds that anthropogenic warming over the next century will lead to an increase in the occurrence of very intense tropical cyclone in some basins–an increase that would be substantially larger in percentage terms than the 2-11% increase in the average storm intensity. This increase in intense storm occurrence is projected despite a likely decrease (or little change) in the global numbers of all tropical cyclones.
• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones to have substantially higher rainfall rates than present-day ones, with a model-projected increase of about 10-15% for rainfall rates averaged within about 100 km of the storm center.

They're talking next centruy.

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

I am always amazed about the stupidity of the Moon Bats that post on here. They are uneducated and low information. I suspect it comes from getting their information from Comedy Central, Saturday Night Live and Rachael Maddow.

The source of that stupidity you posted is NOAA. Under the filthy ass Obama Administration both NOAA and NASA were corrupted to produce false environmental wacko bullshit.

The souce of a lot of theis AGW bullshit comes from NOAA data which hads been corrupted. I guess if you tell a lie enough times then everybody will claim it is a fact.

NASA / NOAA Climate Data Is Fake Data | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

NASA / NOAA Climate Data Is Fake Data
Posted on February 4, 2017 by tonyheller
NOAA shows the Earth red hot in December, with record heat in central Africa.

The map above is fake. NOAA has almost no temperature data from Africa, and none from central Africa. They simply made up the record temperatures.


Gavin Schmidt at NASA claims the imaginary NOAA data has been replicated by many other institutions.


View attachment 146729

So then you disagree with: "In summary, neither our model projections for the 21st century nor our analyses of trends in Atlantic hurricane and tropical storm counts over the past 120+ yr support the notion that greenhouse gas-induced warming leads to large increases in either tropical storm or overall hurricane numbers in the Atlantic."

And with: "In terms of historical tropical cyclone activity, a 2010 WMO assessment of tropical cyclones and climate change concluded that “it remains uncertain whether past changes in tropical cyclone activity have exceeded the variability expected from natural causes.” This conclusion applied to all basins around the globe."

Because you know, truthiness!

 

[BlindBoo]

^^^ moron actually thinks we haven't had a major hurricane in about a decade. Following is a list of hurricanes over the last 10 hurricane seasons so devastating, their names were retired. Asterisks denote they hit the U.S.

Dean
Felix
Noel *
Gustav *
Ike *
Paloma
Igor
Tomas
Irene *
Sandy *
Ingrid
Erika
Joaquin
Matthew *
Otto

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/E23.html

List of Hurricanes in the last 10 years that have hit the US

2007 – Humberto – Cat 1

2008 – Dolly – Cat 1

2008 – Gustav – Cat 2

2008 – Ike – Cat 2

2011 – Irene – Cat 1

2012 – Isaac – Cat 1

2012 – Sandy – Cat 1

2014 – Arthur – Cat 2

2016 – Hermine – Cat 1

2016 – Matthew – Cat 2

2017 – Harvey – Cat 4

So? I already proved Flash is a moron with a similar list.

You stupid Moon Bats were claiming after the 2004 and 2005 hurricane season that because of this silly ass global warming bullshit that we were going to be having mega storms that the will destroy the world or something.

Like everything else you were wrong. None of the seasonal storm that you listed go above a Cat 2. Where are the mega storms Moon Bat?

I am sorry to be the one that tells you this Moon Bat but none of the silly doomsday predictions you stupid Moon Bats have ever made about AGW have ever come true.

You need to come up with another scam to further your world socialism agenda because this AGW bullshit is considered a joke. Even the scientists that take the grant money know it is a joke.

Two frequently asked questions on global warming and hurricanes are the following:

• Have humans already caused a detectable increase in Atlantic hurricane activity or global tropical cyclone activity?
• What changes in hurricane activity are expected for the late 21st century, given the pronounced global warming scenarios from current IPCC models?

