Asclepias
Diamond Member
My point exactly. There was never any evidence to be heard. Thanks for agreeing with me.The courts never heard any evidence, dummy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My point exactly. There was never any evidence to be heard. Thanks for agreeing with me.The courts never heard any evidence, dummy.
I have already explained the proof is in the censorship, the political persecution and the lawfare against investigations and audits. Such a strong reaction costing millions in legal fees for something that did not happen? Give it up you people couldn't act more guilty if you tried.What stolen election? You still havent shown anyone the proof.
My point exactly. There was never any evidence to be heard. Thanks for agreeing with me.
That’s a lie, but whatever. You’re going to keep repeating it no matter what.The courts never heard any evidence, dummy.
IOW you are depending on a conspiracy theory for you proof? Please explain why.I have already explained the proof is in the censorship, the political persecution and the lawfare against investigations and audits. Such a strong reaction costing millions in legal fees for something that did not happen? Give it up you people couldn't act more guilty if you tried.
It is not a conspiracy on my part. The conspiracy was the stolen election and its cover up.IOW you are depending on a conspiracy theory for you proof? Please explain why.
Yeah unprovable claims are called conspiracy theories for a reason. They are not based on facts.It is not a conspiracy on my part. The conspiracy was the stolen election and its cover up.
Either is the narrative. The claims were never baseless. The FBI and DOJ investigated nothing. Seven states symbolically picked alternative electors. Counterfeit ballots have been found in AZ. Duplicate ballots without serial numbers. People registering after the legal cutoff. All of those things are fact.Yeah unprovable claims are called conspiracy theories for a reason. They are not based on facts.
No.....They are conspiracy theories someone fooled you with.All of those things are fact.
LOLOLOLOh no, you losers say it is fake but refuse to prove it. Why is that if you are so sure? You realize it is not fake and pray it never gets anywhere near a courtroom.
LOLOLOLThe wait is almost over. You could be first in line to collect the 5 million. What are you waiting for?
We've been waiting 8 months so far, how many more years you reckon you're gonna need? Keep in mind, we heard the same "wait for it" regarding WMD's in Iraq from rightards like you and it's been 18 years so far, and counting, and the right still hasn't delivered on that yet either.Evidence does not provide a verdict. Courts do. Wait for it.
That's because there was no evidence to present in court. But I really mean it, isn't evidence.The courts never heard any evidence, dummy.
That's not evidence, it's claims. Claims are not evidence.![]()
Yes Oh oh! They are rated pants on fire.Oh oh!![]()
Election Fraud Evidence Continues to Mount
Election officials in Pennsylvania have pretty much admitted that the voting machines were tampered with.thelibertyloft.com
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOh oh!![]()
Election Fraud Evidence Continues to Mount
Election officials in Pennsylvania have pretty much admitted that the voting machines were tampered with.thelibertyloft.com
LOLYes Oh oh! They are rated pants on fire.
![]()
The Liberty Loft - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
"Overall, we rate The Liberty Loft Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency with ownership as well as the promotion of unproven claims."
Attack the information. People are quoted. The source has nothing to do with the facts reported.Yes Oh oh! They are rated pants on fire.
![]()
The Liberty Loft - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
"Overall, we rate The Liberty Loft Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency with ownership as well as the promotion of unproven claims."
The report was fact free. Hence why I am laughing at the source.The source has nothing to do with the facts reported.