Rush Limbaugh challenging anyone is funny. The big sissy with the bad ass! Here is a talk show hostess who makes millions and never even served this nation because while he is a perfect a-hole, something was amiss. He uses the nation's resources to spread stupidity while he is a bawk bawk chickenhawk. Blah blah blah blah or is it bawk bawk bawk.....
snopes.com: Rush Limbaugh's Pilonidal Cyst
New Hampshire Gazette I Barking Head Brigade
New Hampshire Gazette I Propaganda Platoon
http://web.archive.org/web/20070205060543/www.nhgazette.com/news/chickenhawks/politicans_platoon/
The first thing one must learn about Libs, like yourself, is that once aspersions and pejoratives are thrown about, they slink away as though there had been a point made. There has not been.
Now read carefully: The President called out Rush Limbaugh. He warned people not to listen to him. He and his hit squad painted him as head of the GOP.
Limbaugh responded: he demanded a debate. The President has never had to face such a challenge, and, we would both bet, will decline. The 'Why' is evident.
At no point in your post did you deal with this, and so I am forced to remind you of a major difference between Conservatives and Liberals:
Since Liberals see their view as a higher calling that that of Conservatives, they mistakenly believe that it is entirely appropriate for then to use, not logic, facts, nor accepted debating techniques, but ad hominem attacks on the physical appearance, personal history, or imaginary mental defects. Notice how the Liberal replaces intellect with emotion. This is, no doubt, based on a medieval concept of recognizing witches and demons. In fact, Liberals attempt to deal with opponents in similar fashion: recall Clarence Thomas High Tech Lynching.
Aren't you embarrassed?