In this review, we address these questions in the context of published research findings. We will first present the main conclusions and then follow with some background discussion of the research that leads to these conclusions. The main conclusions are:

• It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.
• There are better than even odds that anthropogenic warming over the next century will lead to an increase in the occurrence of very intense tropical cyclone in some basins–an increase that would be substantially larger in percentage terms than the 2-11% increase in the average storm intensity. This increase in intense storm occurrence is projected despite a likely decrease (or little change) in the global numbers of all tropical cyclones.
• Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones to have substantially higher rainfall rates than present-day ones, with a model-projected increase of about 10-15% for rainfall rates averaged within about 100 km of the storm center.

They're talking next centruy.

Global Warming and Hurricanes – Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

Next century......I'll be dead

Drill baby.....Drill

Dat's right. We beat that Ice Age in the 70's and we'll do it again.......

 

[OldLady]

This douche-bag just remind people how hate-filled/driven, eternally triggered, bat-shit crazy, butt-hurt snowflakes are.

According to religious nuts, God's anger has been the cause of lots of hurricanes, earthquakes, and all kinds of other natural disasters. Why should this one be any different? Texas politics has finally reached the point where God is fed up with the right wing hate.

They got the idea from Noah's Ark.

 

[Tilly]

Professor: Texans 'Deserve' Harvey Because They Voted For Trump

"A sociology professor at the University of Tampa published a tweet on Sunday afternoon suggesting that Texas residents deserve the death, destruction and suffering caused by Hurricane Harvey because a majority of Texas voters supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election."

What a piece of fecal matter.....

when I wished Texas well in Announcements on Saturday, Zander--who is one of yours, I believe--said:
I am a realist that has no tolerance for the pretend world of the online leftists...
Don't start a fucking thread that says "hang in there". That's just lame!
No. It's lame. Sorta like telling people in texas to "hang in there".
Telling people to "hang in there" is not supportive or kind or clever. It's lame as fuck. Even if you think you mean it......

So don't you start whining about what the LEFT says.

Well it was kinda lame, saying 'keep safe and keep dry'! What the hell do you think they're doing?
And why post it in 'Announcements & Feedback'?
Seemed very much like OTT virtue signalling
If it wasn't, there's no need to get your knickers in such a twist

 

[OldLady]

Professor: Texans 'Deserve' Harvey Because They Voted For Trump

"A sociology professor at the University of Tampa published a tweet on Sunday afternoon suggesting that Texas residents deserve the death, destruction and suffering caused by Hurricane Harvey because a majority of Texas voters supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election."

What a piece of fecal matter.....

when I wished Texas well in Announcements on Saturday, Zander--who is one of yours, I believe--said:
I am a realist that has no tolerance for the pretend world of the online leftists...
Don't start a fucking thread that says "hang in there". That's just lame!
No. It's lame. Sorta like telling people in texas to "hang in there".
Telling people to "hang in there" is not supportive or kind or clever. It's lame as fuck. Even if you think you mean it......

So don't you start whining about what the LEFT says.

Well it was kinda lame, saying 'keep safe and keep dry'! What the hell do you think they're doing?
And why post it in 'Announcements & Feedback'?
Seemed very much like OTT virtue signalling
If it wasn't, there's no need to get your knickers in such a twist

Coming from you, this is not unexpected, Tilly.
This is my first major natural disaster on the internet and it's disgusting the lengths people will go to in order to be miserable to each other. I'm disappointed in a lot of people who agreed with him, too.

 

[flacaltenn]

When all but one Texas Republican voted no during Sandy, what fucking possible reason could you give me for helping their constituents.

Did those bastards get voted out of office? Nope. Texans didn't care much that their politicians voted no to helping victims of Sandy. So the citizens are little eichmans. Look it up.

As always, the Progressives here twist the truth to fit their agenda. The FACT of the matter is that the "Financial Aid" bill was LOADED WITH PORK, items totally unrelated to Sandy.

Well lets look at the 'Facts'

Analysis | Ted Cruz’s claim that two-thirds of the Hurricane Sandy bill ‘had nothing to do with Sandy’

“The problem with that particular bill is it became a $50 billion bill that was filled with unrelated pork. Two-thirds of that bill had nothing to do with Sandy.”
— Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), interview with NBC’s Katy Tur, Aug. 28, 2017

The Congressional Research Service issued a comprehensive report on the provisions, and it’s clear that virtually all of it was related to the damage caused by Sandy. There may have been some pork in an earlier Senate version, but many of those items were removed before final passage. There were also some items that appear to have been misunderstood.

Ryan, for instance, referred in a statement to “non-Sandy expenses,” such as “sand dunes at the Kennedy Space Center, highway repairs in the Virgin Islands, and roof repairs in Washington, D.C.” But Sandy was a storm that stretched far beyond New Jersey and New York as it raced up from the Caribbean.

The Smithsonian Institution suffered roof leaks from heavy winds and torrential rain, resulting in a $2 million request. The shoreline near Launch Pads 39A and B at the Kennedy Space Center also suffered major erosion, leaving the ocean less than a quarter-mile away, so $15 million was added to deal with that problem and repair a NASA facility on Wallops Island in Virginia that also was damaged by Sandy. We couldn’t find a line-item for Virgin Islands highway funding, so it appears to have been relatively minor.

The bill did wrap in some other 2012 disaster funding, including disasters that had been declared over Alaska Chinook salmon, New England groundfish, Mississippi fisheries and American Samoa bottomfish. Those are the fisheries that the Cornyn spokesman referenced — but they were disaster declarations. So one would think it would make sense to include relief in a disaster bill.

Some lawmakers complained about $100 million in funding for Head Start, but that was limited to facilities that had been damaged in New Jersey and New York.

This being Congress, one of course can find some eyebrow-raising provisions. In particular, there was $16 billion for the account that funds Community Development Block Grants, which were aimed at Sandy relief but also could be used for eligible disaster events in calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013. So the main focus was Sandy, but the money could be moved to assist other disaster relief efforts over a three-year period.

Still, it’s all related to disaster relief.

The bill also included tribal and state clean water and pollution mitigation grants ($600 million), funds to improve weather forecasting ($25 million), and upgrades to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration aircraft ($44.5 million). Those provisions were intended to prevent future disasters but arguably were not related to Sandy. But that’s less than 2 percent of the total.

You don't follow along too well... Probably because you RELY on "fact-checkers" rather than doing any research.

Congress LIES all the time. Because they Purposely confuse bills that "evolve" thru several votes and committees. Originally proposed by OBAMA as $69Bill worth of MOSTLY pork..

http://nypost.com/2012/12/15/obama-...th-holiday-goodies-unrelated-to-storm-damage/

WASHINGTON — President Obama’s $60.4 billion request for Hurricane Sandy relief has morphed into a huge Christmas stocking of goodies for federal agencies and even the state of Alaska, The Post has learned.

The pork-barrel feast includes more than $8 million to buy cars and equipment for the Homeland Security and Justice departments. It also includes a whopping $150 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to dole out to fisheries in Alaska and $2 million for the Smithsonian Institution to repair museum roofs in DC.

An eye-popping $13 billion would go to “mitigation” projects to prepare for future storms.

Other big-ticket items in the bill include $207 million for the VA Manhattan Medical Center; $41 million to fix up eight military bases along the storm’s path, including Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; $4 million for repairs at Kennedy Space Center in Florida; $3.3 million for the Plum Island Animal Disease Center and $1.1 million to repair national cemeteries.

Budget watchdogs have dubbed the 94-page emergency-spending bill “Sandy Scam.”

THANKS to Repub opposition like Ted Cruz and others --- this then got pared down to about a $12Bill bill which STILL INCLUDED projects unrelated to Sandy. And FINALLY ended up as a "Sandy Only" bill to FINALLY get the relief money. MONTHS of time expired to fix this. And the snapping poodles on both sides of your tribal conflict can find ANYTHING THEY WANT to quote as fact to keep fighting over this. Including those biased, partisan, shit-headed "fact-checkers" of yours. They just SELECTIVELY QUOTE and do shady "condensing" of the time line and events.

Fact is -- that relief for Sandy WAS delayed months because Obama and Dems used it as an opportunity to load up the 2nd Stimulus bill that they never got...

More from the Obama proposed "Sandy" bill..


$10.78 billion for public transportation, most of which is allocated to future construction and improvements, not disaster relief.
$17 billion for wasteful Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), a program that has become notorious for its use as a backdoor earmark program.



Your "fact checkers" make all dolts look like the kid cheating off his neighbor during a test.. MAJORITY of the original proposed funding was NOT Sandy relief.. It got whittled from $60Bill to $9.7Bill -- So your deceitful fact-checkers just ignored the "facts" to make you look stupid...

 

[NYcarbineer]

When all but one Texas Republican voted no during Sandy, what fucking possible reason could you give me for helping their constituents.

Did those bastards get voted out of office? Nope. Texans didn't care much that their politicians voted no to helping victims of Sandy. So the citizens are little eichmans. Look it up.

As always, the Progressives here twist the truth to fit their agenda. The FACT of the matter is that the "Financial Aid" bill was LOADED WITH PORK, items totally unrelated to Sandy.

Well lets look at the 'Facts'

Analysis | Ted Cruz’s claim that two-thirds of the Hurricane Sandy bill ‘had nothing to do with Sandy’

“The problem with that particular bill is it became a $50 billion bill that was filled with unrelated pork. Two-thirds of that bill had nothing to do with Sandy.”
— Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), interview with NBC’s Katy Tur, Aug. 28, 2017

The Congressional Research Service issued a comprehensive report on the provisions, and it’s clear that virtually all of it was related to the damage caused by Sandy. There may have been some pork in an earlier Senate version, but many of those items were removed before final passage. There were also some items that appear to have been misunderstood.

Ryan, for instance, referred in a statement to “non-Sandy expenses,” such as “sand dunes at the Kennedy Space Center, highway repairs in the Virgin Islands, and roof repairs in Washington, D.C.” But Sandy was a storm that stretched far beyond New Jersey and New York as it raced up from the Caribbean.

The Smithsonian Institution suffered roof leaks from heavy winds and torrential rain, resulting in a $2 million request. The shoreline near Launch Pads 39A and B at the Kennedy Space Center also suffered major erosion, leaving the ocean less than a quarter-mile away, so $15 million was added to deal with that problem and repair a NASA facility on Wallops Island in Virginia that also was damaged by Sandy. We couldn’t find a line-item for Virgin Islands highway funding, so it appears to have been relatively minor.

The bill did wrap in some other 2012 disaster funding, including disasters that had been declared over Alaska Chinook salmon, New England groundfish, Mississippi fisheries and American Samoa bottomfish. Those are the fisheries that the Cornyn spokesman referenced — but they were disaster declarations. So one would think it would make sense to include relief in a disaster bill.

Some lawmakers complained about $100 million in funding for Head Start, but that was limited to facilities that had been damaged in New Jersey and New York.

This being Congress, one of course can find some eyebrow-raising provisions. In particular, there was $16 billion for the account that funds Community Development Block Grants, which were aimed at Sandy relief but also could be used for eligible disaster events in calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013. So the main focus was Sandy, but the money could be moved to assist other disaster relief efforts over a three-year period.

Still, it’s all related to disaster relief.

The bill also included tribal and state clean water and pollution mitigation grants ($600 million), funds to improve weather forecasting ($25 million), and upgrades to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration aircraft ($44.5 million). Those provisions were intended to prevent future disasters but arguably were not related to Sandy. But that’s less than 2 percent of the total.

You don't follow along too well... Probably because you RELY on "fact-checkers" rather than doing any research.

Congress LIES all the time. Because they Purposely confuse bills that "evolve" thru several votes and committees. Originally proposed by OBAMA as $69Bill worth of MOSTLY pork..

http://nypost.com/2012/12/15/obama-...th-holiday-goodies-unrelated-to-storm-damage/

WASHINGTON — President Obama’s $60.4 billion request for Hurricane Sandy relief has morphed into a huge Christmas stocking of goodies for federal agencies and even the state of Alaska, The Post has learned.

The pork-barrel feast includes more than $8 million to buy cars and equipment for the Homeland Security and Justice departments. It also includes a whopping $150 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to dole out to fisheries in Alaska and $2 million for the Smithsonian Institution to repair museum roofs in DC.

An eye-popping $13 billion would go to “mitigation” projects to prepare for future storms.

Other big-ticket items in the bill include $207 million for the VA Manhattan Medical Center; $41 million to fix up eight military bases along the storm’s path, including Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; $4 million for repairs at Kennedy Space Center in Florida; $3.3 million for the Plum Island Animal Disease Center and $1.1 million to repair national cemeteries.

Budget watchdogs have dubbed the 94-page emergency-spending bill “Sandy Scam.”

THANKS to Repub opposition like Ted Cruz and others --- this then got pared down to about a $12Bill bill which STILL INCLUDED projects unrelated to Sandy. And FINALLY ended up as a "Sandy Only" bill to FINALLY get the relief money. MONTHS of time expired to fix this. And the snapping poodles on both sides of your tribal conflict can find ANYTHING THEY WANT to quote as fact to keep fighting over this. Including those biased, partisan, shit-headed "fact-checkers" of yours. They just SELECTIVELY QUOTE and do shady "condensing" of the time line and events.

Fact is -- that relief for Sandy WAS delayed months because Obama and Dems used it as an opportunity to load up the 2nd Stimulus bill that they never got...

More from the Obama proposed "Sandy" bill..


$10.78 billion for public transportation, most of which is allocated to future construction and improvements, not disaster relief.
$17 billion for wasteful Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), a program that has become notorious for its use as a backdoor earmark program.



Your "fact checkers" make all dolts look like the kid cheating off his neighbor during a test.. MAJORITY of the original proposed funding was NOT Sandy relief.. It got whittled from $60Bill to $9.7Bill -- So your deceitful fact-checkers just ignored the "facts" to make you look stupid...

lol, you ridicule factcheckers and then provide your own 'factcheckers'.

Goddam that's funny.

 

[American_Jihad]

Professor: Texans 'Deserve' Harvey Because They Voted For Trump

"A sociology professor at the University of Tampa published a tweet on Sunday afternoon suggesting that Texas residents deserve the death, destruction and suffering caused by Hurricane Harvey because a majority of Texas voters supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election."

What a piece of fecal matter.....

You think one crazy crackpot in FloriDuh deserves your attention? Can't you find anything else to post about? Bored much?

You are an attention whore. Your thread title is a fucking lie, too.

You wanna know whats crazy a stupid libtart waiting for 2020 to lose, then you'll be changing your name...

 

[Markle]

Texas does not deserve Harvey because they voted for Trump

However, every natural disaster from here on........Hey....you guys voted in favor of global warming

This has what to do with the global warming scam?

 

[Clementine]

Professor: Texans 'Deserve' Harvey Because They Voted For Trump

"A sociology professor at the University of Tampa published a tweet on Sunday afternoon suggesting that Texas residents deserve the death, destruction and suffering caused by Hurricane Harvey because a majority of Texas voters supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election."

What a piece of fecal matter.....

Yet the city has a Dem mayor who promised to represent all the illegals who are fleeing. He doesn't want them to return to Mexico.

The left is going out of it's way to politicize this crisis. There was a fake news story about Obama volunteering in a soup kitchen to feed the victims but the picture was an old photo op of him serving Thanksgiving dinner a few years ago. Not that facts matter.

The left is trying to shame the victims for accepting any help, calling them closet socialists. Tragedies like this tend to show people's true colors. The left is all about the agenda, nothing more, nothing less.

 

[Markle]

97 percent of scientists say it is no hoax. Only Republicans still deny it

That 97 percent thing has been debunked for so long I'd have expected far, far left Progressives like yourself to have given up trying to shove that one past anyone. So, you're that desperate?

 

[Markle]

Yea I don't want to wait for my church in Michigan to send their little token supplies or Taco Bell sends $1 million that will come in a couple months and the funds won't be distributed for years. Send in Uncle Sam.

Unlike the catastrophe caused by Gov. Blanco and now imprisoned Mayor Ray Nagin, Texas was prepared and have done an incredible job in spite of the fact that this was many times worse than they expected.

So what that the money from Taco Bell won't come for a couple months? Do you not think it will be needed? The clean-up will be going on for years.

How much have you contributed?

What fills you with so much hate?